Agostinone Piero, Di Paolo Stefano, Grassi Alberto, Pinelli Erika, Bontempi Marco, Bragonzoni Laura, Zaffagnini Stefano
Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie DIBINEM, Università di Bologna, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, BO, Italy.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Feb;29(2):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05979-6. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
The role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in knee biomechanics in vivo and under weight-bearing is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the tibiofemoral kinematics of ACL-deficient knees to healthy contralateral ones during the execution of weight-bearing activities.
Eight patients with isolated ACL injury and healthy contralateral knees were included in the study. Patients were asked to perform a single step forward and a single leg squat first with the injured knee and then with the contralateral one. Knee motion was determined using a validated model-based tracking process that matched subject-specific MRI bone models to dynamic biplane radiographic images, under the principles of Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). Data processing was performed in a specific software developed in Matlab.
Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for single leg squat along the frontal plane: ACL-deficient knees showed a more varus angle, especially at the highest knee flexion angles (40°-50° on average), compared to the contralateral knees. Furthermore, ACL-deficient knees showed tibial medialization along the entire task, while contralateral knees were always laterally aligned. This difference became statistically relevant (p < 0.05) for knee flexion angles included between 0° and about 30°.
ACL-deficient knees showed an abnormal tibial medialization and increased varus angle during single leg squat when compared to the contralateral knees. These biomechanical anomalies could cause a different force distribution on tibial plateau, explaining the higher risk of early osteoarthritis in ACL deficiency. The clinical relevance of this study is that also safe activities used in ACL rehabilitation protocols are significantly altered in ACL deficiency.
III.
前交叉韧带(ACL)在体内负重状态下对膝关节生物力学的作用仍不明确。本研究的目的是比较ACL损伤膝关节与对侧健康膝关节在负重活动过程中的胫股关节运动学情况。
本研究纳入了8例单纯ACL损伤患者及其对侧健康膝关节。要求患者先使用受伤膝关节进行一次向前单步和一次单腿下蹲动作,然后再用对侧膝关节重复上述动作。膝关节运动通过一种经过验证的基于模型的跟踪过程来确定,该过程在X线立体摄影测量分析(RSA)原理下,将个体特异性MRI骨模型与动态双平面X线图像进行匹配。数据处理在Matlab开发的特定软件中进行。
在单腿下蹲动作中,沿额状面发现了具有统计学意义的差异(p < 0.05):与对侧膝关节相比,ACL损伤膝关节呈现出更大的内翻角度,尤其是在膝关节最大屈曲角度时(平均40° - 50°)。此外,ACL损伤膝关节在整个动作过程中表现出胫骨内移,而对侧膝关节始终保持外侧对齐。对于0°至约30°之间的膝关节屈曲角度,这种差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。
与对侧膝关节相比,ACL损伤膝关节在单腿下蹲时表现出异常的胫骨内移和增大的内翻角度。这些生物力学异常可能导致胫骨平台上不同的力分布,解释了ACL损伤时早期骨关节炎风险较高的原因。本研究的临床意义在于,ACL康复方案中使用的安全活动在ACL损伤时也会发生显著改变。
III级。