• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度马哈拉施特拉邦人类活动区域内,豹对牲畜损失和人类受伤情况的影响。

The impact of leopards () on livestock losses and human injuries in a human-use landscape in Maharashtra, India.

作者信息

Athreya Vidya, Isvaran Kavita, Odden Morten, Linnell John D C, Kshettry Aritra, Krishnaswamy Jagdish, Karanth Ullas K

机构信息

Wildlife Conservation Society-India, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2020 Mar 26;8:e8405. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8405. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.8405
PMID:32257629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7103201/
Abstract

There are many ways in which large carnivores and humans interact in shared spaces. In this study we provide insights into human-leopard relationships in an entirely modified, human-dominated landscape inhabited by dense populations of humans (266 per km), their livestock (162 per km) and relatively high densities of large predators (10 per 100 km). No human deaths were recorded, and livestock losses to leopards numbered only 0.45 per kmper year (averaged over three years) despite the almost complete dependency of leopards on domestic animals as prey. Predation was not the major cause of livestock mortality as diseases and natural causes caused higher losses (80% of self-reported losses). We also found that ineffective night time livestock protection and the presence of domestic dogs increased the probability of a farmer facing leopard attacks on livestock. Resident farmers faced much lower livestock losses to leopard predation in contrast to the migratory shepherds who reported much higher losses, but rarely availed of the government compensation schemes. We recommend that local wildlife managers continue to shift from reactive measures such as leopard captures after livestock attacks to proactive measures such as focusing on effective livestock protection and informing the affected communities about safety measures to be taken where leopards occur in rural landscapes. The natural causes of livestock deaths due do diseases may be better prevented by involving animal husbandry department for timely vaccinations and treatment.

