Suppr超能文献

简单的心电图测量可改善冠心病患者心律失常性猝死的预测。

Simple electrocardiographic measures improve sudden arrhythmic death prediction in coronary disease.

作者信息

Chatterjee Neal A, Tikkanen Jani T, Panicker Gopi K, Narula Dhiraj, Lee Daniel C, Kentta Tuomas, Junttila Juhani M, Cook Nancy R, Kadish Alan, Goldberger Jeffrey J, Huikuri Heikki V, Albert Christine M

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 1;41(21):1988-1999. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa177.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine whether the combination of standard electrocardiographic (ECG) markers reflecting domains of arrhythmic risk improves sudden and/or arrhythmic death (SAD) risk stratification in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The association between ECG markers and SAD was examined in a derivation cohort (PREDETERMINE; N = 5462) with adjustment for clinical risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and competing risk. Competing outcome models assessed the differential association of ECG markers with SAD and competing mortality. The predictive value of a derived ECG score was then validated (ARTEMIS; N = 1900). In the derivation cohort, the 5-year cumulative incidence of SAD was 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.9] and 6.2% (95% CI 4.5-8.3) in those with a low- and high-risk ECG score, respectively (P for Δ < 0.001). A high-risk ECG score was more strongly associated with SAD than non-SAD mortality (adjusted hazard ratios = 2.87 vs. 1.38 respectively; P for Δ = 0.003) and the proportion of deaths due to SAD was greater in the high vs. low risk groups (24.9% vs. 16.5%, P for Δ = 0.03). Similar findings were observed in the validation cohort. The addition of ECG markers to a clinical risk factor model inclusive of LVEF improved indices of discrimination and reclassification in both derivation and validation cohorts, including correct reclassification of 28% of patients in the validation cohort [net reclassification improvement 28 (7-49%), P = 0.009].

CONCLUSION

For patients with CHD, an externally validated ECG score enriched for both absolute and proportional SAD risk and significantly improved risk stratification compared to standard clinical risk factors including LVEF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114269. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01114269.

摘要

目的

确定反映心律失常风险领域的标准心电图(ECG)标志物组合是否能改善冠心病(CHD)患者的猝死和/或心律失常性死亡(SAD)风险分层。

方法与结果

在一个推导队列(PREDETERMINE;N = 5462)中研究了ECG标志物与SAD之间的关联,并对临床风险因素、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和竞争风险进行了调整。竞争结局模型评估了ECG标志物与SAD及竞争死亡率之间的差异关联。然后对推导得到的ECG评分的预测价值进行了验证(ARTEMIS;N = 1900)。在推导队列中,低风险和高风险ECG评分患者的SAD 5年累积发生率分别为1.5%[95%置信区间(CI)1.1 - 1.9]和6.2%(95%CI 4.5 - 8.3)(ΔP < 0.001)。高风险ECG评分与SAD的关联比与非SAD死亡率的关联更强(调整后的风险比分别为2.87和1.38;ΔP = 0.003),高风险组因SAD导致的死亡比例高于低风险组(24.9%对16.5%,ΔP = 0.03)。在验证队列中也观察到了类似的结果。将ECG标志物添加到包含LVEF的临床风险因素模型中,在推导队列和验证队列中均改善了鉴别和重新分类指标,包括在验证队列中对28%的患者进行了正确的重新分类[净重新分类改善28(7 - 49%),P = 0.009]。

结论

对于CHD患者,与包括LVEF在内的标准临床风险因素相比,经外部验证的ECG评分丰富了SAD的绝对风险和比例风险,并显著改善了风险分层。

临床试验注册

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114269。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT01114269。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/266a/7263700/e5790525ae8a/ehaa177f6.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验