• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脐疝择期修补术中补片与缝线的比较:系统评价与Meta分析

Mesh versus suture in elective repair of umbilical hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Madsen L J, Oma E, Jorgensen L N, Jensen K K

机构信息

Digestive Disease Centre, Research Department, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 11, Entrance 8, Ground Floor, DK-2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):369-379. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50276. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50276
PMID:32250556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7260408/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mesh repair of umbilical hernia has been associated with a reduced recurrence rate compared with suture closure, but potentially at the expense of increased postoperative complications and chronic pain. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the outcomes after elective open mesh and suture repair for umbilical hernia in adults.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify studies presenting original data on elective open mesh and suture repair of umbilical hernia. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection (SSI), seroma, haematoma and chronic pain. Meta-analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 5353 hits and led to 14 studies being included (6 RCTs and 8 observational studies) describing a total of 2361 patients. Compared with suture, mesh repair was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 0·48, 95 per cent c.i. 0·30 to 0·77), with number needed to treat 19 (95 per cent c.i. 14 to 31). Mesh repair was associated with a higher risk of seroma (RR 2·37, 1·45 to 3·87), with number needed to harm 30 (17 to 86). There was no significant difference in the risk of SSI, haematoma or chronic pain.

CONCLUSION

The use of mesh in elective repair of umbilical hernia reduced the risk of recurrence compared with suture closure without altering the risk of chronic pain.

摘要

背景

与缝合修补相比,脐疝的补片修补术可降低复发率,但可能会增加术后并发症和慢性疼痛的风险。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是研究成人脐疝择期开放补片修补术和缝合修补术后的结局。

方法

进行文献检索,以确定提供成人脐疝择期开放补片修补术和缝合修补术原始数据的研究。主要结局为疝复发。次要结局包括手术部位感染(SSI)、血清肿、血肿和慢性疼痛。进行荟萃分析。

结果

检索共获得5353条结果,纳入14项研究(6项随机对照试验和8项观察性研究),共涉及2361例患者。与缝合修补相比,补片修补术复发风险较低(风险比(RR)0.48,95%置信区间0.30至0.77),需治疗人数为19(95%置信区间14至31)。补片修补术血清肿风险较高(RR 2.37,1.45至3.87),需伤害人数为30(17至86)。SSI、血肿或慢性疼痛风险无显著差异。

结论

与缝合修补相比,脐疝择期修补术中使用补片可降低复发风险,且不改变慢性疼痛风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b722/7260408/3898af9c6515/BJS5-4-369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b722/7260408/3f05f4cd7e24/BJS5-4-369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b722/7260408/ba6b4aed5934/BJS5-4-369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b722/7260408/3898af9c6515/BJS5-4-369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b722/7260408/3f05f4cd7e24/BJS5-4-369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b722/7260408/ba6b4aed5934/BJS5-4-369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b722/7260408/3898af9c6515/BJS5-4-369-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Mesh versus suture in elective repair of umbilical hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis.脐疝择期修补术中补片与缝线的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):369-379. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50276. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs.用于择期脐疝修补的缝线与腹膜前聚丙烯补片对比研究
J Surg Res. 2014 Dec;192(2):426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.080. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
3
Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.开放式网片与缝线修补脐疝的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Feb;62:62-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
Open mesh vs. suture umbilical hernia repair: systematic review and updated trial sequential meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.网片与缝线修补脐疝的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和更新的试验序贯荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2020 Aug;24(4):707-715. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02146-1. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
5
Comparison of glue versus suture mesh fixation for primary open inguinal hernia mesh repair by Lichtenstein technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胶与缝线网片固定在经 Lichtenstein 技术行原发性腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1105-1120. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02571-4. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.择期原发性腹疝修补术采用合成网片与缝线修复的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2014 May;149(5):415-21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014.
7
Flat patch mesh versus three-dimensional mesh (plug) for open umbilical or epigastric hernia repair. A retrospective study.平片补片与三维补片( Plug )在开放性脐疝或上腹部疝修补术中的应用。一项回顾性研究。
Ann Ital Chir. 2023;94:512-517.
8
Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在择期正中剖腹手术中预防性放置补片是否能降低切口疝的发生率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1149-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial.成人脐疝的网片与缝线修补:一项随机、双盲、对照、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 3;391(10123):860-869. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30298-8. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
10
Surgical outcome of mesh and suture repair in primary umbilical hernia: postoperative complications and recurrence.原发性脐疝修补术中补片与缝线修补的手术结果:术后并发症及复发情况
Hernia. 2016 Aug;20(4):509-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1466-x. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Italian national consensus conference on the diagnosis and treatment of Rectus Abdominis diastasis in Post-gravidic Women.意大利产后女性腹直肌分离诊断与治疗全国共识会议。
Hernia. 2025 Jun 27;29(1):213. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03403-x.
2
Onlay mesh versus suture repair for smaller umbilical hernias in adults-early results from SUMMER trial: randomized clinical trial.成人小型脐疝补片修补与缝合修补对比——SUMMER试验早期结果:随机临床试验
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae173.
3
Surgical practices in emergency umbilical hernia repair and implications for trial design.

