• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I 期肿瘤学研究:有证据表明,在靶向治疗时代,接受较低剂量治疗的患者并未表现出更差的结果。

Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.

机构信息

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Phase I Program, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1289-97. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2684. Epub 2010 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2684
PMID:20145187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2822881/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To safely assess new drugs, cancer patients in initial cohorts of phase I oncology studies receive low drug doses. Doses are successively increased until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is determined. Because traditional chemotherapy is often more effective near the MTD, ethical concerns have been raised about administration of low drug doses to phase I patients. However, a substantial portion of oncology trials now investigate targeted agents, which may have different dose-response relationships than cytotoxic chemotherapies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Twenty-four consecutive trials treating 683 patients between October 1, 2004, and June 30, 2008, at MD Anderson Cancer Center were analyzed. Patients were assigned to a low-dose (<or=25% MTD), medium-dose (25-75% MTD), or high-dose (>or=75% MTD) group, and groups were compared for response rate, time-to-treatment failure, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. To remove negatively biasing data from the high-dose group, in a second analysis, patients treated above the MTD were excluded (high-dose group, 75-100% MTD). Of the 683 patients, 97.7% received targeted agents.

RESULTS

Even when excluding patients above the MTD, there was an early trend favoring the low- versus high-dose group in time-to-treatment failure, with 32.9% versus 25.2% of patients on therapy at 3 months (P = 0.08). In addition, the low-dose group fared at least as well as the other groups in all other outcomes, including response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data may help alleviate concerns that patients who receive low drug doses on contemporary phase I oncology trials fare worse and suggest targeted agents may have different dose-response relationships than cytotoxic chemotherapies.

摘要

目的

为了安全地评估新药,在 I 期肿瘤学研究的初始队列中,癌症患者接受低剂量药物。剂量逐渐增加,直到确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)。由于传统化疗在接近 MTD 时通常更有效,因此人们对给 I 期患者给予低剂量药物提出了伦理方面的担忧。然而,现在相当一部分肿瘤学试验都在研究靶向药物,这些药物的剂量反应关系可能与细胞毒性化疗药物不同。

实验设计

对 2004 年 10 月 1 日至 2008 年 6 月 30 日期间在 MD 安德森癌症中心进行的 24 项连续试验共 683 例患者进行了分析。将患者分为低剂量(≤25% MTD)、中剂量(25%-75% MTD)或高剂量(≥75% MTD)组,并对各组的反应率、治疗失败时间、无进展生存期、总生存期和毒性进行比较。为了消除高剂量组中存在的负偏数据,在第二次分析中,排除了接受 MTD 以上剂量治疗的患者(高剂量组,75%-100% MTD)。在 683 例患者中,97.7%接受了靶向药物治疗。

结果

即使排除接受 MTD 以上剂量的患者,在治疗失败时间方面,低剂量组仍较高剂量组有早期趋势,3 个月时仍有 32.9%和 25.2%的患者接受治疗(P = 0.08)。此外,低剂量组在所有其他结局方面至少与其他组一样,包括反应率、无进展生存期、总生存期和毒性。

