• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Could the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Predictive Accuracy Be Affected by Site of Infection?

作者信息

Akinosoglou Karolina, deLastic Anne-Lise, Niarou Vasiliki, Ziazias Dimitrios, Davoulos Christos, Kolosaka Martha, Kosmopoulou Foteini, Theodoraki Spyridoula, Koutsouri Christina-Panagiota, Gogos Charalambos

机构信息

University General Hospital of PatrasPatras, Greece.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 1;202(1):153-154. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0552LE.

DOI:10.1164/rccm.202003-0552LE
PMID:32250647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7328318/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Could the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Predictive Accuracy Be Affected by Site of Infection?快速序贯器官衰竭评估的预测准确性会受到感染部位的影响吗？
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 1;202(1):153-154. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0552LE.
2
Predictive Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Hospital Mortality Decreases With Increasing Comorbidity Burden Among Patients Admitted for Suspected Infection.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染入院患者的住院死亡率预测准确性随合并症负担的增加而降低。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1081-1088. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003815.
3
Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study.巴西快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分的预测准确性：一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):789-798. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC.
4
Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria as Predictors of Critical Care Intervention Among Patients With Suspected Infection.快速序贯器官衰竭评估和全身炎症反应综合征标准作为疑似感染患者重症监护干预预测指标的研究
Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;45(11):1813-1819. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002622.
5
A Comparison of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score and the National Early Warning Score in Non-ICU Patients With/Without Infection.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分与国家早期预警评分在非 ICU 感染/非感染患者中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1923-1933. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003359.
6
The Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil: Insights for Future Use in Diverse Settings.巴西快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估评分：对未来在不同环境中应用的见解。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):755-756. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202001-0058ED.
7
[Diagnosis accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment score for adult sepsis patient with soft tissue infection].[快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对成人软组织感染性脓毒症患者的诊断准确性]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Aug;31(8):933-937. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.08.004.
8
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者：使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层？
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
9
Accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment score to predict mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection in an HIV/AIDS reference centre in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对预测巴西里约热内卢艾滋病毒/艾滋病参考中心住院疑似感染患者死亡率的准确性。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jan;25(1):113.e1-113.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
10
Applicability of Sepsis-3 criteria and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in patients with cirrhosis hospitalised for bacterial infections.Sepsis-3 标准和快速序贯器官衰竭评估在肝硬化合并细菌感染住院患者中的适用性。
Liver Int. 2019 Feb;39(2):307-315. doi: 10.1111/liv.13980. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study.巴西快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分的预测准确性：一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):789-798. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC.
2
How well does qSOFA correspond to underlying systemic inflammatory response?qSOFA 与潜在的全身炎症反应吻合程度如何？
Cytokine. 2018 Oct;110:288-290. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Sepsis-3 in Community-acquired Pneumonia: How Reliable Is It?社区获得性肺炎中的脓毒症3：其可靠性如何？
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb 15;197(4):537. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201707-1414LE.
4
Platelet reactivity in sepsis syndrome: results from the PRESS study.脓毒症综合征中的血小板反应性：PRESS 研究结果。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;36(12):2503-2512. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3093-6. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
New Sepsis Definition (Sepsis-3) and Community-acquired Pneumonia Mortality. A Validation and Clinical Decision-Making Study.新的脓毒症定义 (Sepsis-3) 与社区获得性肺炎死亡率。一项验证和临床决策研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov 15;196(10):1287-1297. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2262OC.
6
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Quick Sequential Organ Function Assessment, and Organ Dysfunction: Insights From a Prospective Database of ED Patients With Infection.全身炎症反应综合征、快速序贯器官功能评估与器官功能障碍：来自急诊感染患者前瞻性数据库的见解
Chest. 2017 Mar;151(3):586-596. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.057. Epub 2016 Nov 19.