本文引用的文献

1
Lower Risk of Recurrence After Mesh Repair Versus Non-Mesh Sutured Repair in Open Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.网片修补与非网片缝合修补在开放性脐疝修补术中的复发风险较低:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Scand J Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):187-193. doi: 10.1177/1457496918812208. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
2
Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial.成人脐疝的网片与缝线修补:一项随机、双盲、对照、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 3;391(10123):860-869. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30298-8. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
3
急诊脐疝修补术中的手术实践及对试验设计的影响。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2333-2341. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03165-y. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
4
Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.网片与缝线在择期开放修补原发性脐疝中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2069-2078. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
5
The role of computed tomography in acute bowel obstruction due to a supravesical hernia: a case report from Nepal.计算机断层扫描在膀胱上疝所致急性肠梗阻中的作用:来自尼泊尔的病例报告
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 May 27;86(7):4268-4273. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002222. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Repair of umbilical hernias concomitant to other procedures is safe: a propensity score-matched database study.同时修复脐疝和其他手术是安全的:一项倾向评分匹配的数据库研究。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1093-1101. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02977-2. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Ventralex™ ST Hernia Patch Repair for Small Umbilical Hernia is Safe and Effective: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Ventralex™ ST疝修补片修复小儿脐疝安全有效:一项回顾性队列研究
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023 Jun 2;2:11499. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2023.11499. eCollection 2023.
8
Effectiveness of simultaneous umbilical hernia primary repair with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术同期脐疝一期修补术的疗效
North Clin Istanb. 2023 Sep 25;10(5):556-559. doi: 10.14744/nci.2022.02700. eCollection 2023.
9
Clinician preferences in the treatment of acutely symptomatic hernia: the 'MASH' survey.临床医生对急性症状性疝治疗的偏好:MASH 调查。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Mar;105(3):225-230. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0304. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
10
Trocar umbilical hernia repair by open suture repair and open suture-mesh repair in an ambulatory setting in comparison to recurrent and primary umbilical hernia repair.在门诊环境中,通过开放缝合修补术和开放缝合补片修补术进行脐部套管针疝修补术,并与复发性和原发性脐疝修补术进行比较。
J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Sep 2;2020(9):rjaa270. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa270. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Long-term follow-up results of umbilical hernia repair.
脐疝修补术的长期随访结果
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Dec;12(4):350-356. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.70327. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
4
How Do We Value Postoperative Recovery?: A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Patient-reported Outcomes After Abdominal Surgery.术后恢复如何评估?:腹部手术后患者报告结局测量特性的系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):656-669. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002415.
5
Hernioplasty: Tension free mesh repair versus Mayos repair for umbilical hernias.疝修补术:脐疝的无张力补片修补术与梅奥修补术对比
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Jan;67(1):24-26.
6
Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review.腹疝管理:基于系统评价的专家共识
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):80-89. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701.
7
Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: why not just live together?随机对照试验与观察性研究:为何不能“共生共荣”?
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0265-3.
8
Surgical outcome of mesh and suture repair in primary umbilical hernia: postoperative complications and recurrence.原发性脐疝修补术中补片与缝线修补的手术结果:术后并发症及复发情况
Hernia. 2016 Aug;20(4):509-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1466-x. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
9
Long-term recurrence and chronic pain after repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias: a regional cohort study.小儿脐疝或上腹疝修补术后的长期复发及慢性疼痛:一项区域队列研究
Am J Surg. 2015 Apr;209(4):725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
10
Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs.用于择期脐疝修补的缝线与腹膜前聚丙烯补片对比研究
J Surg Res. 2014 Dec;192(2):426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.080. Epub 2014 Jun 4.