Gantz Liat, Millodot Michel, Roth Gary Lewis
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.
School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2020 Mar 20;12:49-56. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S197783. eCollection 2020.
To detect alphabet patterns in a group of patients without strabismus and to determine whether they induced any convergence insufficiency type symptoms.
Data on subjective refraction, distance and near heterophoria, distance and near positive fusional vergence (BO), near point of convergence (NPC), measurements of upgaze and downgaze made 45° above and below the primary position with alternate cover test and a prism bar at a distance of 37.5 cm, were collected from participants of two clinics. Symptoms were assessed using the 15-item Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms Survey (CISS) to determine a symptom score. Association between alphabet patterns and the other variables was analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests.
Out of 122 patients, 14 were found to present an alphabet pattern. Defining a V pattern exophoria ≥15-prism dioptre or ≥10-prism dioptre deviation, three patients (2.5%) and 12 patients (9.8%) were identified, respectively. In addition, one case resembled an X pattern and another a diamond pattern. The refraction, distance and near heterophoria, positive fusional vergence and CISS scores were not significantly different in the participants with V pattern compared to those without V pattern.
Alphabet patterns, especially V type, were demonstrated in approximately 11.5% of a sample of 122 non-strabismus patients. These alphabet patterns were found not to be associated with convergence insufficiency-like symptoms.
检测一组无斜视患者中的字母模式,并确定它们是否引发任何集合不足型症状。
从两家诊所的参与者中收集主观验光、远近距离隐斜视、远近距离正融合性聚散(向外集合)、集合近点(NPC)的数据,以及在原在位上方和下方45°用交替遮盖试验和距离为37.5 cm的三棱镜杆进行上视和下视测量的数据。使用15项集合不足症状调查问卷(CISS)评估症状以确定症状评分。使用参数检验和非参数检验分析字母模式与其他变量之间的关联。
在122例患者中,发现14例呈现字母模式。定义外斜V征≥15棱镜度或偏差≥10棱镜度,分别识别出3例患者(2.5%)和12例患者(9.8%)。此外,1例类似X模式,另1例类似菱形模式。与无V模式的参与者相比,有V模式的参与者在验光、远近距离隐斜视、正融合性聚散和CISS评分方面无显著差异。
在122例非斜视患者样本中,约11.5%表现出字母模式,尤其是V型。这些字母模式与集合不足样症状无关。