Emergency and Critical Care Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Trauma and Critical Care Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Allergol Int. 2020 Jul;69(3):424-428. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
Current guidelines recommend that any patient who has experienced anaphylaxis should be prescribed one or more epinephrine autoinjectors (EAI) for immediate self-treatment. However, the etiology of anaphylaxis and prescription patterns of EAI have not been widely examined in Japan.
This was a retrospective cohort study using a large Japanese claims database (JMDC, Tokyo, Japan). We included patients with severe anaphylaxis who received epinephrine in a hospital or outpatient clinic from 2011 to 2016. We extracted patients who were prescribed EAIs and examined the annual trend of EAI prescription rates and refill patterns.
We identified 1255 eligible patients. Among them, 361 patients (28.8%) were prescribed EAIs within 30 days after their initial severe anaphylactic episode. In patients who were prescribed EAIs, 65.9% were prescribed EAIs from the same facility in which initial treatment was given for severe anaphylaxis. The prescription rates of EAI significantly increased from 11.1% in 2011 to 30.9% in 2016. Among patients with initial EAI prescriptions, 97.3% refilled their EAI prescriptions at least once and 40.5% refilled their prescriptions annually during the 3 year follow up period.
EAI prescription rates were relatively low in patients who experienced severe anaphylaxis in Japan. Physicians should prescribe EAIs to all patients who were treated for anaphylaxis under their care and avoid delegating the responsibility of prescribing EAIs to other facilities. Initial prescription of EAIs can result in improved regular refill and dissemination practices.
目前的指南建议,任何经历过过敏反应的患者都应开具一种或多种肾上腺素自动注射器(EAI)以备立即进行自我治疗。然而,在日本,尚未广泛研究过敏反应的病因和 EAI 的处方模式。
这是一项使用大型日本索赔数据库(JMDC,东京,日本)的回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了 2011 年至 2016 年期间在医院或门诊接受肾上腺素治疗的严重过敏反应患者。我们提取了开具 EAI 的患者,并检查了 EAI 处方率和补充模式的年度趋势。
我们确定了 1255 名符合条件的患者。其中,361 名患者(28.8%)在初次严重过敏反应发作后 30 天内开具了 EAI。在开具 EAI 的患者中,65.9%是在最初给予严重过敏反应治疗的同一医疗机构开具 EAI。EAI 的处方率从 2011 年的 11.1%显著增加到 2016 年的 30.9%。在初次开具 EAI 处方的患者中,97.3%至少一次补充了 EAI 处方,并且在 3 年随访期间有 40.5%的患者每年补充 EAI 处方。
在日本,经历过严重过敏反应的患者中 EAI 的处方率相对较低。医生应为接受过敏反应治疗的所有患者开具 EAI,并避免将 EAI 的开具责任转交给其他医疗机构。EAI 的初次开具可导致改善定期补充和传播实践。