• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种喙锁韧带重建方法的比较:有限元分析

Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis.

作者信息

Çalışal Emre, Uğur Levent

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Amasya University, School of Medicine, Amasya, Turkey.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amasya University, School of Technology, Amasya, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Mar;54(2):202-206. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.288.

DOI:10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.288
PMID:32254037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7286163/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare two different tendon grafting techniques for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction from the data obtained using finite element analysis.

METHODS

Three different finite element models of the shoulder girdle were formulated using computerized tomography images: the reference model, coracoid loop technique (CLT), and drilling technique (DT) model. In all these models, forces were applied to the clavicle along three axes (x, y, and z) of the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Thereafter, data regarding the loading values of the tendon grafts, loads on the coracoid base, and coracoclavicular vertical distance were measured.

RESULTS

While the reference model yielded the lowest values for all the loading conditions as well as the shortest coracoclavicular distance, the DT model demonstrated the highest values for all the loading conditions and the largest coracoclavicular distance.

CONCLUSION

Different tendon grafting techniques may offer different loading values on both bone surface and tendon graft during coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. The drilling technique may be associated with increased loading on the tendon graft and bone surface, causing further loss of reduction and consequent complications.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过有限元分析获得的数据,比较两种不同的肌腱移植技术用于喙锁韧带重建的效果。

方法

利用计算机断层扫描图像建立了三种不同的肩带有限元模型:参考模型、喙突环技术(CLT)模型和钻孔技术(DT)模型。在所有这些模型中,沿着斜方肌和胸锁乳突肌的三个轴(x、y和z)向锁骨施加力。此后,测量了肌腱移植物的加载值、喙突基部的负荷以及喙锁垂直距离的数据。

结果

参考模型在所有加载条件下产生的数值最低,喙锁距离最短,而DT模型在所有加载条件下显示出最高的数值和最大的喙锁距离。

结论

在喙锁韧带重建过程中,不同的肌腱移植技术可能在骨表面和肌腱移植物上提供不同的加载值。钻孔技术可能与肌腱移植物和骨表面的负荷增加有关,导致复位进一步丢失并引发并发症。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis.两种喙锁韧带重建方法的比较:有限元分析
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Mar;54(2):202-206. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.288.
2
Evaluation of the clavicular tunnel placement on coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocations: a finite element analysis.锁骨隧道位置对肩锁关节脱位喙锁韧带重建效果的评估:有限元分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1891-1896. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3789-y. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
3
The effect of distal clavicle excision on in situ graft forces in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.锁骨远端切除对喙锁韧带重建中原位移植物受力的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2313-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546510374447. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
4
[Finite element analysis of different reconstruction methods of coracoclavicular ligament for acromioclavicular joint dislocation].肩锁关节脱位喙锁韧带不同重建方法的有限元分析
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 Jun 25;36(6):543-9. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.06.008.
5
Coracoid bypass procedure: surgical technique for coracoclavicular reconstruction with coracoid insufficiency.喙突搭桥手术:用于治疗喙突功能不全的喙锁重建手术技术
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):679-686. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
6
Radiographic alterations in clavicular bone tunnel width following anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries.锁骨骨隧道宽度在解剖型喙锁韧带重建(ACCR)治疗慢性肩锁关节损伤后的影像学改变。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2046-2054. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05980-z. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
7
Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft.使用单根肌腱移植物同时进行肩锁关节和喙锁韧带的解剖重建。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Sep;22(9):2216-22. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2569-x. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Complications after anatomic fixation and reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.喙锁韧带解剖固定重建术后的并发症。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2896-903. doi: 10.1177/0363546513502459. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
9
Clinical results of single-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus tendon.采用自体半腱肌腱行单隧道喙锁韧带重建术的临床疗效。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 May;38(5):950-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546509356976. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
10
Anatomic Tunnel Placement Is Not Feasible by Transclavicular-Transcoracoid Drilling Technique for Coracoclavicular Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.经锁骨-喙突钻孔技术进行喙锁间重建的解剖隧道置钉不可行:一项尸体研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2012-2017. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual plate has better biomechanical stability than hook plate or superior single plate for the fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures: a finite element analysis.双钢板固定治疗不稳定型锁骨远端骨折的生物力学稳定性优于钩钢板或单钢板:有限元分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):4805-4812. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04801-5. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
Evaluation of the coracoid bone tunnel placement on Dog Bone™ button fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a cadaver study combined with finite element analysis.评价 Dog Bone™ 纽扣固定肩锁关节脱位中喙突骨隧道位置:尸体研究结合有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jan 9;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06119-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Concepts in the Operative Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative Techniques.当前肩锁关节脱位手术治疗的理念:手术技术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;47(11):2745-2758. doi: 10.1177/0363546518795147. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
2
Shoulder Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Injuries: Common Problems and Solutions.肩部肩锁和喙锁韧带损伤:常见问题与解决方案
Clin Sports Med. 2018 Apr;37(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2017.12.002.
3
A prospective study of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with autogenous peroneus longus tendon for acromioclavicular joint dislocations.前瞻性研究采用自体腓骨长肌腱重建喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6):e178-e188. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Biomechanical analysis of clavicle hook plate implantation with different hook angles in the acromioclavicular joint.不同钩角度锁骨钩钢板植入肩锁关节的生物力学分析
Int Orthop. 2017 Aug;41(8):1663-1669. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3384-z. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
Coracoid fracture with recurrent AC joint separation after Tightrope repair of AC joint dislocation.肩锁关节脱位经Tightrope修复术后并发喙突骨折伴复发性肩锁关节分离。
Radiol Case Rep. 2015 Nov 6;6(4):624. doi: 10.2484/rcr.v6i4.624. eCollection 2011.
6
Radiographic failure and rates of re-operation after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a comparison of surgical techniques.肩锁关节重建术后的影像学失败及再次手术率:手术技术比较
Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):512-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.35935.
7
Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicenter study of 116 cases.关节镜下急性肩锁关节脱位固定术后的并发症发生率及失败类型。116例前瞻性多中心研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8 Suppl):S313-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with clavicle hook plates in different lengths.不同长度锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的生物力学分析
Int Orthop. 2015 Nov;39(11):2239-44. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2890-8. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Outcome After Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments Using a Double-Bundle Coracoid Cerclage Technique.使用双束喙突环扎技术进行关节镜下喙锁韧带重建后的疗效
Arthroscopy. 2015 Oct;31(10):1933-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 May 23.
10
Titanium Elastic Nail (TEN) versus Reconstruction Plate Repair of Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Finite Element Study.钛弹性髓内钉(TEN)与重建钢板修复锁骨中段骨折的有限元研究
PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0126131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126131. eCollection 2015.