Ferreira S, Cabral M, da Cruz N F, Simões P, Marques R C
CEG-IST, ULisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.
IST, ULisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.
Waste Manag. 2014 Sep;34(9):1725-35. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been used to assess the environmental impacts associated with an activity or product life cycle. It has also been applied to assess the environmental performance related to waste management activities. This study analyses the packaging waste management system of a local public authority in Portugal. The operations of selective and refuse collection, sorting, recycling, landfilling and incineration of packaging waste were considered. The packaging waste management system in operation in 2010, which we called "Baseline" scenario, was compared with two hypothetical scenarios where all the packaging waste that was selectively collected in 2010 would undergo the refuse collection system and would be sent directly to incineration (called "Incineration" scenario) or to landfill ("Landfill" scenario). Overall, the results show that the "Baseline" scenario is more environmentally sound than the hypothetical scenarios.
生命周期评估(LCA)已被用于评估与一项活动或产品生命周期相关的环境影响。它也已被应用于评估与废物管理活动相关的环境绩效。本研究分析了葡萄牙一个地方公共当局的包装废物管理系统。考虑了包装废物的选择性收集、垃圾收集、分类、回收、填埋和焚烧等操作。将2010年运行的包装废物管理系统(我们称之为“基线”情景)与两个假设情景进行了比较,在这两个假设情景中,2010年选择性收集的所有包装废物将进入垃圾收集系统,并直接送去焚烧(称为“焚烧”情景)或填埋(“填埋”情景)。总体而言,结果表明“基线”情景在环境方面比假设情景更有利。