Suppr超能文献

内侧半月板后角缝合对前交叉韧带重建膝关节胫骨内外旋转的影响。

Medial Meniscal Posterior Horn Suturing Influences Tibial Internal-External Rotation in ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

作者信息

Grassi Alberto, Agostinone Piero, Paolo Stefano Di, Lucidi Gian Andrea, Pinelli Erika, Marchiori Gregorio, Bontempi Marco, Bragonzoni Laura, Zaffagnini Stefano

机构信息

Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Dipartimento di Scienze per la Qualità della Vita QuVi, University of Bologna, Rimini, Italy.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jul 27;11(7):23259671231177596. doi: 10.1177/23259671231177596. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of meniscal lesions and repair in combination with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction has not been extensively investigated in vivo and under weightbearing conditions.

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to (1) compare the in vivo knee kinematics between patients with ACL tear and those with combined ACL and medial meniscal tears and (2) investigate kinematic differences between isolated ACL reconstruction and ACL reconstruction plus medial meniscal repair (MR). It was hypothesized that concomitant posterior horn medial meniscal tear and ACL deficiency would affect knee internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior translation but MR would restore these parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Nineteen patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included: 10 had intact menisci (IM group) and 9 had a medial meniscal injury that was repaired during ACL reconstruction using an all-inside technique (MR group). Preoperatively and 18 months postoperatively, active knee kinematics under weightbearing conditions was evaluated during a single-leg squat using a dynamic biplane x-ray imaging system. The general linear model was used to investigate the differences between group (IM vs MR) and time (preoperative vs follow-up) and their interactions.

RESULTS

Tibial internal rotation was higher in the MR group than the IM group both before and after surgery ( = .007). Knee valgus rotation was higher in the MR group preoperatively ( < .001), while no differences were found postoperatively because of an increase of valgus rotation in the IM group, which was significant in the descendant phase ( < .001). Preoperatively, the IM group showed a more medial tibial translation compared with the MR group in the descendant phase ( = .006).

CONCLUSION

When performing a single-leg squat, patients with ACL-deficient knees and a medial meniscal tear demonstrated a more valgus rotation, tibial internal rotation, and lateral tibial translation versus those with intact menisci. After ACL reconstruction and MR, these patients demonstrated significantly higher tibial internal rotation when compared with patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons should be aware that MR does not fully restore knee kinematics in vivo and under weightbearing conditions in the context of ACL reconstruction.

摘要

背景

半月板损伤及修复与前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤及重建相结合的作用,尚未在体内及负重条件下进行广泛研究。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)比较ACL撕裂患者与ACL合并内侧半月板撕裂患者的体内膝关节运动学;(2)研究单纯ACL重建与ACL重建加内侧半月板修复(MR)之间的运动学差异。假设后角内侧半月板撕裂合并ACL缺损会影响膝关节的内外旋转及前后平移,但MR可恢复这些参数。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

纳入19例行ACL重建的患者:10例半月板完整(IM组),9例内侧半月板损伤,在ACL重建期间采用全内置技术进行修复(MR组)。术前及术后18个月,使用动态双平面X线成像系统在单腿深蹲过程中评估负重条件下的主动膝关节运动学。采用一般线性模型研究组间(IM组与MR组)和时间(术前与随访)差异及其交互作用。

结果

术前及术后,MR组的胫骨内旋均高于IM组(P = 0.007)。术前MR组的膝关节外翻旋转较高(P < 0.001),术后未发现差异,因为IM组外翻旋转增加,在下降期显著(P < 0.001)。术前,在下降期IM组的胫骨内移比MR组更明显(P = 0.006)。

结论

在进行单腿深蹲时,与半月板完整的患者相比,ACL缺损合并内侧半月板撕裂的患者表现出更多的外翻旋转、胫骨内旋和胫骨外移。在ACL重建和MR后,与单纯ACL重建的患者相比,这些患者的胫骨内旋明显更高。

临床意义

外科医生应意识到,在ACL重建的情况下,MR不能在体内及负重条件下完全恢复膝关节运动学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad77/10387796/6f209ca47995/10.1177_23259671231177596-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验