• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快走——院外心脏骤停时非专业急救人员的实际行进速度。

A brisk walk-Real-life travelling speed of lay responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

作者信息

Jonsson Martin, Berglund Ellinor, Djärv Therese, Nordberg Per, Claesson Andreas, Forsberg Sune, Nord Anette, Tan Hanno L, Ringh Mattias

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2020 Jun;151:197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.043. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.043
PMID:32259606
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Defibrillation by public Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) before EMS arrival is associated with high survival rates. Previous recommendSations suggest that an AED should be placed within a 1-1.5 min "brisk walk" from a cardiac arrest. Current guidelines hold no recommendation. The real-time it takes for a volunteer to retrieve an AED in a public setting has not been studied.

METHODS

Global Positioning System data and Geographical Information Systems methods were used to track the movement of mobile phone dispatched lay responders in two large Swedish areas. The distance and the travelling time were calculated from when the lay responder received the call, until they were within 25 m from the coordinate of the suspected OHCA sent by the dispatch centre.

RESULTS

During 7 months, a total of 2176 persons were included in the final analysis. The median travelling speed was 2.3 (IQR = 1.4-4.0) metres per second (m/s) among all cases with a response time of 6.2 min. The corresponding travelling distance was 956 m (IQR = 480-1661). In the most densely populated areas (>8000 inhabitants/km) the response time was 1.8 m/s compared to 3.1 in the least densely populated areas (0-1500 inhabitants/km).

CONCLUSION

The median travelling speed of all lay responders dispatched to suspected OHCAs was 2.3 m/s. In densely populated areas the travelling speed was 1.8 m/s. This can be used as support in guidelines for planning placement of AEDs, in simulation studies, as well as in configuration of mobile-based dispatch systems.

摘要

背景

在急救医疗服务(EMS)到达之前,由公共自动体外除颤器(AED)进行除颤与高生存率相关。先前的建议表明,AED应放置在距离心脏骤停地点1至1.5分钟“轻快步行”的范围内。当前指南未给出相关建议。在公共环境中志愿者取回AED所需的实际时间尚未得到研究。

方法

使用全球定位系统数据和地理信息系统方法,追踪瑞典两个大区域中通过手机调度的非专业急救人员的行动。计算从非专业急救人员接到呼叫起,到他们距离调度中心发送的疑似院外心脏骤停(OHCA)坐标25米范围内的距离和行进时间。

结果

在7个月期间,最终分析共纳入2176人。所有病例的中位行进速度为每秒2.3米(四分位间距[IQR]=1.4 - 4.0),响应时间为6.2分钟。相应的行进距离为956米(IQR = 480 - 1661)。在人口最密集地区(>8000居民/平方公里),响应时间为每秒1.8米,而在人口最不密集地区(0 - 1500居民/平方公里)为每秒3.1米。

结论

被派往疑似院外心脏骤停现场的所有非专业急救人员的中位行进速度为每秒2.3米。在人口密集地区,行进速度为每秒1.8米。这可用于支持AED放置规划指南、模拟研究以及基于移动设备的调度系统配置。

相似文献

1
A brisk walk-Real-life travelling speed of lay responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.快走——院外心脏骤停时非专业急救人员的实际行进速度。
Resuscitation. 2020 Jun;151:197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.043. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
2
Local lay rescuers with AEDs, alerted by text messages, contribute to early defibrillation in a Dutch out-of-hospital cardiac arrest dispatch system.在荷兰的院外心脏骤停调度系统中,通过短信提醒配备自动体外除颤器(AED)的当地非专业救援人员有助于早期除颤。
Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85(11):1444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
3
A smartphone application for dispatch of lay responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.一款用于派遣非专业急救人员对院外心脏骤停进行急救的智能手机应用。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.039. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Alert system-supported lay defibrillation and basic life-support for cardiac arrest at home.报警系统支持的非专业人员除颤和基本生命支持用于家庭心搏骤停。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Apr 14;43(15):1465-1474. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab802.
5
Effect of Smartphone Dispatch of Volunteer Responders on Automated External Defibrillators and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: The SAMBA Randomized Clinical Trial.志愿者响应者智能手机调度对自动体外除颤器和院外心脏骤停的影响:SAMBA 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jan 1;8(1):81-88. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4362.
6
Real-life time and distance covered by lay first responders alerted by means of smartphone-application: Implications for early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and access to automatic external defibrillators.智能手机应用报警后,非专业急救者实际花费的时间和距离:对早期开始心肺复苏和使用自动体外除颤器的影响。
Resuscitation. 2019 Aug;141:182-187. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 May 26.
7
Defibrillation before EMS arrival in western Sweden.瑞典西部急救医疗服务(EMS)到达前的除颤情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1043-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.030. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
8
AED and text message responders density in residential areas for rapid response in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.用于院外心脏骤停快速响应的居民区自动体外除颤器(AED)和短信响应者密度
Resuscitation. 2020 May;150:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
9
Longer retrieval distances to the automated external defibrillator reduces survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.距离自动体外除颤器更远的检索距离会降低院外心脏骤停后的生存率。
Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
Association of Bystander and First-Responder Intervention With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in North Carolina, 2010-2013.北卡罗来纳州 2010-2013 年院外心脏骤停后旁观者和急救者干预与生存的相关性。
JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):255-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7938.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing placement of public-access naloxone kits using geospatial analytics: a modelling study.利用地理空间分析优化公共获取纳洛酮试剂盒的放置:一项建模研究
CMAJ. 2025 Mar 16;197(10):E258-E265. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241228.
2
Automatic external defibrillator (AED) location - seconds that save lifes.自动体外除颤器(AED)位置——挽救生命的秒数。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Sep 12;82(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01395-1.
3
Strategic placement of volunteer responder system defibrillators.志愿者应急响应系统除颤器的战略布局。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Dec;27(4):503-524. doi: 10.1007/s10729-024-09685-4. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
4
Effect of Smartphone Dispatch of Volunteer Responders on Automated External Defibrillators and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: The SAMBA Randomized Clinical Trial.志愿者响应者智能手机调度对自动体外除颤器和院外心脏骤停的影响:SAMBA 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jan 1;8(1):81-88. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4362.
5
Urban-Rural Differences in Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study.心脏骤停结局的城乡差异:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
CJC Open. 2021 Dec 30;4(4):383-389. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.12.010. eCollection 2022 Apr.