Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):e15-e26. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000191. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Research indicates that spending money on others--leads to greater happiness than spending money on oneself (e.g., Dunn, Aknin, & Norton, 2008, 2014). These findings have received widespread attention because they offer insight into why people engage in costly prosocial behavior, and what constitutes happier spending more broadly. However, most studies on prosocial spending (like most research on the emotional benefits of generosity) utilized small sample sizes ( < 100/cell). In light of new, improved standards for evidentiary value, we conducted high-powered registered replications of the central paradigms used in prosocial spending research. In Experiment 1, 712 students were randomly assigned to make a purchase for themselves or a stranger in need and then reported their happiness. As predicted, participants assigned to engage in prosocial (vs. personal) spending reported greater momentary happiness. In Experiment 2, 1950 adults recalled a time they spent money on themselves or someone else and then reported their current happiness; contrary to predictions, participants in the prosocial spending condition did not report greater happiness than those in the personal spending condition. Because low levels of task engagement may have produced these null results, we conducted a replication with minor changes designed to increase engagement; in this Experiment 3 ( = 5,199), participants who recalled a prosocial (vs. personal) spending memory reported greater happiness but differences were small. Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that spending money on others does promote happiness, but demonstrate that the magnitude of the effect depends on several methodological features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
研究表明,将钱花在他人身上——比将钱花在自己身上(例如,邓恩、阿克宁和诺顿,2008 年,2014 年)更能带来幸福感。这些发现引起了广泛关注,因为它们深入了解了人们为什么会进行昂贵的亲社会行为,以及更广泛地说,什么构成了更幸福的消费。然而,大多数关于亲社会消费的研究(就像大多数关于慷慨的情感益处的研究一样)使用的样本量较小(<100/组)。鉴于新的、改进的证据价值标准,我们对亲社会消费研究中使用的核心范式进行了高功效的已注册重复研究。在实验 1 中,712 名学生被随机分配为自己或有需要的陌生人购买东西,然后报告他们的幸福感。正如预测的那样,被分配进行亲社会(相对于个人)消费的参与者报告了更高的即时幸福感。在实验 2 中,1950 名成年人回忆了他们为自己或他人花钱的一次经历,然后报告了他们目前的幸福感;与预测相反,亲社会消费条件下的参与者并没有报告比个人消费条件下的参与者更高的幸福感。由于任务参与度低可能导致这些无效结果,我们进行了一项具有微小变化的复制实验,旨在提高参与度;在这项实验 3(=5199)中,回忆起亲社会(相对于个人)消费记忆的参与者报告了更高的幸福感,但差异很小。总的来说,这些研究支持了这样一种假设,即把钱花在别人身上确实能促进幸福感,但也表明这种效应的大小取决于几个方法学特征。(心理学信息数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。