Suppr超能文献

审视陈述性记忆的灰色地带:特质知识任务的自我参照和时间取向是否会调节晚期正成分(LPC)?

Scrutinizing the grey areas of declarative memory: Do the self-reference and temporal orientation of a trait knowledge task modulate the Late Positive Component (LPC)?

作者信息

Tanguay Annick F N, Palombo Daniela J, Atance Cristina M, Renoult Louis, Davidson Patrick S R

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2020 May;142:107444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107444. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Abstract

Knowledge about the future self may engage cognitive processes typically ascribed to episodic memory, such as awareness of the future self as an extension of the current self (i.e., autonoetic awareness) and the construction of future events. In a prior study (Tanguay et al., 2018), temporal orientation influenced the Late Positive Component (LPC), an ERP correlate of recollection. The LPC amplitude for present traits was intermediate between semantic and episodic memory, whereas thinking about one's future traits produced a larger LPC amplitude that was similar to episodic memory. Here, we examined further the effect of temporal orientation on the LPC amplitude and investigated if it was influenced by whether knowledge concerns the self or another person, with the proximity of the other being considered. Participants verified whether traits (e.g., Enthusiastic) were true of themselves and the "other," both now and in the future. Proximity of the other person was manipulated between subjects, such that participants either thought about the typical traits of a close friend (n = 31), or those of their age group more broadly (n = 35). Self-reference and temporal orientation interacted: The LPC amplitude for future knowledge was larger than for present knowledge, but only for the self. This effect of temporal orientation was not observed when participants thought about the traits of other people. The proximity of the other person did not modify these effects. Future-oriented cognition can engage different cognitive processes depending on self-reference; knowledge about the personal future increased the LPC amplitude unlike thinking about the future of other people. Our findings strengthen the notion of self-knowledge as a grey area between semantic and episodic memory.

摘要

关于未来自我的认知可能会涉及到通常归因于情景记忆的认知过程,比如将未来自我视为当前自我的延伸的意识(即自我觉知)以及对未来事件的构建。在之前的一项研究中(坦圭等人,2018年),时间取向影响了晚期正成分(LPC),这是一种与回忆相关的事件相关电位。当前特质的LPC波幅介于语义记忆和情景记忆之间,而思考自己未来的特质会产生更大的LPC波幅,这与情景记忆相似。在这里,我们进一步研究了时间取向对LPC波幅的影响,并调查它是否受到知识涉及的是自我还是他人的影响,同时考虑了他人的亲近程度。参与者要核实特质(如热情)现在和未来对自己以及“他人”是否真实。他人的亲近程度在受试者之间进行了操纵,使得参与者要么思考亲密朋友(n = 31)的典型特质,要么更广泛地思考他们这个年龄组(n = 35)的典型特质。自我参照和时间取向存在交互作用:未来知识的LPC波幅大于当前知识的LPC波幅,但仅针对自我而言。当参与者思考他人的特质时,未观察到这种时间取向的影响。他人的亲近程度并未改变这些影响。取决于自我参照,面向未来的认知可以涉及不同的认知过程;与思考他人的未来不同,关于个人未来的知识增加了LPC波幅。我们的研究结果强化了自我知识是语义记忆和情景记忆之间的灰色地带这一概念。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验