Suppr超能文献

改良两点固定法在颧上颌复合体骨折中的疗效

Efficacy of Altered Two-Point Fixation in Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture.

作者信息

Kim Jun Hyeok, Kim Ye Sol, Oh Deuk Young, Jun Young Joon, Rhie Jong Won, Moon Suk-Ho

机构信息

Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 18;2020:8537345. doi: 10.1155/2020/8537345. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To reconstruct a zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture, zygomaticofrontal (ZF) suture is the most reliable site to assess anatomical alignment and to secure rigidity. It has been chosen primary site to be fixed, but approach through the lateral eyebrow incision may leave a visible scar. This study suggests altered two-point fixation of ZMC fracture without accessing the ZF suture.

METHODS

In the retrospective study, a total of 40 patients with ZMC fracture were divided into two groups (group 1, two-point fixation and group 2, three-point fixation). Patient demographics and follow-up were evaluated, and degree of reduction including cortical gaps of ZF and inferior orbital (IO) area, protruding difference of zygoma, and malar difference using asymmetry index were measured through preoperative and postoperative CT.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the means of ZF displacement, IO displacement, protruding difference of zygoma, and facial asymmetry index between the groups were not statistically different. The result was the same after the operation. However, all variables were significantly different before and after surgery within each group. Moreover, mean operation time was significantly different between groups ( value = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Altered two-point fixation in ZMC fracture excluding incision approaching the ZF provides surgical efficacy and similar surgical outcomes to three-point fixation but offers reduced operation time and fewer complications.

摘要

目的

为重建颧上颌复合体(ZMC)骨折,颧额(ZF)缝是评估解剖复位及确保固定稳定性的最可靠部位。它一直被选为主要固定部位,但经外侧眉弓切口入路可能会留下明显瘢痕。本研究提出一种不通过ZF缝的改良两点固定ZMC骨折的方法。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,40例ZMC骨折患者被分为两组(第1组,两点固定;第2组,三点固定)。评估患者的人口统计学数据及随访情况,并通过术前和术后CT测量复位程度,包括ZF和眶下(IO)区域的皮质间隙、颧骨突出差异以及使用不对称指数测量的颧骨差异。

结果

术前,两组之间的ZF移位、IO移位、颧骨突出差异及面部不对称指数的均值无统计学差异。术后结果相同。然而,每组手术前后所有变量均有显著差异。此外,两组之间的平均手术时间有显著差异(值 = 0.026)。

结论

改良两点固定ZMC骨折(不包括经ZF缝的切口)与三点固定相比,具有相同的手术疗效和相似的手术结果,但手术时间更短,并发症更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0819/7103990/11aa3e5e86ca/BMRI2020-8537345.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验