结论

这些数据可能有助于缓解人们的担忧,即接受当代 I 期肿瘤学试验低剂量药物的患者预后较差,并表明靶向药物的剂量反应关系可能与细胞毒性化疗药物不同。

相似文献

1
Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.I 期肿瘤学研究:有证据表明,在靶向治疗时代,接受较低剂量治疗的患者并未表现出更差的结果。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1289-97. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2684. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
2
Relationship Between Response and Dose in Published, Contemporary Phase I Oncology Trials.发表的当代肿瘤学 I 期临床试验中反应与剂量的关系。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):428-433. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7375.
3
Dose-response relationship in phase i clinical trials: a European Drug Development Network (EDDN) Collaboration Study.I 期临床试验中的剂量反应关系:欧洲药物开发网络(EDDN)合作研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Nov 15;20(22):5663-71. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0719. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
4
Phase I oncology trials incorporating patient choice of dose.纳入患者剂量选择的 I 期肿瘤学试验。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Sep 25;107(7):1022-4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.378. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
5
Meta-analysis of the relationship between dose and benefit in phase I targeted agent trials.I 期靶向药物试验中剂量与疗效关系的 Meta 分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Dec 19;104(24):1860-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs439. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
6
Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.评估肿瘤 1 期临床试验剂量递增阶段的各种连续再评估方法模型:使用真实临床数据和模拟研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07703-6.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Adaptive dose finding for phase I clinical trials of drugs used for chemotherapy of cancer.用于癌症化疗的药物的I期临床试验的适应性剂量探索
Stat Med. 2002 Jul 15;21(13):1805-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.1141.
9
Pediatric phase I trials in oncology: an analysis of study conduct efficiency.肿瘤学中的儿科I期试验:研究实施效率分析
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8431-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1568.
10
Predictors for establishing recommended phase 2 doses: analysis of 320 dose-seeking oncology phase 1 trials.预测建立推荐的 2 期剂量的指标:320 项探索性肿瘤学 1 期试验的分析。
Invest New Drugs. 2012 Apr;30(2):653-61. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9574-4. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the Dosing Schedules of Targeted Anticancer Agents.改善靶向抗癌药物的给药方案。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 6;18(6):848. doi: 10.3390/ph18060848.
2
Novel clinical trial designs emerging from the molecular reclassification of cancer.源于癌症分子重新分类的新型临床试验设计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 May-Jun;75(3):243-267. doi: 10.3322/caac.21880. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
Advancing cancer drug development with mechanistic mathematical modeling: bridging the gap between theory and practice.运用机制数学建模推进癌症药物研发:弥合理论与实践之间的差距。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2024 Dec;51(6):581-604. doi: 10.1007/s10928-024-09930-x. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Skipping a pillar does not make for strong foundations: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic reasoning behind the shape of dose-response relationships in oncology.跳过支柱无法建立坚实的基础:肿瘤学中剂量反应关系形态背后的药代动力学-药效学推理。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 Nov;12(11):1591-1601. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13020. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
Clinical outcome assessment trends in clinical trials-Contrasting oncology and non-oncology trials.临床试验中的临床结局评估趋势-肿瘤学和非肿瘤学试验对比。
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):16945-16957. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6325. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
6
Dosing of 3 Targeted Agents in Novel Drug Combinations Used at the Precision Medicine Clinic of the University of California San Diego.加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校精准医学诊所使用的新型药物组合中3种靶向药物的给药
J Hematol Oncol Pharm. 2023 Feb;13(1):19-25.
7
Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.精准肿瘤学试验的挑战、机遇与创新统计设计
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):1038. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-356.
8
Patient-centered dosing: oncologists' perspectives about treatment-related side effects and individualized dosing for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).以患者为中心的剂量调整:肿瘤学家对转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者治疗相关副作用和个体化剂量的看法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):549-563. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06755-5. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
9
Embracing Project Optimus: Can we Leverage Evolutionary Theory to Optimize Dosing in Oncology?拥抱“优化者”项目:我们能否利用进化理论优化肿瘤学的给药剂量?
Pharm Res. 2022 Dec;39(12):3259-3265. doi: 10.1007/s11095-022-03380-1. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
10
Determining drug dose in the era of targeted therapies: playing it (un)safe?靶向治疗时代的药物剂量确定:玩的是(不)安全?
Blood Cancer J. 2022 Aug 23;12(8):123. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00720-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical benefit in Phase-I trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: does dose matter?新型分子靶向药物I期试验中的临床获益:剂量重要吗?
Br J Cancer. 2009 May 5;100(9):1373-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605030.
2
Survival of patients in a Phase 1 Clinic: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.一期临床中患者的生存情况:MD安德森癌症中心的经验。
Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1091-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24018.
3
Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the most effective.I期研究中的剂量选择:为何我们应始终选择最有效的剂量。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3650-2; author reply 3652-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.6719.
4
Survival analysis.生存分析
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;404:303-18. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_15.
5
Evolution of decitabine development: accomplishments, ongoing investigations, and future strategies.地西他滨的研发进展:成就、正在进行的研究及未来策略。
Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2341-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23463.
6
Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the top.I期研究中的剂量选择:为何我们应始终选择最高剂量。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1576-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5192. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
7
Risks and benefits associated with novel phase 1 oncology trial designs.与新型1期肿瘤学试验设计相关的风险和益处。
Cancer. 2007 Sep 1;110(5):1115-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22878.
8
Rethinking risk-benefit assessment for phase I cancer trials.重新思考癌症I期试验的风险效益评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):2987-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.9296.
9
New paradigm in dose-finding trials: patient-specific dosing and beyond phase I.剂量探索试验的新范式:个体化给药及超越I期试验
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 1;11(15):5342-6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0458.
10
Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, revisited.1期肿瘤学试验的风险与获益,再探讨。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):930-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058007.