• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻窦切除术和一期缝合与切除和一期缝合在藏毛窦疾病中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Sinusectomy and primary closure versus excision and primary closure in pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, 06180, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of General Surgery, Bezmialem Vakıf University School of Medicine, 34000, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1117-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03575-1. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-020-03575-1
PMID:32248289
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various surgical procedures are available for the treatment of pilonidal sinus diseases (PSD), but the best surgical approach remains controversial. Minimally invasive surgical procedures are more popular than surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sinusectomy with primary closure (SPC) in comparison with excision and primary closure (EPC) in primary or recurrent cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted with two cohort groups in which 351 patients with PSD underwent either SPC or EPC. The two procedures were compared according to the presence of short-term complications and recurrence of PSD.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 134 underwent EPC and 217 underwent SPC. The length of stay and the wound healing time were significantly longer in the EPC group than in the SPC group. The occurrence rates of wound site infection and abscess were significantly higher in the EPC group than in the SPC group; however, seroma was statistically significantly more common in the SPC group than in the EPC group. The recurrence rates were 18.7% and 5.5% in the EPC and SPC groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SPC is an efficient procedure for the treatment of patients with PSD showing simple and complicated disease patterns.

摘要

背景

各种手术方法可用于治疗藏毛窦疾病(PSD),但最佳手术方法仍存在争议。微创手术比手术更受欢迎。本研究旨在评估经皮窦道切除术(SPC)与切除和一期缝合术(EPC)治疗原发性或复发性 PSD 的疗效。

材料和方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,将 351 例 PSD 患者分为两组,分别行 SPC 或 EPC。根据短期并发症和 PSD 复发的情况比较两种手术方法。

结果

EPC 组 134 例,SPC 组 217 例。EPC 组的住院时间和伤口愈合时间明显长于 SPC 组。EPC 组的伤口部位感染和脓肿发生率明显高于 SPC 组;然而,SPC 组的血清肿发生率明显高于 EPC 组。EPC 组和 SPC 组的复发率分别为 18.7%和 5.5%。

结论

SPC 是治疗 PSD 患者的有效方法,可用于治疗单纯和复杂疾病。

相似文献

1
Sinusectomy and primary closure versus excision and primary closure in pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.鼻窦切除术和一期缝合与切除和一期缝合在藏毛窦疾病中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1117-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03575-1. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
2
Sinusectomy for primary pilonidal sinus: less is more.经鼻内镜鼻窦手术治疗原发性藏毛窦:少即是多。
Surgery. 2011 Nov;150(5):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.019. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
3
A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.四种不同手术方法治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的对比分析。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Oct;42(10):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
4
Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment versus total excision with primary closure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease in the pediatric population.小儿骶尾部藏毛窦疾病的内镜下藏毛窦治疗与一期缝合的全切除治疗对比
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Oct;53(10):2003-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.094. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: A minimally invasive surgical technique.内镜下骶尾部藏毛窦治疗:一种微创外科技术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):458-463. doi: 10.1111/ases.12893. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
How to repair the surgical defect after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a dilemma.如何修复骶尾部藏毛窦切除术后的手术缺损:一个两难问题。
J Wound Care. 2014 Dec;23(12):630-3. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.630.
7
Negative pressure wound therapy following excision of pilonidal sinus disease: A retrospective review.藏毛窦疾病切除术后的负压伤口治疗:一项回顾性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2961-2966. doi: 10.1111/codi.15890. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
8
Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) versus sinusectomy for treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative study.视频辅助切除藏毛窦(VAAPS)与切除窦道治疗慢性藏毛窦疾病的比较研究
Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):179-183. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-00611-2. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
Endoscopic Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease in Children: A Systematic Review.儿童藏毛窦疾病的内镜治疗:一项系统评价
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 May;33(5):512-517. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0564. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
10
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus.比较不同技术与一期缝合治疗慢性藏毛窦的随机对照试验的Meta分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Oct;18(10):863-72. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1149-5. Epub 2014 Apr 30.