摘要

大型食肉动物与人类在共享空间中有多种互动方式。在本研究中,我们深入探讨了在一个完全被改造、以人类为主导的景观中,人类与豹的关系。该景观中居住着密集的人口(每平方公里266人)、他们的牲畜(每平方公里162头)以及相对较高密度的大型食肉动物(每100平方公里10只)。没有记录到人类死亡,尽管豹几乎完全依赖家畜作为猎物,但豹对家畜的捕杀损失仅为每年每平方公里0.45头(三年平均)。捕食并非家畜死亡的主要原因,因为疾病和自然原因造成的损失更高(自我报告损失的80%)。我们还发现,夜间家畜保护措施不力以及家犬的存在增加了农民面临豹袭击家畜的可能性。与迁徙牧民相比,当地农民因豹捕食造成的家畜损失要低得多,迁徙牧民报告的损失要高得多,但很少利用政府的补偿计划。我们建议,当地野生动物管理人员应继续从家畜被袭击后捕捉豹等被动措施,转向主动措施,如专注于有效的家畜保护,并告知受影响社区在农村景观中有豹出没的地方应采取的安全措施。通过让畜牧部门及时进行疫苗接种和治疗,可能更好地预防因疾病导致家畜死亡的自然原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eba/7103201/965713022a76/peerj-08-8405-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eba/7103201/a2ba788e6546/peerj-08-8405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eba/7103201/606fbabadc78/peerj-08-8405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eba/7103201/965713022a76/peerj-08-8405-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eba/7103201/a2ba788e6546/peerj-08-8405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eba/7103201/606fbabadc78/peerj-08-8405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eba/7103201/965713022a76/peerj-08-8405-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of leopards () on livestock losses and human injuries in a human-use landscape in Maharashtra, India.印度马哈拉施特拉邦人类活动区域内,豹对牲畜损失和人类受伤情况的影响。
PeerJ. 2020 Mar 26;8:e8405. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8405. eCollection 2020.
2
Translocation as a tool for mitigating conflict with leopards in human-dominated landscapes of India.通过转移(栖息地)来减少印度人类主导景观中与豹的冲突。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01599.x. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
3
Spotted in the News: Using Media Reports to Examine Leopard Distribution, Depredation, and Management Practices outside Protected Areas in Southern India.新闻热点:利用媒体报道调查印度南部保护区外花豹的分布、捕食情况及管理措施
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0142647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142647. eCollection 2015.
4
Effects of shepherds and dogs on livestock depredation by leopards () in north-eastern Iran.牧羊犬对伊朗东北部豹( )造成的牲畜掠夺的影响
PeerJ. 2017 Feb 23;5:e3049. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3049. eCollection 2017.
5
Spatial variation in leopard (Panthera pardus) site use across a gradient of anthropogenic pressure in Tanzania's Ruaha landscape.坦桑尼亚鲁阿哈景观中豹(Panthera pardus)栖息地利用的空间变化与人为压力梯度的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204370. eCollection 2018.
6
Free-ranging livestock altered the spatiotemporal behavior of the endangered North Chinese leopard (Panthera pardus japonensis) and its prey and intensified human-leopard conflicts.散养牲畜改变了濒危物种华北豹(Panthera pardus japonensis)及其猎物的时空行为,并加剧了人豹冲突。
Integr Zool. 2023 Jan;18(1):143-156. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12635. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
7
Every hill has its leopard: patterns of space use by leopards () in a mixed use landscape in India.每座山都有其豹踪:印度混合利用景观中豹()的空间利用模式
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 8;8:e10072. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10072. eCollection 2020.
8
Leopard and spotted hyena densities in the Lake Mburo National Park, southwestern Uganda.乌干达西南部姆布罗国家公园的豹和斑点鬣狗密度。
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 27;10:e12307. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12307. eCollection 2022.
9
Effectiveness of non-lethal predator deterrents to reduce livestock losses to leopard attacks within a multiple-use landscape of the Himalayan region.在喜马拉雅地区的多用途景观中,非致命性捕食者威慑措施对减少豹袭击造成的牲畜损失的有效性。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 24;8:e9544. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9544. eCollection 2020.
10
Leopard in a tea-cup: A study of leopard habitat-use and human-leopard interactions in north-eastern India.茶杯里的豹:印度东北部豹栖息地利用及人豹互动研究
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177013. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Feeding Habits of Leopards and Leopard Cats in the Fragmented Forests Surrounding the Kathmandu Valley.加德满都谷地周边碎片化森林中豹和豹猫的食性
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jan 29;15(2):e70927. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70927. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of wild prey availability on livestock predation by snow leopards.野生猎物可获得性对雪豹捕食家畜的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jun 7;4(6):170026. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170026. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Leopard in a tea-cup: A study of leopard habitat-use and human-leopard interactions in north-eastern India.茶杯里的豹:印度东北部豹栖息地利用及人豹互动研究
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177013. eCollection 2017.
3
Co-Adaptation Is Key to Coexisting with Large Carnivores.共同适应是与大型食肉动物共存的关键。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug;31(8):575-578. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
4
Adaptable neighbours: movement patterns of GPS-collared leopards in human dominated landscapes in India.适应性强的邻居:印度人类主导景观中佩戴GPS项圈的豹的活动模式
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112044. eCollection 2014.
5
Ecology. Tolerance for predatory wildlife.生态学。对食肉野生动物的耐受性。
Science. 2014 May 2;344(6183):476-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1252690.
6
Efficacy of two lion conservation programs in Maasailand, Kenya.肯尼亚马赛地区两个狮子保护项目的成效。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Jun;28(3):851-60. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12244. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
7
Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.世界上最大的食肉动物的现状和生态影响。
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):1241484. doi: 10.1126/science.1241484.
8
Understanding the role of representations of human-leopard conflict in Mumbai through media-content analysis.通过媒体内容分析理解孟买人与豹冲突的表现形式所扮演的角色。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Jun;27(3):588-94. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12037. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Big cats in our backyards: persistence of large carnivores in a human dominated landscape in India.后院里的大型猫科动物:印度人类主导景观中大型食肉动物的持续存在。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057872. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Living with lions: the economics of coexistence in the Gir forests, India.与狮子共存:印度吉尔森林的共存经济学。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e49457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049457. Epub 2013 Jan 16.