• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助药物在小儿腺样体扁桃体切除术后七氟醚相关苏醒躁动中的疗效比较:一项贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of ancillary drugs in sevoflurane-related emergence agitation after paediatric adenotonsillectomy: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Linyi Cancer Hospital, Linyi City, China.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Oct;45(5):1039-1049. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13133. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1111/jcpt.13133
PMID:32255203
Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The comparative efficacy of ancillary drugs on sevoflurane-related emergence agitation (EA) in paediatric anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy remains unclear. The purpose of this Bayesian network meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of ancillary drugs on sevoflurane-related EA in paediatric anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different ancillary drugs used in adenotonsillectomy from inception to April 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Subsequently, a network meta-analysis was performed using the R software and RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We included 25 RCTs, involving 2151 participants. The proportion of patients with sevoflurane-related EA was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine, ketamine, propofol, fentanyl, midazolam, sufentanil, remifentanil and clonidine groups than in the placebo group (P < .05). Fentanyl was superior to sufentanil (P < .05), whereas dexmedetomidine was superior to fentanyl (P < .05). Among ancillary drugs, dexmedetomidine (90.04%) showed the highest possibility of reducing the risk of EA, followed by fentanyl (87.45%), remifentanil (63.85%), ketamine (52.07%), midazolam (51.27%), clonidine (49.94%), propofol (29.89%), sufentanil (21.38%) and placebo (4.09%).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that the effects of dexmedetomidine in reducing the risk of sevoflurane-related EA in paediatric anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy were better than the effects of other drugs. However, large, high-quality RCTs are required to further confirm this.

摘要

已知和目的

在小儿扁桃体腺样体切除术的全身麻醉中,辅助药物对七氟醚相关苏醒期躁动(EA)的比较疗效尚不清楚。本贝叶斯网状荟萃分析的目的是研究辅助药物对小儿扁桃体腺样体切除术全身麻醉中七氟醚相关 EA 的疗效。

方法

通过电子检索 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库,从建库至 2019 年 4 月,检索了不同辅助药物用于扁桃体腺样体切除术的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名审查员独立筛选文献、提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。随后,使用 R 软件和 RevMan 5.3 软件进行网络荟萃分析。

结果和讨论

我们纳入了 25 项 RCT,涉及 2151 名参与者。与安慰剂组相比,右美托咪定、氯胺酮、异丙酚、芬太尼、咪达唑仑、舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼和可乐定组的七氟醚相关 EA 患者比例明显降低(P<0.05)。芬太尼优于舒芬太尼(P<0.05),而右美托咪定优于芬太尼(P<0.05)。在辅助药物中,右美托咪定(90.04%)降低 EA 风险的可能性最高,其次是芬太尼(87.45%)、瑞芬太尼(63.85%)、氯胺酮(52.07%)、咪达唑仑(51.27%)、可乐定(49.94%)、异丙酚(29.89%)、舒芬太尼(21.38%)和安慰剂(4.09%)。

