Suppr超能文献

将利益相关者的反馈纳入异常宫颈癌筛查检测管理指南的制定中。

Incorporating Stakeholder Feedback in Guidelines Development for the Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests.

机构信息

Boston University, Boston, MA.

Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.

出版信息

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr;24(2):167-177. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000524.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines present a paradigm shift from results- to risk-based management. Patient and provider factors can affect guideline adoption. We sought feedback from stakeholders to inform guideline development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To solicit provider feedback, we surveyed attendees at the 2019 ASCCP annual meeting regarding readiness to adopt proposed changes and used a web-based public comment period to gauge agreement/disagreement with preliminary guidelines. We elicited patient feedback via a brief survey on preferences around proposed recommendations for treatment without biopsy. Surveys and public comment included both closed-ended and free-text items. Quantitative results were analyzed using descriptive statistics; qualitative results were analyzed using content analysis. Results were incorporated into guideline development in real time.

RESULTS

Surveys indicated that 98% of providers currently evaluate their patients' past results to determine management; 88% felt formally incorporating history into management would represent an improvement in care. Most providers supported expedited treatment without biopsy: 22% currently perform expedited treatment and 60% were willing to do so. Among patients, 41% preferred expedited treatment, 32% preferred biopsy before treatment, and the remainder were undecided. Responses from the public comment period included agreement/disagreement with preliminary guidelines, reasons for disagreement, and suggestions for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholder feedback was incorporated into the development of the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. Proposed recommendations with less than two-thirds agreement in the public comment period were considered for revision. Findings underscore the importance of stakeholder feedback in developing guidelines that meet the needs of patients and providers.

摘要

目的

2019 年 ASCCP 基于风险的管理共识指南提出了从结果管理向风险管理转变的范式。患者和提供者因素会影响指南的采用。我们寻求利益相关者的反馈意见,以告知指南的制定。

材料与方法

为了征求提供者的反馈意见,我们对 2019 年 ASCCP 年会的与会者进行了调查,了解他们对拟议变更的采用准备情况,并利用基于网络的公开意见征询期来衡量对初步指南的同意/不同意程度。我们通过一个简短的调查来征求患者对拟议治疗建议的反馈意见,这些建议不包括活检。调查和公开意见征询包括封闭式和自由文本项目。使用描述性统计分析定量结果;使用内容分析分析定性结果。结果实时纳入指南制定。

结果

调查表明,目前 98%的提供者评估患者的既往结果以确定管理方法;88%的人认为正式将病史纳入管理将改善护理。大多数提供者支持无需活检的加速治疗:22%的人目前进行加速治疗,60%的人愿意这样做。在患者中,41%的人更喜欢加速治疗,32%的人更喜欢治疗前活检,其余的人则犹豫不决。公开意见征询期的回复包括对初步指南的同意/不同意、不同意的原因以及改进建议。

结论

利益相关者的反馈意见纳入了 2019 年 ASCCP 基于风险的管理共识指南的制定。在公开意见征询期内没有获得三分之二以上同意的拟议建议被考虑进行修订。研究结果强调了在制定符合患者和提供者需求的指南时征求利益相关者反馈意见的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd33/7147423/e103b32f188d/lgt-24-167-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验