Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Patras, 5th Floor, 26504, Rio, Greece.
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, 26504, Rio, Greece.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;36(12):2503-2512. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3093-6. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
Platelet activation mediates systemic inflammatory response during infection. However, data on platelet reactivity (PR) varies among different settings. We assessed PR along different stages of sepsis and tried to predict for determinants of its variance. In parallel, we evaluated it as an early bedside diagnostic biomarker. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Incoming patients were assorted to distinct groups of uncomplicated infection, sepsis, and severe sepsis/septic shock. A control group of healthy volunteers was used as comparison. PR was assessed using the bedside point-of-care VerifyNow assay, in P2Y reaction units (PRU) alongside with levels of major inflammatory markers and whole blood parameters. A total of 101 patients and 27 healthy volunteers were enrolled. PR significantly and reversibly increases during sepsis compared to uncomplicated infection and healthy controls (244 ± 66.7 vs 187.33 ± 60.98, p < 0.001 and 192.17 ± 47.51, p < 0.001, respectively). In severe sepsis, PR did not significantly differ compared to other groups. Sepsis stage uniquely accounts for 15.5% of PR in a linear regression prediction model accounting for 30% of the variance of PR (F = 8.836, p < 0.001). PRU >253 had specificity of 91.2% and sensitivity of 40.8% in discriminating septic from non-septic patients. The addition of PRU to SOFA and qSOFA scores significantly increased their c-statistic (AUC SOFA + PRU, 0.867 vs SOFA, 0.824, p < 0.003 and AUC qSOFA + PRU, 0.842 vs qSOFA, 0.739, p < 0.001), making them comparable (AUC SOFA + PRU vs qSOFA + PRU, p = 0.4). PR significantly and reversibly increases early in sepsis, but seems to exhaust while disease progresses. Bedside assessment of PR can provide robust discriminative accuracy in the early diagnosis of septic patients.
血小板激活介导感染期间的全身炎症反应。然而,不同环境下血小板反应性(PR)的数据存在差异。我们评估了败血症不同阶段的 PR,并试图预测其变化的决定因素。同时,我们将其评估为早期床边诊断生物标志物。这是一项观察性前瞻性队列研究。入院患者被分为单纯感染、败血症和严重败血症/感染性休克的不同组。健康志愿者的对照组用作比较。使用床边即时检验 VerifyNow 测定法,以血小板反应单位(PRU)以及主要炎症标志物和全血参数评估 PR。共纳入 101 例患者和 27 例健康志愿者。与单纯感染和健康对照组相比,败血症期间 PR 显著且可逆性增加(244±66.7 与 187.33±60.98,p<0.001 和 192.17±47.51,p<0.001)。严重败血症时,PR 与其他组无显著差异。线性回归预测模型中,败血症阶段仅占 PR 的 15.5%,占 PR 方差的 30%(F=8.836,p<0.001)。PRU>253 区分败血症患者和非败血症患者的特异性为 91.2%,敏感性为 40.8%。PRU 添加到 SOFA 和 qSOFA 评分中可显著增加其 c 统计量(SOFA+PRU 的 AUC 为 0.867,与 SOFA 的 AUC 为 0.824,p<0.003 和 qSOFA+PRU 的 AUC 为 0.842,与 qSOFA 的 AUC 为 0.739,p<0.001),使其具有可比性(SOFA+PRU 与 qSOFA+PRU 的 AUC,p=0.4)。PR 在败血症早期显著且可逆性增加,但随着疾病进展似乎耗尽。床边 PR 评估可在败血症患者的早期诊断中提供稳健的鉴别准确性。