School of Medicine.
Division of Hematology Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):428-433. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7375.
As progress continues in oncology drug development, this study aimed to examine whether the previously established association between drug dose and efficacy in the era of cytotoxic therapies remains true in today's phase I dose-escalation oncology trials.
A systematic review of early-phase dose-finding trials of single-agent oncology drugs from 2015 to 2018 was conducted to examine the relationship between drug dose and objective responses. Cancer-specific trials were included if they determined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Data related to the study drug, study design, treatment response, cancer type, dose levels, MTD, and RP2D were all collected. Dose level was categorized into 4 categories (≤40%, 41%-80%, 81%-120%, and >120% of the RP2D) and was further analyzed by class of drug.
A total of 175 phase I studies were identified, with a total of 7,330 patients showing a median response rate of 5% (range, 0%-83%) across trials. A total of 93 trials with 2,506 participants had response data corresponding to drug dose level. In this subset, the median response rate was 5% (range, 0%-83%) across trials. Across all participants in this subset, the response rate was 12% (57 of 491) among those in the dose range of ≤40% of RP2D, 17% (95 of 562) among those in 41% to 80% of RP2D, 23% (272 of 1,206) among those in 81% to 120% of RP2D, and 29% (71 of 247) among those in >120% of RP2D (P<.001). The response rate at ≤40% of RP2D for targeted antibody was 5%, 4% for cellular therapy, 19% for immunotherapy, and 21% for small-molecule targeted inhibitors.
Whereas our study of published phase I trials continued to show a low response rate consistent with earlier studies, the relationship between response and dose does not always peak at 81% to 120% of RP2D anymore, likely due to the use of novel immunotherapy and targeted agents with distinct efficacy and toxicity patterns.
随着肿瘤药物开发的进展,本研究旨在探讨在当今的 I 期剂量递增肿瘤试验中,细胞毒治疗时代确立的药物剂量与疗效之间的关联是否仍然成立。
对 2015 年至 2018 年的单药肿瘤药物早期 I 期剂量发现试验进行了系统评价,以检查药物剂量与客观反应之间的关系。如果确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)和/或推荐的 II 期剂量(RP2D),则纳入特定于癌症的试验。收集与研究药物、研究设计、治疗反应、癌症类型、剂量水平、MTD 和 RP2D 相关的数据。剂量水平分为 4 类(≤40%、41%-80%、81%-120%和>120%的 RP2D),并按药物类别进一步分析。
共确定了 175 项 I 期研究,共有 7330 例患者在试验中显示出 5%的中位反应率(范围为 0%-83%)。共有 93 项试验和 2506 名参与者有与药物剂量水平相对应的反应数据。在这个亚组中,试验中的中位反应率为 5%(范围为 0%-83%)。在该亚组的所有参与者中,RP2D 剂量范围≤40%的患者的反应率为 12%(57/491),41%-80%的患者为 17%(95/562),81%-120%的患者为 23%(272/1206),>120%的患者为 29%(71/247)(P<.001)。靶向抗体的 RP2D 剂量≤40%的反应率为 5%,细胞治疗为 4%,免疫治疗为 19%,小分子靶向抑制剂为 21%。
尽管我们对已发表的 I 期试验的研究继续显示出与早期研究一致的低反应率,但反应与剂量之间的关系不再总是在 RP2D 的 81%至 120%之间达到峰值,这可能是由于新型免疫疗法和靶向药物的使用,这些药物具有不同的疗效和毒性模式。