• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网片与缝线修补脐疝的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和更新的试验序贯荟萃分析。

Open mesh vs. suture umbilical hernia repair: systematic review and updated trial sequential meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.

Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Hernia. 2020 Aug;24(4):707-715. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02146-1. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-020-02146-1
PMID:32096090
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the updated evidence on safety, effectiveness, and outcomes of mesh versus suture elective umbilical hernia (UH) repair and to explore the timely tendency variations favouring one treatment over another.

METHODS

MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases were consulted. A systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were conducted.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were included for a total of 742 patients. Overall, 383 (51.6%) underwent mesh, while 359 (48.4%) underwent suture repair. The estimated pooled postoperative recurrence RR was 0.27 (95% CI 0.13-0.53; p < 0.001). The TSA showed a statistically significant timely tendency in favour of mesh repair with a boundary cross curve (Z = 1.96) before reaching the information size. The estimated pooled seroma, haematoma, and wound infection RR were 1.45 (p = 0.368), 0.54 (p = 0.196), and 0.71 (p = 0.375), respectively. The TSA for wound-related complications showed partial, non-significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective UH mesh repair seems to be associated with reduced risk of postoperative recurrence compared to simple suture repair with a statistically significant timely trend endorsed by the TSA. Definitive considerations concerning the cumulative effect for seroma, haematoma, and wound infection are premature. Further studies are warranted to endorse these results and deeply investigate the timely tendency variations.

摘要

目的

考察关于网片与缝线选择性脐疝(UH)修复的安全性、有效性和结局的最新证据,并探讨有利于一种治疗方法而非另一种治疗方法的及时趋势变化。

方法

检索 MEDLINE 和 CENTRAL 数据库。进行了系统评价、成对荟萃分析和试验序贯分析(TSA)。

结果

共纳入 6 项 RCT,总计 742 例患者。总体而言,383 例(51.6%)接受了网片修复,359 例(48.4%)接受了缝线修复。估计术后复发的 RR 为 0.27(95%CI 0.13-0.53;p<0.001)。TSA 显示,在达到信息大小之前,网片修复具有统计学意义的及时趋势,跨越了边界交叉曲线(Z=1.96)。估计的血清肿、血肿和伤口感染的 RR 分别为 1.45(p=0.368)、0.54(p=0.196)和 0.71(p=0.375)。关于伤口相关并发症的 TSA 显示部分结果无统计学意义。

结论

与单纯缝线修复相比,选择性 UH 网片修复似乎与术后复发风险降低相关,TSA 支持这一具有统计学意义的及时趋势。关于血清肿、血肿和伤口感染的累积效应的明确结论还为时过早。需要进一步的研究来支持这些结果,并深入探讨及时趋势变化。

相似文献

1
Open mesh vs. suture umbilical hernia repair: systematic review and updated trial sequential meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.网片与缝线修补脐疝的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和更新的试验序贯荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2020 Aug;24(4):707-715. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02146-1. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.开放式网片与缝线修补脐疝的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Feb;62:62-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Mesh versus suture in elective repair of umbilical hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis.脐疝择期修补术中补片与缝线的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):369-379. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50276. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
4
Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs.用于择期脐疝修补的缝线与腹膜前聚丙烯补片对比研究
J Surg Res. 2014 Dec;192(2):426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.080. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
5
Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial.成人脐疝的网片与缝线修补:一项随机、双盲、对照、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 3;391(10123):860-869. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30298-8. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
6
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中,使用胶水与缝线进行补片固定对慢性疼痛和复发的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD010814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2.
7
SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults-a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial.SUMMER 试验:成人小型脐疝中网片与缝合修补的比较-一项前瞻性随机双盲多中心临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05366-7.
8
Lower Risk of Recurrence After Mesh Repair Versus Non-Mesh Sutured Repair in Open Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.网片修补与非网片缝合修补在开放性脐疝修补术中的复发风险较低:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Scand J Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):187-193. doi: 10.1177/1457496918812208. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
9
Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.择期原发性腹疝修补术采用合成网片与缝线修复的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2014 May;149(5):415-21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014.
10
Balancing mesh-related complications and benefits in primary ventral and incisional hernia surgery. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.在原发性腹侧和切口疝手术中平衡网片相关并发症和获益。一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 6;13(6):e0197813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197813. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Onlay mesh versus suture repair for smaller umbilical hernias in adults-early results from SUMMER trial: randomized clinical trial.成人小型脐疝补片修补与缝合修补对比——SUMMER试验早期结果:随机临床试验
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae173.
2
Surgical Decision-Making and Umbilical Hernia Repair Outcomes.手术决策与脐疝修补结果
JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):351-352. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4748.
3
T-line Hernia Mesh Repairs of Large Umbilical Hernias: Technique and Short-term Outcomes.大型脐疝的T型线疝修补网片:技术与短期疗效
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Mar 20;12(3):e5668. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005668. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Short-term complications after onlay versus preperitoneal mesh repair of umbilical hernias: a prospective randomized double-blind trial.腹壁外修补与腹膜前修补脐疝的短期并发症:前瞻性随机双盲试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 20;408(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02802-x.
5
Trocar umbilical hernia repair by open suture repair and open suture-mesh repair in an ambulatory setting in comparison to recurrent and primary umbilical hernia repair.在门诊环境中,通过开放缝合修补术和开放缝合补片修补术进行脐部套管针疝修补术,并与复发性和原发性脐疝修补术进行比较。
J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Sep 2;2020(9):rjaa270. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa270. eCollection 2020 Sep.