Department of Anesthesia, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China -
Department of Anesthesia, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Sep;86(9):965-973. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14251-2. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and postoperative delirium (POD) are common postoperative complications in elderly patients. The effect of anesthesia depth on cognitive function remains unknown. We aimed to assess the correlations between anesthesia depth, cognitive function, and inflammation.
Literature searches were conducted on Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries until August 2019. All studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The STATA 15.0 and trial sequential analysis (TSA) version 0.9.5.10 beta software were used for data analysis. POD and POCD were calculated using a random-effects model. The combined effect estimates are expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Ten RCTs involving 3142 patients met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of POCD in the light anesthesia group was significantly lower than the deep anesthesia group on days 1 (RR=0.14, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.45; I=0.00, P>0.10), and 90 (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.96; I=0.00,P>0.10). Light anesthesia significantly reduced the risk of POD (RR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.82; I=0.00, P>0.10). There was no statistical difference in the Mini-Mental State Examination score between the groups on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference (SMD)= 0.04, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.33; I=0.00, P>0.10).The TSA found that there was insufficient evidence on the effect of anesthesia depth on POCD, but that the conclusions on POD were reliable.
Light anesthesia was associated with a decrease in POD and may promote better neurocognitive function postoperatively in comparison with deep anesthesia.
术后认知功能障碍(POCD)和术后谵妄(POD)是老年患者常见的术后并发症。麻醉深度对认知功能的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估麻醉深度、认知功能和炎症之间的相关性。
我们在 Web of Science、PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了文献检索,检索时间截至 2019 年 8 月。所有研究均为随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 STATA 15.0 和试验序贯分析(TSA)版本 0.9.5.10 beta 软件进行数据分析。使用随机效应模型计算 POD 和 POCD。合并效应估计值表示为风险比(RR),置信区间(CI)为 95%。
10 项 RCT 纳入了 3142 名患者,符合纳入标准。Meta 分析表明,轻麻醉组在第 1 天(RR=0.14,95%CI:0.04 至 0.45;I=0.00,P>0.10)和第 90 天(RR=0.72,95%CI:0.54 至 0.96;I=0.00,P>0.10)的 POCD 发生率显著低于深麻醉组。轻麻醉显著降低 POD 的风险(RR=0.69,95%CI:0.58 至 0.82;I=0.00,P>0.10)。两组在术后第 1 天的简易精神状态检查评分无统计学差异(标准化均数差(SMD)=0.04,95%CI:-0.25 至 0.33;I=0.00,P>0.10)。TSA 发现,麻醉深度对 POCD 的影响证据不足,但 POD 的结论是可靠的。
与深麻醉相比,轻麻醉与 POD 降低相关,并且可能在术后促进更好的神经认知功能。