Suppr超能文献

去神经肌肉电刺激的疗效:一项多中心、双盲、随机临床试验。

Efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A, Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2020 Jun;61(6):773-778. doi: 10.1002/mus.26880. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle (ESDM) on recovery of patients with peripheral nerve injuries.

METHODS

We enrolled 38 patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injuries with axonal damage and clinical impairment of two muscles, who were randomly treated with real or sham electrical stimulation (ES). Clinical and neurophysiological examinations were performed before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 3 mo posttreatment, by the same physician who was blinded to the ES allocation.

RESULTS

All patients improved but there was no significant beneficial effect of ESDM compared with sham treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of ESDM for peripheral nerve injuries. However, given the large number of variables related to ES and the heterogeneity in disease etiologies and clinical manifestations, future studies on homogeneous populations using different stimulation protocols may be useful.

摘要

背景

这是一项多中心、双盲、随机临床试验,旨在研究去神经肌肉电刺激(ESDM)对外周神经损伤患者康复的疗效。

方法

我们招募了 38 名外伤性周围神经损伤伴轴索损伤和两块肌肉临床功能障碍的患者,他们被随机接受真电刺激或假电刺激(ES)治疗。在治疗前、治疗结束时和治疗后 3 个月,由对 ES 分配不知情的同一位医生进行临床和神经生理学检查。

结果

所有患者均有改善,但 ESDM 治疗与假治疗相比无显著益处。

结论

本研究未能证明 ESDM 对外周神经损伤有效。然而,鉴于与 ES 相关的大量变量以及疾病病因和临床表现的异质性,未来在使用不同刺激方案的同质人群中进行的研究可能会有所帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验