Singh Payak Abhishek, Bhadouria Preeti, Singh Alisha, Nair Gopakumar, Randhawa Rajbir Kaur, Thakur Sachin, Singh Makkad Ramanpal
Department of Dentistry, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, MPCD and RC, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Bioinformation. 2023 Jan 31;19(1):120-125. doi: 10.6026/97320630019120. eCollection 2023.
Zygomatic bone fractures should be effectively diagnosed and treated because they affect how the face is shaped for both aesthetically and functional reasons. It is possible to compare different surgical techniques and their comorbidities objectively through using outcome quantitative assessments, which call for a treatment programme and long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of two procedures and the effectiveness of the zygomatic bone following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) employing two-point fixation and ORIF employing three-point fixation. Two groups of twenty patients each were randomly assigned to. Twenty patients in Group A had ORIF treatment using two-point miniplate fixation technique, and twenty patients in Group B received three-point miniplate fixation treatment. Differences between the two categories were ascertained after they had been evaluated in terms of their advantages and disadvantages. We discovered that the two-point fixation group had the fewest facial complications and neurological side effects. At 1 month follow up, Group B's average radiological evaluation score was 2.47± 0.30, and then at 6 months follow up, it was found out to be 1.87±0.47. A significant statistical distinction between the average radiological evaluations was observed in study participants of Group A at follow up done after one month and six months of procedure. Student's paired t- statistical test was utilized from this statistical analysis. (t = 6.54, P < 0.01). On carrying out follow up after one month of surgery, average neurological assessment score in study participants of group A was found out to be 0.22± 0.42, and then at 6 months follow up, it was 0.61±0.63. The average neurological evaluation score in study participants of Group A on carrying out follow up after one month of surgical procedure and and after six months of surgical procedure months showed a significant statistical distinction when utilizing Student's paired t- statistical test (t = 2.51, P = 0.021).It was determined that the best available rehabilitation for the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures is open reduction and internal fixation employing two-point fixation by miniplates.
颧骨骨折应得到有效诊断和治疗,因为无论从美学还是功能角度来看,它们都会影响面部形态。通过使用结果定量评估,可以客观地比较不同的手术技术及其合并症,这需要一个治疗方案和长期随访。本研究的目的是比较两种手术方法的结果以及采用两点固定的切开复位内固定术(ORIF)和采用三点固定的ORIF术后颧骨的有效性。将两组各20名患者随机分组。A组的20名患者采用两点微型钢板固定技术进行ORIF治疗,B组的20名患者接受三点微型钢板固定治疗。在对两类患者的优缺点进行评估后,确定了两者之间的差异。我们发现两点固定组的面部并发症和神经副作用最少。在1个月的随访中,B组的平均放射学评估评分为2.47±0.30,然后在6个月的随访中,发现为1.87±0.47。在手术1个月和6个月后的随访中,A组研究参与者的平均放射学评估存在显著统计学差异。该统计分析采用了学生配对t检验。(t = 6.54,P < 0.01)。在手术后1个月进行随访时,A组研究参与者的平均神经学评估评分为0.22±0.42,然后在6个月的随访中为0.61±0.63。当采用学生配对t检验时,A组研究参与者在手术1个月和6个月后的平均神经学评估评分显示出显著统计学差异(t = 2.51,P = 0.021)。已确定治疗颧上颌复合体骨折的最佳康复方法是采用微型钢板两点固定的切开复位内固定术。