Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, LondonEC1M 6BQ, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Apr 6;29:e113. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000232.
AIMS: Psychotropic prescription rates continue to increase in the United States (USA). Few studies have investigated whether social-structural factors may play a role in psychotropic medication use independent of mental illness. Food insecurity is prevalent among people living with HIV in the USA and has been associated with poor mental health. We investigated whether food insecurity was associated with psychotropic medication use independent of the symptoms of depression and anxiety among women living with HIV in the USA. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS), a nationwide cohort study. Food security (FS) was the primary explanatory variable, measured using the Household Food Security Survey Module. First, we used multivariable linear regressions to test whether FS was associated with symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression [CESD] score), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7 score) and mental health-related quality of life (MOS-HIV Mental Health Summary score; MHS). Next, we examined associations of FS with the use of any psychotropic medications, including antidepressants, sedatives and antipsychotics, using multivariable logistic regressions adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, income, education and alcohol and substance use. In separate models, we additionally adjusted for symptoms of depression (CESD score) and anxiety (GAD-7 score). RESULTS: Of the 905 women in the sample, two-thirds were African-American. Lower FS (i.e. worse food insecurity) was associated with greater symptoms of depression and anxiety in a dose-response relationship. For the psychotropic medication outcomes, marginal and low FS were associated with 2.06 (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36-3.13) and 1.99 (p < 0.01; 95% CI = 1.26-3.15) times higher odds of any psychotropic medication use, respectively, before adjusting for depression and anxiety. The association of very low FS with any psychotropic medication use was not statistically significant. A similar pattern was found for antidepressant and sedative use. After additionally adjusting for CESD and GAD-7 scores, marginal FS remained associated with 1.93 (p < 0.05; 95% CI = 1.16-3.19) times higher odds of any psychotropic medication use. Very low FS, conversely, was significantly associated with lower odds of antidepressant use (adjusted odds ratio = 0.42; p < 0.05; 95% CI = 0.19-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Marginal FS was associated with higher odds of using psychotropic medications independent of depression and anxiety, while very low FS was associated with lower odds. These complex findings may indicate that people experiencing very low FS face barriers to accessing mental health services, while those experiencing marginal FS who do access services are more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medications for distress arising from social and structural factors.
目的:在美国,精神类药物处方率持续上升。很少有研究调查社会结构因素是否可能在独立于精神疾病的情况下对精神类药物的使用起作用。美国艾滋病毒感染者中普遍存在粮食不安全问题,并且与心理健康状况不佳有关。我们调查了粮食不安全状况是否与美国艾滋病毒感染者的精神类药物使用有关,而与抑郁和焦虑症状无关。
方法:我们使用了全国性队列研究妇女机构间艾滋病毒研究(WIHS)的横断面数据。粮食安全(FS)是主要的解释变量,使用家庭粮食安全调查模块进行测量。首先,我们使用多变量线性回归来检验 FS 是否与抑郁症状(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表[CESD]评分)、广泛性焦虑症(GAD-7 评分)和心理健康相关生活质量(MOS-HIV 心理健康综合评分[MHS])有关。接下来,我们使用多变量逻辑回归来检查 FS 与使用任何精神类药物(包括抗抑郁药、镇静剂和抗精神病药)之间的关联,调整了年龄、种族/民族、收入、教育以及酒精和物质使用情况。在单独的模型中,我们还调整了抑郁症状(CESD 评分)和焦虑症状(GAD-7 评分)。
结果:在样本中的 905 名女性中,三分之二为非裔美国人。较低的 FS(即更严重的粮食不安全)与抑郁和焦虑症状呈剂量反应关系。对于精神类药物的结果,边缘性和低 FS 与任何精神类药物使用的几率分别增加 2.06 倍(p < 0.001;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.36-3.13)和 1.99 倍(p < 0.01;95% CI = 1.26-3.15),在调整抑郁和焦虑症状之前。非常低的 FS 与任何精神类药物使用之间的关联没有统计学意义。抗抑郁药和镇静剂使用的情况类似。在另外调整了 CESD 和 GAD-7 评分后,边缘性 FS 仍然与任何精神类药物使用的几率增加 1.93 倍(p < 0.05;95% CI = 1.16-3.19)有关。相反,非常低的 FS 与抗抑郁药使用的几率降低显著相关(调整后的优势比= 0.42;p < 0.05;95% CI = 0.19-0.96)。
结论:边缘性 FS 与使用精神类药物的几率增加有关,而与抑郁和焦虑无关,而非常低的 FS 与几率降低有关。这些复杂的发现可能表明,经历非常低的 FS 的人在获得心理健康服务方面面临障碍,而经历边缘性 FS 并获得服务的人更有可能因社会和结构因素而产生的困扰而被开出精神类药物。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020-4-6
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016-2-18
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010-1
PLOS Digit Health. 2024-6-5
Am J Prev Med. 2021-4
Int J Epidemiol. 2018-4-1
JAMA Intern Med. 2017-2-1