• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准简易椭圆切口无引流和皮下缝合技术在前耳窦手术中的临床疗效。

Clinical efficacy of standard simple elliptical incision following drain-less and subcutaneous suture technique in preauricular sinus surgery.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea.

Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul-Aug;41(4):102465. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102465. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102465
PMID:32247708
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to review our surgical strategy and outcomes of drain-less, subcutaneous suture technique in standard simple elliptical incision on preauricular sinus (PAS) cases.

METHODS

The clinical records of 198 patients (247 ears) with PASs who were operated via standard simple elliptical incision with drain-less, subcutaneous suture technique by a single surgeon (K.H.P.) between January 2008 and December 2018 were reviewed for analysis. Patients' demographics, location of PASs, previous incision and drainage (I&D) history, previous surgical excision history, duration of follow-up, postoperative infection after surgery, and recurrence after surgery were analysed.

RESULTS

Out of 247 PASs, 18 (7.3%) cases had postoperative infections and 11 (4.5%) cases showed recurrence. Postoperative infection rate were higher in previous I&D groups (PIDGs, 9.8%) and previous fistulectomy groups (PFGs, 10%), and also recurrence rates of PFGs (10%) was higher than those of fresh cases. However, there were no statistically significant differences between these groups. In addition, PAS patients with postoperative complications such as infection and recurrence were more common in male patients.

CONCLUSION

We report a method of drain-less standard simple elliptical incision for the surgical removal of PAS and the outcomes of the surgery. Our method showed a low recurrence rate and low chance of wound infection postoperatively not only in fresh cases but also in pre-operative I&D cases and even previous fistulectomy cases. In conclusion, our method is proposed as an effective and safe method in all kind of patient groups, without presenting post-operative discomfort to patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在回顾我们在标准耳前窦(PAS)单纯性椭圆形切开术中无引流、皮下缝合技术的手术策略和结果。

方法

对 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间由同一位外科医生(K.H.P.)通过无引流、皮下缝合技术行标准单纯性椭圆形切口治疗的 198 例(247 耳)PAS 患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。分析患者的人口统计学特征、PAS 位置、既往切开引流(I&D)史、既往手术切除史、随访时间、术后感染及术后复发情况。

结果

247 例 PAS 中,术后感染 18 例(7.3%),复发 11 例(4.5%)。既往 I&D 组(PIDGs)和既往瘘管切除术组(PFGs)的术后感染发生率较高(9.8%和 10%),且 PFGs 的复发率(10%)高于新鲜病例,但差异无统计学意义。此外,伴有术后感染和复发等并发症的 PAS 患者中,男性更为常见。

结论

我们报告了一种无引流标准单纯性椭圆形切口治疗 PAS 的方法及手术结果。我们的方法显示,不仅在新鲜病例中,而且在术前 I&D 病例甚至既往瘘管切除术病例中,术后复发率和感染率均较低。因此,我们的方法被认为是一种有效且安全的方法,适用于所有类型的患者,不会给患者带来术后不适。

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy of standard simple elliptical incision following drain-less and subcutaneous suture technique in preauricular sinus surgery.标准简易椭圆切口无引流和皮下缝合技术在前耳窦手术中的临床疗效。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul-Aug;41(4):102465. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102465. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Minimization of skin incision at preauricular sinusectomy using a trans pit approach.经耳前窦切口使用皮内入路行耳前窦切除术以最小化皮肤切口。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;132:109903. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109903. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
3
Decision making in the choice of surgical management for preauricular sinuses with different severities.不同严重程度的耳前窦选择手术治疗的决策。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jun;148(6):959-64. doi: 10.1177/0194599813483447. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
4
Safety and efficacy of preauricular fistulectomy with fascia-anchoring suture technique: A large case series.耳前瘘管切除术联合筋膜锚定缝合技术的安全性和有效性:一项大病例系列研究。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 Mar-Apr;45(2):104188. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104188. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
5
A modified supra-auricular approach with helix cartilage suture for surgical treatment of the preauricular sinus.一种改良的耳上入路联合耳轮软骨缝合术治疗耳前瘘管
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Nov;114:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.08.041. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
Surgical technique for complicated preauricular sinus: Pilot study of double elliptical excision with coaptation suture.复杂耳前窦的手术技术:双椭圆形切除联合对接缝合的初步研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;177:111858. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111858. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
7
Surgical results of infected preauricular sinus: No need for delay.感染性耳前瘘管的手术结果:无需拖延。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;135:110129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110129. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
Preauricular sinus: advantage of the drainless minimal supra-auricular approach.前耳窦:无引流微创耳上入路的优势。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
9
A new surgical technique for treatment of preauricular sinus.一种治疗耳前窦的新手术技术。
Surgery. 2005 May;137(5):567-70. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.01.009.
10
A systematic review on the surgical outcome of preauricular sinus excision techniques.耳前窦道切除技术手术结果的系统评价
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jul;126(7):1535-44. doi: 10.1002/lary.25829. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
[λ approach for the repairment of large skin defects after resection of preauricular fistula with cellulitis in children].[儿童耳前瘘管伴蜂窝织炎切除术后大面积皮肤缺损修复的λ方法]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Feb;37(2):113-115;121. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.02.007.
2
Resecting the Lesion Combined with Local Flap Repairing for the Treatment of Infected Congenital Preauricular Fistula.切除病灶联合局部皮瓣修复治疗感染性先天性耳前瘘管
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Oct 28;14:7285-7292. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S331698. eCollection 2021.