Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.
Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Dec 5;135(23):2805-2814. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002449.
Whether anesthetic depth affects postoperative outcomes remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of deep vs. light anesthesia on postoperative pain, cognitive function, recovery from anesthesia, complications, and mortality.
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched until January 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing deep and light anesthesia in adult surgical patients. The co-primary outcomes were postoperative pain and delirium (assessed using the confusion assessment method). We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. We assessed publication bias using the Begg's rank correlation test and Egger's linear regression. We evaluated the evidence using the trial sequential analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. We conducted subgroup analyses for pain scores at different postoperative time points and delirium according to cardiac or non-cardiac surgery.
A total of 26 trials with 10,743 patients were included. Deep anesthesia compared with light anesthesia (a mean difference in bispectral index of -12 to -11) was associated with lower pain scores at rest at 0 to 1 h postoperatively (weighted mean difference = -0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.25 to -0.18, P = 0.009; moderate-quality evidence) and an increased incidence of postoperative delirium (24.95% vs. 15.92%; risk ratio = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.28-1.91, P < 0.0001; high-quality evidence). No publication bias was detected. For the exploratory secondary outcomes, deep anesthesia was associated with prolonged postoperative recovery, without affecting neurocognitive outcomes, major complications, or mortality. In the subgroup analyses, the deep anesthesia group had lower pain scores at rest and on movement during 24 h postoperatively, without statistically significant subgroup differences, and deep anesthesia was associated with an increased incidence of delirium after non-cardiac and cardiac surgeries, without statistically significant subgroup differences.
Deep anesthesia reduced early postoperative pain but increased postoperative delirium. The current evidence does not support the use of deep anesthesia in clinical practice.
麻醉深度是否会影响术后结果仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估深度麻醉与轻度麻醉对术后疼痛、认知功能、麻醉恢复、并发症和死亡率的影响。
检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 数据库,截至 2022 年 1 月,以比较成人外科手术患者深度麻醉与轻度麻醉的随机对照试验。主要共同结局是术后疼痛和谵妄(采用意识模糊评估法评估)。我们使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们使用 Begg 等级相关检验和 Egger 线性回归评估发表偏倚。我们使用试验序贯分析和推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估证据。我们对不同术后时间点的疼痛评分和根据心脏或非心脏手术的谵妄进行了亚组分析。
共纳入 26 项试验,共 10743 例患者。与轻度麻醉相比,深度麻醉(脑电双频指数差值为-12 至-11)与术后 0 至 1 小时静息时的疼痛评分较低相关(加权均数差=-0.72,95%置信区间[CI]:-1.25 至-0.18,P=0.009;中等质量证据),且术后谵妄发生率增加(24.95%比 15.92%;风险比=1.57,95%CI:1.28-1.91,P<0.0001;高质量证据)。未发现发表偏倚。对于探索性次要结局,深度麻醉与术后恢复时间延长相关,但不影响神经认知结局、主要并发症或死亡率。在亚组分析中,深度麻醉组在术后 24 小时内静息和活动时的疼痛评分较低,但无统计学显著差异,且深度麻醉与非心脏和心脏手术后谵妄发生率增加相关,但无统计学显著差异。
深度麻醉可减轻术后早期疼痛,但增加术后谵妄。目前的证据不支持在临床实践中使用深度麻醉。