• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症综合征中的血小板反应性:PRESS 研究结果。

Platelet reactivity in sepsis syndrome: results from the PRESS study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Patras, 5th Floor, 26504, Rio, Greece.

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, 26504, Rio, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;36(12):2503-2512. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3093-6. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10096-017-3093-6
PMID:28840345
Abstract

Platelet activation mediates systemic inflammatory response during infection. However, data on platelet reactivity (PR) varies among different settings. We assessed PR along different stages of sepsis and tried to predict for determinants of its variance. In parallel, we evaluated it as an early bedside diagnostic biomarker. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Incoming patients were assorted to distinct groups of uncomplicated infection, sepsis, and severe sepsis/septic shock. A control group of healthy volunteers was used as comparison. PR was assessed using the bedside point-of-care VerifyNow assay, in P2Y reaction units (PRU) alongside with levels of major inflammatory markers and whole blood parameters. A total of 101 patients and 27 healthy volunteers were enrolled. PR significantly and reversibly increases during sepsis compared to uncomplicated infection and healthy controls (244 ± 66.7 vs 187.33 ± 60.98, p < 0.001 and 192.17 ± 47.51, p < 0.001, respectively). In severe sepsis, PR did not significantly differ compared to other groups. Sepsis stage uniquely accounts for 15.5% of PR in a linear regression prediction model accounting for 30% of the variance of PR (F = 8.836, p < 0.001). PRU >253 had specificity of 91.2% and sensitivity of 40.8% in discriminating septic from non-septic patients. The addition of PRU to SOFA and qSOFA scores significantly increased their c-statistic (AUC SOFA + PRU, 0.867 vs SOFA, 0.824, p < 0.003 and AUC qSOFA + PRU, 0.842 vs qSOFA, 0.739, p < 0.001), making them comparable (AUC SOFA + PRU vs qSOFA + PRU, p = 0.4). PR significantly and reversibly increases early in sepsis, but seems to exhaust while disease progresses. Bedside assessment of PR can provide robust discriminative accuracy in the early diagnosis of septic patients.

摘要

血小板激活介导感染期间的全身炎症反应。然而,不同环境下血小板反应性(PR)的数据存在差异。我们评估了败血症不同阶段的 PR,并试图预测其变化的决定因素。同时,我们将其评估为早期床边诊断生物标志物。这是一项观察性前瞻性队列研究。入院患者被分为单纯感染、败血症和严重败血症/感染性休克的不同组。健康志愿者的对照组用作比较。使用床边即时检验 VerifyNow 测定法,以血小板反应单位(PRU)以及主要炎症标志物和全血参数评估 PR。共纳入 101 例患者和 27 例健康志愿者。与单纯感染和健康对照组相比,败血症期间 PR 显著且可逆性增加(244±66.7 与 187.33±60.98,p<0.001 和 192.17±47.51,p<0.001)。严重败血症时,PR 与其他组无显著差异。线性回归预测模型中,败血症阶段仅占 PR 的 15.5%,占 PR 方差的 30%(F=8.836,p<0.001)。PRU>253 区分败血症患者和非败血症患者的特异性为 91.2%,敏感性为 40.8%。PRU 添加到 SOFA 和 qSOFA 评分中可显著增加其 c 统计量(SOFA+PRU 的 AUC 为 0.867,与 SOFA 的 AUC 为 0.824,p<0.003 和 qSOFA+PRU 的 AUC 为 0.842,与 qSOFA 的 AUC 为 0.739,p<0.001),使其具有可比性(SOFA+PRU 与 qSOFA+PRU 的 AUC,p=0.4)。PR 在败血症早期显著且可逆性增加,但随着疾病进展似乎耗尽。床边 PR 评估可在败血症患者的早期诊断中提供稳健的鉴别准确性。

