Suppr超能文献

PARENTS 2 研究:围产期死亡评审过程中父母参与的共识报告。

PARENTS 2 study: consensus report for parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review process.

机构信息

Centre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Chilterns, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.

EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):215-224. doi: 10.1002/uog.20139.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The PARENTS 1 study (Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death) found that parents would endorse the opportunity to give feedback into the perinatal mortality review (PNMR) process. In subsequent focus groups, healthcare professionals were positive about parental engagement, although they considered that there may be significant challenges. The objective of this study was to develop core principles and recommendations for parental engagement in PNMR in the UK.

METHODS

A two-round Delphi technique was followed to reach consensus on core principles for parental engagement in the PNMR process; Round 1 included a national consensus workshop and Round 2 an online questionnaire. The consensus meeting was attended by a national panel of stakeholders (clinical and academic experts, parent advocates, managers and commissioners) in stillbirth and neonatal and bereavement care. To develop recommendations for parental engagement, participants discussed four key areas comprising: communication with parents, including receiving feedback; the format of the PNMR meeting; the parental engagement pathway; and challenging aspects of engaging with parents in reviews. Content analysis was conducted to generate recommendations from the meeting for a subsequent anonymous web-based survey. Attendees of the consensus workshop and members of the PARENTS 2 Project Advisory Board were asked to rank recommendations using a 9-point Likert scale from 1 (not important) to 9 (critically important). It had been agreed a priori, in compliance with established Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, that 'consensus' would be achieved if over 70% of participants scored the principle as 'critical' (score of 7-9) and fewer than 15% scored the principle as 'not important' (score of 1-3). Principles for which consensus was achieved were included in the core recommendations.

RESULTS

Of the 29 invited stakeholders, 22 participated in the consensus meeting and 25 (86% response rate) in the subsequent online questionnaire in June 2017. Consensus was agreed on 12 core principles. Of the 25 participants, 96% agreed that a face-to-face explanation of the PNMR process was of critical importance, 72% considered that parents should be offered the opportunity to nominate a suitable advocate, 92% believed that responses to parents' comments should be formally documented, 96% indicated that it was vital for action plans to be translated into lessons learnt and that this process should be monitored, and 100% of stakeholders voted that a plain-English summary should be produced for the parents following the meeting. There was good agreement on a further seven principles.

CONCLUSIONS

Key national stakeholders were unanimously supportive of parental engagement in the PNMR process and agreed on core principles to make this process feasible, meaningful and robust. A 6-month pilot of parental engagement in the PNMR process (PARENTS 2 study) in two UK units took place after the consensus on core principles. In collaboration with the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, the findings will inform the national standardized PNMR tool. © 2018 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

PARENTS 1 研究(父母在审查其死产/围产儿死亡中的积极作用和参与)发现,父母会支持有机会对围产儿死亡率审查(PNMR)过程提供反馈。在随后的焦点小组中,医疗保健专业人员对父母的参与持积极态度,尽管他们认为可能存在重大挑战。本研究的目的是为英国 PNMR 中的父母参与制定核心原则和建议。

方法

采用两轮 Delphi 技术就父母参与 PNMR 过程的核心原则达成共识;第一轮包括全国共识研讨会,第二轮是在线问卷调查。全国性的利益相关者(临床和学术专家、父母倡导者、管理人员和专员)参加了全国共识研讨会,他们在死产和新生儿及丧亲护理方面具有专业知识。为了制定父母参与的建议,参与者讨论了四个关键领域:与父母的沟通,包括接收反馈;PNMR 会议的形式;父母参与途径;以及在审查中与父母接触的挑战性方面。内容分析用于从会议中生成建议,以便随后进行匿名在线调查。共识研讨会的与会者和 PARENTS 2 项目咨询委员会的成员被要求使用 9 分李克特量表对建议进行评分,从 1(不重要)到 9(非常重要)。根据既定的推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)标准,事先达成共识,如果超过 70%的参与者将原则评为“关键”(评分 7-9),而不到 15%的参与者将原则评为“不重要”(评分 1-3),则达成共识。列入核心建议的原则是达成共识的。

结果

在 29 名受邀利益相关者中,有 22 人参加了共识会议,2017 年 6 月有 25 人(86%的回复率)参加了后续的在线问卷调查。就 12 项核心原则达成共识。在 25 名参与者中,96%的人认为面对面解释 PNMR 过程至关重要,72%的人认为应该为父母提供提名合适倡导者的机会,92%的人认为应该正式记录对父母意见的回复,96%的人认为行动计划必须转化为经验教训,并对此过程进行监测,100%的利益相关者投票赞成在会议结束后为父母提供英文摘要。还有另外七个原则得到了很好的一致认可。

结论

主要的国家利益相关者一致支持父母参与 PNMR 过程,并就使该过程可行、有意义和稳健的核心原则达成一致。在达成核心原则共识后,英国的两个单位进行了为期 6 个月的 PNMR 过程中父母参与的试点(PARENTS 2 研究)。与国家围产儿流行病学单位合作,研究结果将为国家标准化 PNMR 工具提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b01b/6772129/3dc2c773a8da/UOG-54-215-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验