• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境属性作为包装和食品服务器具生命周期环境影响指标的意义。

The Significance of Environmental Attributes as Indicators of the Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Packaging and Food Service Ware.

机构信息

Franklin Associates, a Division of Eastern Research Group, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States.

Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2020 May 5;54(9):5356-5364. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07910. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.9b07910
PMID:32243148
Abstract

The environmental impacts of packaging and food service ware (FSW) are increasingly the subject of government policy, public discourse, and industry commitments. While some consideration is given to reducing the impacts of packaging across its entire life cycle, most of the focus is on packaging waste or feedstock substitution. Efforts typically focus on specific packaging characteristics, or material attributes, commonly perceived to be environmentally preferable. This article summarizes an extensive meta-review of existing published literature that was performed to determine whether the material attributes recyclability, recycled content, compostability, and biobased, commonly considered to be environmentally beneficial, correlate with lower net environmental impacts across the full life cycle of the packaging and FSW. Seventy-one unique life cycle assessment (LCA) studies that quantify the environmental impacts throughout the entire life cycle of packaging and FSW were analyzed. These studies included over 5000 comparisons for 13 impact categories commonly analyzed in LCA studies. The results from the meta-review identified a number of instances where material attributes do not correlate with environmental benefits for packaging and FSW. Rather, other characteristics such as material choice or mass of the packaging/FSW products can have higher influence in determining life cycle impacts.

摘要

包装和食品服务器具(FSW)对环境的影响越来越受到政府政策、公众讨论和行业承诺的关注。虽然人们已经开始考虑在整个生命周期内减少包装的影响,但大多数关注的是包装废物或原料替代。这些努力通常侧重于特定的包装特性或材料属性,这些特性通常被认为在环境方面更具优势。本文总结了对现有已发表文献的广泛综合元分析,以确定通常被认为具有环境效益的材料属性(如可回收性、回收含量、可堆肥性和生物基)是否与包装和 FSW 整个生命周期的净环境影响相关。分析了 71 项独特的生命周期评估 (LCA) 研究,这些研究量化了包装和 FSW 整个生命周期的环境影响。这些研究包括在 LCA 研究中通常分析的 13 个影响类别中的 5000 多个比较。元分析的结果确定了在许多情况下,材料属性与包装和 FSW 的环境效益并不相关。相反,其他特性,如材料选择或包装/FSW 产品的质量,对确定生命周期影响具有更高的影响。

相似文献

1
The Significance of Environmental Attributes as Indicators of the Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Packaging and Food Service Ware.环境属性作为包装和食品服务器具生命周期环境影响指标的意义。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 May 5;54(9):5356-5364. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07910. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
Comparison of different methods to include recycling in LCAs of aluminium cans and disposable polystyrene cups.比较不同方法,将其纳入铝罐和一次性聚苯乙烯杯的生命周期评估中进行回收。
Waste Manag. 2016 Feb;48:565-583. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
3
Life cycle assessment of a packaging waste recycling system in Portugal.葡萄牙包装废弃物回收系统的生命周期评估
Waste Manag. 2014 Sep;34(9):1725-35. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Life cycle Analysis of Aluminum Foil Packaging Material.铝箔包装材料的生命周期分析
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2006;81(3-4):199-222.
5
Compostability of bioplastic packaging materials: an overview.生物塑料包装材料的可堆肥性:概述
Macromol Biosci. 2007 Mar 8;7(3):255-77. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200600168.
6
The environmental benefits of improving packaging waste collection in Europe.提高欧洲包装废物收集水平的环境效益。
Waste Manag. 2020 Feb 15;103:426-436. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.045. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
7
Five Misperceptions Surrounding the Environmental Impacts of Single-Use Plastic.五种关于一次性塑料环境影响的误解。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Nov 17;54(22):14143-14151. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05295. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
8
Ecodesign approach for pharmaceutical packaging based on Life Cycle Assessment.基于生命周期评估的药品包装生态设计方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 10;816:151565. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151565. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
9
Correction to The Significance of Environmental Attributes as Indicators of the Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Packaging and Food Service Ware.《关于环境属性作为包装和食品服务餐具生命周期环境影响指标的意义》的勘误
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Dec 15;54(24):16260. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07512. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
10
Potential climate benefits of reusable packaging in food delivery services. A Chinese case study.食品配送服务中可重复使用包装的潜在气候效益。中国案例研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 10;794:148570. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148570. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging trends in biomaterials for sustainable food packaging: A comprehensive review.用于可持续食品包装的生物材料的新兴趋势:全面综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 4;10(1):e24122. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24122. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
2
Life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based packaging solutions for extended shelf-life (ESL) milk.基于生物的包装解决方案在延长货架期(ESL)牛奶中的生命周期评估(LCA)。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(13):18617-18628. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17094-1. Epub 2021 Oct 25.