相似文献

1
Platelet reactivity in sepsis syndrome: results from the PRESS study.脓毒症综合征中的血小板反应性:PRESS 研究结果。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;36(12):2503-2512. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3093-6. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
A therapeutic window for platelet reactivity for patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-PROVE (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity for Outcome Validation Effort) study.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的血小板反应性治疗窗口:ARMYDA-PROVE(抗血小板治疗减少血管成形术期间心肌损伤-血小板反应性以验证结果)研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar;5(3):281-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.009.
3
[Diagnostic and prognostic value of procalcitonin and common inflammatory markers combining SOFA score in patients with sepsis in early stage].[降钙素原及常见炎症标志物联合序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在脓毒症早期患者中的诊断及预后价值]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Jan;20(1):23-8.
4
Validation of the new Sepsis-3 definitions: proposal for improvement in early risk identification.新Sepsis-3 定义的验证:提高早期风险识别能力的建议。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Feb;23(2):104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
6
Is There an Ideal Level of Platelet P2Y12-Receptor Inhibition in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?: "Window" Analysis From the ADAPT-DES Study (Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板 P2Y12 受体抑制的理想水平是多少?:来自 ADAPT-DES 研究(药物洗脱支架双联抗血小板治疗评估)的“窗口”分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1978-1987. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.032.
7
Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein during systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis and organ dysfunction.全身炎症反应综合征、脓毒症及器官功能障碍时的降钙素原和C反应蛋白
Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R234-42. doi: 10.1186/cc2877. Epub 2004 Jun 10.
8
Improved predictive value of GRACE risk score combined with platelet reactivity for 1-year cardiovascular risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent coronary stent implantation.对于接受冠状动脉支架植入的急性冠状动脉综合征患者,GRACE风险评分联合血小板反应性对1年心血管风险的预测价值得到改善。
Platelets. 2016 Nov;27(7):650-657. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2016.1153618. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分在预测严重脓毒症及死亡率方面表现不佳——一项针对急诊科收治的感染患者的前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 9;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0399-4.
10
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Rotational Thromboelastometric Profile in Early Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study.早期脓毒症的旋转血栓弹力图分析:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 17;12(8):1880. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081880.
2
A time series driven model for early sepsis prediction based on transformer module.一种基于Transformer模块的用于早期脓毒症预测的时间序列驱动模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02138-6.
3
The role of platelets in sepsis: A review.血小板在脓毒症中的作用:综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Sepsis favors high-on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity.脓毒症有利于氯吡格雷高反应性血小板。
Platelets. 2018 Jan;29(1):76-78. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2017.1319919. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
2
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Quick Sequential Organ Function Assessment, and Organ Dysfunction: Insights From a Prospective Database of ED Patients With Infection.全身炎症反应综合征、快速序贯器官功能评估与器官功能障碍:来自急诊感染患者前瞻性数据库的见解
Chest. 2017 Mar;151(3):586-596. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.057. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
3
Vital Signs: Epidemiology of Sepsis: Prevalence of Health Care Factors and Opportunities for Prevention.
Biomol Biomed. 2024 Jan 18;24(4):741-752. doi: 10.17305/bb.2023.10135.
4
Association of Antiretroviral Therapy with Platelet Function and Systemic Inflammatory Response in People Living with HIV: A Cross-Sectional Study.抗逆转录病毒疗法与HIV感染者血小板功能及全身炎症反应的关联:一项横断面研究。
Microorganisms. 2023 Apr 6;11(4):958. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040958.
5
Extracellular vesicles participate in the pathogenesis of sepsis.细胞外囊泡参与脓毒症的发病机制。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Dec 12;12:1018692. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1018692. eCollection 2022.
6
Impact of high platelet turnover on the platelet transcriptome: Results from platelet RNA-sequencing in patients with sepsis.血小板周转率对血小板转录组的影响:脓毒症患者血小板 RNA 测序的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0260222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260222. eCollection 2022.
7
Thrombotic Complications in Patients with COVID-19: Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment.COVID-19 患者的血栓并发症:病理生理机制、诊断和治疗。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Apr;35(2):215-229. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-07084-9. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
8
Point-of-care thrombocyte function testing using multiple-electrode aggregometry in dengue patients: an explorative study.采用多电极聚集法对登革热患者进行即时血小板功能检测:一项探索性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05248-4.
9
Could the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Predictive Accuracy Be Affected by Site of Infection?快速序贯器官衰竭评估的预测准确性会受到感染部位的影响吗?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 1;202(1):153-154. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0552LE.
10
Reduced miR-26b Expression in Megakaryocytes and Platelets Contributes to Elevated Level of Platelet Activation Status in Sepsis.巨核细胞和血小板中 miR-26b 表达减少导致脓毒症血小板活化状态升高。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 29;21(3):866. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030866.
生命体征:脓毒症的流行病学:卫生保健因素的流行情况和预防机会。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Aug 26;65(33):864-9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6533e1.
4
P2Y12 Receptor Modulates Sepsis-Induced Inflammation.P2Y12受体调节脓毒症诱导的炎症反应。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016 May;36(5):961-71. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307401. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
6
Potent irreversible P2Y12 inhibition does not reduce LPS-induced coagulation activation in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,强效不可逆P2Y12抑制并未降低脂多糖诱导的凝血激活。
Clin Sci (Lond). 2016 Mar;130(6):433-40. doi: 10.1042/CS20150591. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
Platelet P2Y12 Inhibitors Reduce Systemic Inflammation and Its Prothrombotic Effects in an Experimental Human Model.血小板P2Y12抑制剂在实验性人体模型中可减轻全身炎症及其促血栓形成作用。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Dec;35(12):2562-70. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306528. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
8
The role of platelets in inflammation.血小板在炎症中的作用。
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Aug 31;114(3):449-58. doi: 10.1160/TH14-12-1067. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
9
Sepsis: a roadmap for future research.脓毒症:未来研究的路线图。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 May;15(5):581-614. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70112-X. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
10
The role of whole blood impedance aggregometry and its utilisation in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis in acute critical illness.全血阻抗聚集测定法的作用及其在急性危重症患者全身性炎症反应综合征和脓毒症诊断及预后中的应用
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e108589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108589. eCollection 2014.