• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

65 岁以下和 65 岁以上患者的腹股沟疝修补术:区综合医院的经验。

Inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 65 years of age: a district general hospital experience.

机构信息

Friarage Hospital, Northallerton,United Kingdom.

Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, United Kingdom.

出版信息

S Afr J Surg. 2020 Mar;5(1):22-26.

PMID:32243111
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of laparoscopic and open hernias in the over and under 65s at a district general hospital.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively on patients who underwent a unilateral inguinal hernia repair from 2012 to 2016. Only open mesh Lichtenstein repairs and laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh inguinal hernia repairs were included. The dataset included patients' demographics and comorbidities, type of surgery (open vs. laparoscopic), presentation (elective vs. emergency), length of stay and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

255 patients comprised the study cohort. 126 (49%) patients were under 65 years and 129 (51%) were over 65. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 149 patients (58%), while open technique was used in 106 (42%). A higher proportion of patients over 65 underwent open surgery compared to patients under 65 (55% vs. 28%, ≥ 0.001). Patients over 65 had a higher ASA score ( = 0.0158) and more comorbidities (COPD, DM, Anticoagulation) when compared to younger patients. The number of postop complications were 13 (10%) in the over 65s compared to 14 (11%) in the under 65s ( = 0.94). There was no statistical difference in length of stay between the over and under 65 patients ( = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite more comorbidities in the over 65s, this study shows that there is no significant difference in complication rates between laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair irrespective of age category. Selection bias for the type of repair and the potential for an alpha error mean larger studies are required to show equivalence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较区总医院 65 岁以上和以下人群腹腔镜和开放式疝修补术的结果。

方法

从 2012 年至 2016 年,对接受单侧腹股沟疝修补术的患者进行了回顾性数据分析。仅包括开放式网片 Lichtenstein 修补术和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)网片腹股沟疝修补术。数据集包括患者的人口统计学和合并症、手术类型(开放与腹腔镜)、表现(择期与急诊)、住院时间和术后并发症。

结果

255 例患者纳入研究队列。126 例(49%)患者年龄小于 65 岁,129 例(51%)患者年龄大于 65 岁。腹腔镜手术在 149 例患者(58%)中进行,而开放技术在 106 例患者(42%)中进行。与年龄小于 65 岁的患者相比,年龄大于 65 岁的患者接受开放手术的比例更高(55%比 28%,≥0.001)。与年轻患者相比,年龄大于 65 岁的患者 ASA 评分更高(=0.0158),合并症更多(COPD、DM、抗凝)。65 岁以上患者的术后并发症为 13 例(10%),65 岁以下患者为 14 例(11%)(=0.94)。65 岁以上和以下患者的住院时间无统计学差异(=0.06)。

结论

尽管 65 岁以上患者的合并症更多,但本研究表明,无论年龄类别如何,腹腔镜和开放式腹股沟疝修补术的并发症发生率均无显著差异。需要进行更大的研究以显示选择偏倚,以证明两种修复方式的等效性。

相似文献

1
Inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 65 years of age: a district general hospital experience.65 岁以下和 65 岁以上患者的腹股沟疝修补术:区综合医院的经验。
S Afr J Surg. 2020 Mar;5(1):22-26.
2
Laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TAPP) after radical open retropubic prostatectomy: special features and clinical outcomes.腹腔镜经腹腔腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)在根治性开放耻骨后前列腺切除术之后的应用:特殊特征和临床结局。
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):281-286. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1846-5. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3
A matched comparison of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver disease using propensity score matching.采用倾向评分匹配法对肝病患者进行腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术的配对比较。
Hernia. 2018 Jun;22(3):419-426. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1693-9. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernioplasty: results in 182 Japanese patients.单切口腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片疝修补术:182例日本患者的手术结果
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):797-803. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1540-4. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
5
Transition from Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair to Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.从腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术过渡到机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:单中心回顾性研究
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2251-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3.
6
A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias.一项比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Healthcare Resource Utilization in Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Three-Year Cost Evaluation of Truven Health Marketscan Research Databases.腹股沟疝修补术中的医疗资源利用:特鲁文健康市场扫描研究数据库的三年成本评估。
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.041. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
8
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by modified peritoneal leaflet closure: Description and initial results in children.改良腹膜瓣关闭法腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:儿童中的描述和初步结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Jun;14(3):272.e1-272.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
9
Feasibility of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic hernia repair in elderly patients.老年患者完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜疝修补术的可行性
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1869-y. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women: Trends, disparities, and postoperative outcomes.女性腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:趋势、差异和术后结果。
Am J Surg. 2019 Oct;218(4):726-729. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.022. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgeons' Approach to Intraoperative Complications in Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Hernia Repair.外科医生在全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术中处理术中并发症的方法。
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00020.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic and open inguinal-hernia repair in elderly patients: the experience of two comprehensive medical centers over 10 years.腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术在老年患者中的比较:两个综合性医疗中心 10 年以上的经验。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1195-1203. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03004-0. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Transabdominal Preperitoneal Versus Lichtenstein Procedure for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults: A Comparative Evaluation of the Early Postoperative Pain and Outcomes.
经腹腹膜前修补术与李金斯坦手术治疗成人腹股沟疝的比较:术后早期疼痛及结局的对比评估
Cureus. 2023 Jul 14;15(7):e41886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41886. eCollection 2023 Jul.