Suppr超能文献

免疫检查点阻断治疗后复发转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌的化疗。

Chemotherapy after immune checkpoint blockade in patients with recurrent, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, United States.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2020 Jun;105:104676. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104676. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Given that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now preferred agents in first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), we retrospectively studied outcomes on post-ICI therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected data from the medical records of 60 patients with R/M SCCHN who received ICIs followed by at least one further line of cytotoxic or biologic therapy at our institution from 2014 to 2019. We also compared outcomes with those of historical trials in the ICI-naïve, second-line or greater setting.

RESULTS

Patients who received platinum-based regimens as their post-ICI therapies experienced improved overall response (ORR) (50% versus 10%, p < 0.01) and improved overall survival (OS) (15.1 months versus 7.3 months, HR 0.46, p = 0.04) compared to the rest of the cohort. Patients receiving platinum re-challenge were more likely to respond than all other patients in the cohort (OR 8.37, p = 0.01). The ORR for patients on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing regimens (63%) was also higher than other patients in the cohort (p = 0.03). Immunotherapy-based regimens compared favorably to historical data of first exposure to ICIs (disease control rate 54% versus 36%). Singlet regimens were associated with shorter OS than other regimens (HR = 2.38, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Platinum- and 5-FU-based doublet or triplet regimens may be superior options in the post-ICI setting. Immunotherapy re-challenge following ICI therapy may also be a reasonable option.

摘要

目的

鉴于免疫检查点抑制剂 (ICI) 现已成为复发性/转移性 (R/M) 头颈部鳞状细胞癌 (SCCHN) 一线治疗的首选药物,我们回顾性研究了 ICI 治疗后的治疗结果。

材料和方法

我们从 2014 年至 2019 年在我们机构接受 ICI 治疗后至少接受过一线细胞毒性或生物治疗的 60 例 R/M SCCHN 患者的病历中收集数据。我们还将这些结果与 ICI 初治、二线及以上患者的历史试验结果进行了比较。

结果

与其他队列相比,接受铂类方案作为 post-ICI 治疗的患者的总体缓解率 (ORR)(50% 与 10%,p<0.01)和总体生存 (OS)(15.1 个月与 7.3 个月,HR 0.46,p=0.04)均有所改善。接受铂类再挑战的患者比队列中的其他患者更有可能有反应(OR 8.37,p=0.01)。含 5-氟尿嘧啶 (5-FU) 方案的患者(63%)的 ORR 也高于队列中的其他患者(p=0.03)。与 ICI 首次暴露的历史数据相比,基于免疫疗法的方案表现良好(疾病控制率 54% 与 36%)。单药方案与其他方案相比,OS 更短(HR=2.38,p=0.01)。

结论

基于铂类和 5-FU 的双联或三联方案可能是 post-ICI 治疗的更好选择。ICI 治疗后免疫治疗再挑战也可能是一个合理的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验