Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jun 3;102(11):953-960. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01166.
Unused opioid pills are a danger to patients and their loved ones as they may be diverted for abuse or misuse. The purpose of this study was to determine the baseline rate of proper disposal of unused opioids among patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty and to determine how education impacts disposal rates.
In this study, 563 patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (183 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 293 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, and 87 patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty) were cluster-randomized to groups that received no education, educational pamphlets, or educational pamphlets plus text messages. Patients were randomized by education class and were blinded to participation to avoid behavioral modifications. Patients were surveyed at 6 weeks postoperatively to determine if they disposed of their unused opioid pills using a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-recommended method, which was the primary outcome. Assuming a 15% difference in opioid disposal rates as clinically relevant, power analysis determined that 76 patients with unused opioids were required per group (228 total). An as-treated analysis was conducted with the Fisher exact text and analysis of variance with alpha = 0.05.
A total of 539 patients (95.7%) completed the survey, and 342 patients (63.5%) had unused opioid pills at 6 weeks postoperatively: 89 patients in the no education group, 128 patients in the pamphlet group, and 125 patients in the pamphlet and text message group. Of these 342 patients, 9.0% of patients in the no education group, 32.8% of patients in the pamphlet group, and 38.4% of patients in the pamphlet and text message group properly disposed of their unused opioids (p = 0.001 for each educational intervention compared with no education). Unused opioid pills were kept by 82.0% of patients in the no education group, 64.1% of patients in the pamphlet group, and 54.4% of patients in the pamphlet and text message group (p < 0.001 for the no education group compared with either educational strategy group). Patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty were more likely to properly dispose of their unused opioids compared with those who underwent total knee arthroplasty (odds ratio, 2.1; p = 0.005). There were no demographic differences between groups, including inpatient opioid use, refills, and preoperative opioid use, other than sex (41.5% male patients in the no education group, 55.0% male patients in the pamphlet group, and 37.4% male patients in the pamphlet and text message group; p = 0.001), suggesting appropriate randomization.
The rate of opioid disposal is very low after total joint arthroplasty. Education on opioid disposal more than triples opioid disposal rates compared with no education. To help to prevent diversion of unused opioid pills, all patients who undergo total joint arthroplasty should be educated on the proper disposal of unused opioids.
未使用的阿片类药物对患者及其家属来说是一种危险,因为它们可能被转移用于滥用或误用。本研究的目的是确定在接受全关节置换术的患者中未使用阿片类药物正确处理的基线率,并确定教育如何影响处理率。
在这项研究中,563 名接受初次全关节置换术的患者(183 名接受全髋关节置换术,293 名接受全膝关节置换术,87 名接受单髁膝关节置换术)被分为接受无教育、教育小册子或教育小册子加短信的组。患者按教育班随机分组,并对参与情况进行盲法,以避免行为改变。患者在术后 6 周接受调查,以确定他们是否使用美国食品和药物管理局推荐的方法处理未使用的阿片类药物,这是主要结果。假设在阿片类药物处理率上有 15%的差异具有临床意义,功效分析确定每组需要 76 名有未使用阿片类药物的患者(共 228 名)。采用 Fisher 精确检验和方差分析进行治疗分析,α=0.05。
共有 539 名患者(95.7%)完成了调查,342 名患者(63.5%)在术后 6 周时仍有未使用的阿片类药物:无教育组 89 名,小册子组 128 名,小册子和短信组 125 名。在这 342 名患者中,无教育组 9.0%、小册子组 32.8%和小册子和短信组 38.4%的患者正确处理了未使用的阿片类药物(与无教育相比,每个教育干预组的 p 值均为 0.001)。无教育组 82.0%、小册子组 64.1%和小册子和短信组 54.4%的患者保留了未使用的阿片类药物(与无教育组相比,p 值均 <0.001)。接受全髋关节置换术的患者比接受全膝关节置换术的患者更有可能正确处理未使用的阿片类药物(比值比,2.1;p=0.005)。除性别外(无教育组 41.5%的男性患者,小册子组 55.0%的男性患者,小册子和短信组 37.4%的男性患者;p=0.001),各组之间在人口统计学方面没有差异,包括住院阿片类药物使用、续药和术前阿片类药物使用,这表明分组是恰当的。
全关节置换术后阿片类药物的处理率非常低。与无教育相比,关于阿片类药物处理的教育使阿片类药物处理率增加了两倍以上。为了帮助防止未使用的阿片类药物的转移,所有接受全关节置换术的患者都应该接受关于未使用阿片类药物正确处理的教育。