Suppr超能文献

EPSILoN:免疫治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌中使用临床和血液生物标志物的预后评分。

EPSILoN: A Prognostic Score Using Clinical and Blood Biomarkers in Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy.

机构信息

Medical Thoracic Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Center "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Medical Oncology 1, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Jul;21(4):365-377.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.017. Epub 2020 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Second-line immunotherapy (IO) has shown an overall survival benefit. However, only 18% to 20% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) will respond, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2 to 4 months. Thus, biomarkers to select those patients most likely to benefit from IO are greatly needed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 154 patients with aNSCLC who had received anti-programmed cell death 1 therapy as second line or further treatment. We assessed the absolute neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and eosinophil counts at baseline (T0) and the second (T1) and third (T2) cycles. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived-NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), and their percentage of change at T1 and T2 compared with T0 were evaluated. The clinical characteristics and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level were also considered. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Significant biomarkers for PFS on multivariate analysis were combined in a prognostic score.

RESULTS

For overall survival, the negative prognostic biomarkers were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2, NLR at T0, and dNLR at T1; the LMR at T0, T1, and T2 was identified as a positive prognostic biomarker. For PFS, the negative prognostic biomarkers were ECOG PS 2, liver metastases, NLR at T0, dNLR at T1 and T2, and ≥ 30% increase of NLR from T0 to T1; the positive prognostic biomarkers were heavy smoking, LDH, and LMR at T2. The ≥ 30% increase of LMR from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2 correlated with the overall response rate. A prognostic score (EPSILoN score; smoking, ECOG PS, liver metastases, LDH, NLR) identified 3 prognostic groups (median PFS, 10.2, 4.9, and 1.7 months, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The EPSILoN score combines 5 baseline clinical and blood biomarkers and can help to identify patients with aNSCLC who will most likely benefit from second-line IO. Further studies are warranted.

摘要

背景

二线免疫治疗(IO)已显示出总体生存获益。然而,仅有 18%至 20%的晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)患者会对此产生应答,无进展生存期(PFS)中位数为 2 至 4 个月。因此,急需寻找生物标志物来选择最有可能从 IO 中获益的患者。

患者和方法

我们对 154 例接受抗程序性死亡 1 治疗作为二线或进一步治疗的 aNSCLC 患者进行了回顾性分析。我们评估了基线(T0)和第二(T1)和第三(T2)个周期时的绝对中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞计数。评估了中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、衍生 NLR(dNLR)、淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值(LMR)以及 T1 和 T2 与 T0 相比的百分比变化。还考虑了临床特征和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平。进行了单变量和多变量分析。对多变量分析中与 PFS 相关的有意义的生物标志物进行了组合,形成了一个预后评分。

结果

对于总生存期,负预后生物标志物是东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)表现状态(PS)2、T0 时的 NLR 和 T1 时的 dNLR;T0、T1 和 T2 时的 LMR 被确定为正预后生物标志物。对于 PFS,负预后生物标志物是 ECOG PS 2、肝转移、T0 时的 NLR、T1 和 T2 时的 dNLR 以及 T1 时 NLR 与 T0 相比增加≥30%;正预后生物标志物是重度吸烟、LDH 和 T2 时的 LMR。T0 至 T1 和 T0 至 T2 时 LMR 增加≥30%与总缓解率相关。一个预后评分(EPSILoN 评分;吸烟、ECOG PS、肝转移、LDH、NLR)确定了 3 个预后组(中位 PFS 分别为 10.2、4.9 和 1.7 个月,P<0.001)。

结论

EPSILoN 评分结合了 5 项基线临床和血液生物标志物,可帮助识别最有可能从二线 IO 中获益的 aNSCLC 患者。需要进一步的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验