Epilepsy Center Bethel, Krankenhaus Mara, Maraweg 17-21, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany.
Laboratory Krone, Bad Salzuflen, Germany.
J Neurol. 2020 Jul;267(7):2101-2114. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09814-3. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
To determine frequencies, interlaboratory reproducibility, clinical ratings, and prognostic implications of neural antibodies in a routine laboratory setting in patients with suspected neuropsychiatric autoimmune conditions.
Earliest available samples from 10,919 patients were tested for a broad panel of neural antibodies. Sera that reacted with leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1), contactin-associated protein-2 (CASPR2), or the voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) complex were retested for LGI1 and CASPR2 antibodies by another laboratory. Physicians in charge of patients with positive antibody results retrospectively reported on clinical, treatment, and outcome parameters.
Positive results were obtained for 576 patients (5.3%). Median disease duration was 6 months (interquartile range 0.6-46 months). In most patients, antibodies were detected both in CSF and serum. However, in 16 (28%) patients with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibodies, this diagnosis could be made only in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The two laboratories agreed largely on LGI1 and CASPR2 antibody diagnoses (κ = 0.95). The clinicians (413 responses, 71.7%) rated two-thirds of the antibody-positive patients as autoimmune. Antibodies against the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR), NMDAR (CSF or high serum titer), γ-aminobutyric acid-B receptor (GABABR), and LGI1 had ≥ 90% positive ratings, whereas antibodies against the glycine receptor, VGKC complex, or otherwise unspecified neuropil had ≤ 40% positive ratings. Of the patients with surface antibodies, 64% improved after ≥ 3 months, mostly with ≥ 1 immunotherapy intervention.
This novel approach starting from routine diagnostics in a dedicated laboratory provides reliable and useful results with therapeutic implications. Counseling should consider clinical presentation, demographic features, and antibody titers of the individual patient.
在疑似神经精神自身免疫性疾病患者的常规实验室环境中,确定神经抗体的频率、实验室间可重复性、临床评分和预后意义。
对 10919 名患者最早的可用样本进行广泛的神经抗体检测。与亮氨酸丰富的胶质瘤失活蛋白 1(LGI1)、接触蛋白相关蛋白 2(CASPR2)或电压门控钾通道(VGKC)复合物反应的血清由另一个实验室对 LGI1 和 CASPR2 抗体进行重新检测。负责阳性抗体结果患者的医生回顾性报告临床、治疗和结局参数。
576 名患者(5.3%)的结果为阳性。中位疾病持续时间为 6 个月(四分位距 0.6-46 个月)。在大多数患者中,抗体在脑脊液和血清中均有检测到。然而,在 16 名(28%)NMDA 受体(NMDAR)抗体患者中,仅在脑脊液中才能做出此诊断。两个实验室在 LGI1 和 CASPR2 抗体诊断上基本一致(κ=0.95)。临床医生(413 次回复,71.7%)对三分之二的抗体阳性患者进行自身免疫评估。针对 α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体(AMPAAR)、NMDA 受体(CSF 或高血清滴度)、γ-氨基丁酸-B 受体(GABABR)和 LGI1 的抗体的阳性评分≥90%,而针对甘氨酸受体、VGKC 复合物或其他未特指神经突的抗体的阳性评分≤40%。在表面抗体患者中,64%在≥3 个月后改善,大多数患者接受≥1 种免疫治疗干预。
从专用实验室的常规诊断开始的这种新方法提供了具有治疗意义的可靠且有用的结果。咨询应考虑个体患者的临床表现、人口统计学特征和抗体滴度。