• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舒张期血压可预测主动脉瓣周漏封闭术后的结局。

Diastolic blood pressure predicts outcomes after aortic paravalvular leak closure.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 1;97(1):E79-E87. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28890. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.28890
PMID:32259389
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine hemodynamic effects of aortic paravalvular leak (PVL) and predictors of clinical outcomes after aortic PVL closure.

BACKGROUND

The significance of hemodynamic alterations in PVL and relation to severity, procedural success of percutaneous closure and clinical outcomes have not been defined.

METHODS

Patients undergoing percutaneous PVL closure between July 21, 2004 and September 10, 2018 were included. PVL severity was assessed by echocardiography and aortic angiography. Hemodynamics were assessed by intra-arterial pressure tracings before and after PVL closure. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality, redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) and redo PVL closure.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen patients (mean age 70.3 ± 14.9 years, 79% surgical and 21% transcatheter prostheses) underwent PVL closure with 94% technical success. PVL was moderate or greater in 106 (91%) at baseline and 11 (11%) post-procedure. Diastolic BP for those with moderate or greater PVL was lower than for those with less PVL (50.3 ± 11.7 vs. 56.5 ± 12.4 mmHg, p < .001). Pulse pressure was similar between these groups (69.9 ± 20.3 vs. 67.4 ± 21.2 mmHg, p = .39). 35 patients (34%) had 40 events during a mean follow-up of 1.6 ± 1.9 years (23 deaths, 12 redo AVR, and five redo PVL closures). In a multivariate model, final diastolic BP <47 mmHg (HR 3.27 [1.45-7.36], p = .007) was a significant predictor of the composite endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Diastolic BP was significantly associated with aortic PVL severity and clinical outcomes after PVL closure. In contrast, pulse pressure did not correlate with PVL severity or outcomes. These findings have implications for clinical management of patients with aortic PVL.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定主动脉瓣周漏(PVL)的血液动力学影响以及主动脉瓣周漏闭合后临床结局的预测因素。

背景

PVL 中的血液动力学改变及其与严重程度、经皮闭合术的成功率和临床结局的关系尚未确定。

方法

纳入 2004 年 7 月 21 日至 2018 年 9 月 10 日期间接受经皮 PVL 闭合术的患者。通过超声心动图和主动脉造影评估 PVL 严重程度。通过 PVL 闭合前后的动脉压力轨迹评估血液动力学。主要结局是死亡率、再次主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)和再次 PVL 闭合的复合结局。

结果

117 例患者(平均年龄 70.3±14.9 岁,79%为外科手术,21%为经导管假体)接受了 PVL 闭合术,技术成功率为 94%。基线时有 106 例(91%)患者的 PVL 为中度或更严重,11 例(11%)患者在术后为中度或更严重。中度或更严重 PVL 的患者舒张压低于 PVL 较轻的患者(50.3±11.7 与 56.5±12.4mmHg,p<0.001)。两组间脉压相似(69.9±20.3 与 67.4±21.2mmHg,p=0.39)。在平均 1.6±1.9 年的随访期间,35 例患者(34%)发生 40 起事件(23 例死亡,12 例再次 AVR,5 例再次 PVL 闭合)。在多变量模型中,终末期舒张压<47mmHg(HR 3.27[1.45-7.36],p=0.007)是复合终点的显著预测因素。

结论

舒张压与主动脉瓣周漏的严重程度及 PVL 闭合后临床结局显著相关。相比之下,脉压与 PVL 严重程度或结局无关。这些发现对主动脉瓣周漏患者的临床管理具有意义。

相似文献

1
Diastolic blood pressure predicts outcomes after aortic paravalvular leak closure.舒张期血压可预测主动脉瓣周漏封闭术后的结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 1;97(1):E79-E87. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28890. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
2
Characteristics and outcomes of re-do percutaneous paravalvular leak closure.再次经皮瓣周漏封堵术的特点及结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):680-689. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26961. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
Techniques and outcomes of paravalvular leak repair after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣周漏修补的技术与结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 1;90(5):870-877. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27224. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Hemodynamic classification of paravalvular leakage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with angiographic or echocardiographic classification for prediction of 1-year mortality.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后瓣周漏的血流动力学分类与血管造影或超声心动图分类对1年死亡率预测的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 1;91(6):E56-E63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27384. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
5
A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.在失败的无支架与有支架外科生物人工主动脉瓣中进行瓣中瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 1;93(6):1106-1115. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28039. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Impact of CoreValve size selection based on multi-slice computed tomography on paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.基于多层计算机断层扫描的CoreValve尺寸选择对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后瓣周漏的影响。
Cardiol J. 2017;24(5):467-476. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0014. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Quantitative Prediction of Paravalvular Leak in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Based on Tissue-Mimicking 3D Printing.基于组织模拟 3D 打印的经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣周漏的定量预测。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jul;10(7):719-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.005.
8
Paravalvular leak closure under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance.心内超声心动图引导下瓣周漏封堵术
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 1;91(5):958-965. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27318. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Importance of Contrast Aortography With Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Post Hoc Analysis From the RESPOND Post-Market Study.重要性的对比主动脉造影与莲花经导管主动脉瓣置换术:从 RESPOND 上市后研究的事后分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.016.
10
Successful treatment of a paravalvular leak with balloon cracking and valve-in-valve TAVR.球囊破裂联合经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗瓣周漏。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 1;95(4):859-862. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28644. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Renal function changes associated with transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve for prosthetic regurgitation compared to stenosis.与经导管主动脉瓣中瓣治疗人工瓣膜反流相比,经导管主动脉瓣中瓣治疗人工瓣膜狭窄时的肾功能变化。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Mar 14;39:100999. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100999. eCollection 2022 Apr.