新内容和结论

有证据表明,右美托咪定在降低小儿扁桃体腺样体切除术全身麻醉中七氟醚相关 EA 风险方面的效果优于其他药物。然而,需要更大规模、高质量的 RCT 进一步证实这一点。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of ancillary drugs in sevoflurane-related emergence agitation after paediatric adenotonsillectomy: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.辅助药物在小儿腺样体扁桃体切除术后七氟醚相关苏醒躁动中的疗效比较:一项贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Oct;45(5):1039-1049. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13133. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
2
Effect of ancillary drugs on sevoflurane related emergence agitation in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.辅助药物对小儿眼科手术中七氟醚相关苏醒期躁动的影响:一项贝叶斯网状meta 分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 1;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0810-y.
3
Preventing Emergence Agitation Using Ancillary Drugs with Sevoflurane for Pediatric Anesthesia: A Network Meta-Analysis.辅助药物预防七氟醚用于小儿麻醉时的苏醒期躁动:网状 Meta 分析。
Mol Neurobiol. 2017 Nov;54(9):7312-7326. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-0229-0. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
4
Effects of sevoflurane versus other general anaesthesia on emergence agitation in children.七氟醚与其他全身麻醉对儿童苏醒期躁动的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 12;2014(9):CD007084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007084.pub2.
5
Network Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam, Ketamine, Propofol, and Fentanyl for the Prevention of Sevoflurane-Related Emergence Agitation in Children.右美托咪定、咪达唑仑、氯胺酮、丙泊酚和芬太尼预防儿童七氟醚相关苏醒期躁动疗效的网状Meta分析
Am J Ther. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(4):e1032-42. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000321.
6
μ-Opioid agonists for preventing emergence agitation under sevoflurane anesthesia in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.用于预防儿童七氟醚麻醉下苏醒期躁动的μ-阿片类激动剂:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Feb;26(2):139-50. doi: 10.1111/pan.12815. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
7
The effects of dexmedetomidine and tramadol on post-operative pain and agitation, and extubation quality in paediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery: A randomized trial.右美托咪定和曲马多对行腺样体切除术的小儿患者术后疼痛和躁动及拔管质量的影响:一项随机试验。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Apr;45(2):340-346. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13080. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Ketofol performance to reduce postoperative emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.氟烷在儿童腺样体扁桃体切除术后减少苏醒期躁动的作用。
Libyan J Med. 2020 Dec;15(1):1688450. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2019.1688450.
9
Meta-analysis of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia: different administration and different dosage.右美托咪定对七氟醚麻醉后儿童苏醒期躁动及恢复情况影响的Meta分析:不同给药方式及不同剂量
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123728. eCollection 2015.
10
Dexmedetomidine vs. total intravenous anaesthesia in paediatric emergence delirium: A network meta-analysis.右美托咪定与全凭静脉麻醉在小儿苏醒性谵妄中的比较:一项网状荟萃分析。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Nov 1;38(11):1111-1123. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001490.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing adjuvant strategies for sevoflurane-related emergence delirium: a Bayesian network meta-analysis in pediatric surgery.优化七氟烷相关苏醒期谵妄的辅助策略:小儿外科的贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 4;16:1573640. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1573640. eCollection 2025.
2
"The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty". A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial.“肌内注射右美托咪定与口服加巴喷丁术前用药对隆鼻术后苏醒期躁动的影响”。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02914-5.
3
Electroencephalographic insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of emergence delirium in children and corresponding clinical treatment strategies.
脑电图对儿童苏醒期谵妄病理生理机制的见解及相应临床治疗策略
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1349105. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1349105. eCollection 2024.
4
Remifentanil is Superior to Propofol for Treating Emergence Agitation in Adults After General Anesthesia.瑞芬太尼在全麻后治疗成人苏醒期躁动优于丙泊酚。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Feb 7;18:341-350. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S433155. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of the Effect of Ketamine, Ketamine-Midazolam and Ketamine-Propofol on Post-Tonsillectomy Agitation in Children.氯胺酮、氯胺酮-咪达唑仑和氯胺酮-丙泊酚对儿童扁桃体切除术后躁动影响的比较。
Malays J Med Sci. 2021 Oct;28(5):72-81. doi: 10.21315/mjms2021.28.5.7. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
6
The effect of two different doses of dexmedetomidine to prevent emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial.两种不同剂量右美托咪定预防腺样体扁桃体切除术患儿苏醒期躁动的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;72(1):63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
7
Effect of different administration and dosage of dexmedetomidine in the reduction of emergence agitation in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with sequential trial analysis.右美托咪定不同给药方式及剂量对减少儿童苏醒期躁动的影响:一项采用序贯试验分析的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Apr;10(4):929-957. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-105.
8
Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Emergence Agitation and Recovery Quality Among Children Undergoing Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.右美托咪定对全身麻醉下接受手术儿童苏醒期躁动及恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Front Pediatr. 2020 Nov 13;8:580226. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.580226. eCollection 2020.