• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负面媒体事件对公众对红肉行业动物福利态度的影响。

The Impact of a Negative Media Event on Public Attitudes Towards Animal Welfare in the Red Meat Industry.

作者信息

Rice Maxine, Hemsworth Lauren M, Hemsworth Paul H, Coleman Grahame J

机构信息

Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 3;10(4):619. doi: 10.3390/ani10040619.

DOI:10.3390/ani10040619
PMID:32260202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7222821/
Abstract

Public perception of livestock industries and consumer trust in farmers can affect consumer behaviour and impact on social license to farm. Coincidental with a large random telephone survey of Australian public attitudes and behaviour towards the red meat industry, a media campaign exposing animal cruelty in live export of sheep by sea, occurred. Data collected from the nationwide survey of the public attitudes immediately before (n = 278 respondents) and after (n = 224 respondents) this media campaign was utilised in the present study to examine the effects of the media campaign on the public. In general, respondents' attitudes towards the red meat industry were positive. Independent t-tests revealed no significant differences between those respondents that completed the survey before or after the 60 Minutes programme in their concern for sheep or beef cattle welfare, attitudes to red meat farming, acceptability of the red meat industry or their trust in farmers in the red meat industry. However, prior to the media campaign, respondents believed sheep to be more comfortable when transported by boats than did respondents who completed the survey after the media campaign. More respondents after the 60 Minutes programme cited social and internet media as a source of information. Therefore, despite the wide media coverage associated with the 60 Minutes programme, these results indicate little effect on the public's attitudes towards farm animal welfare and the red meat industry. The significant impacts of the programme were reflected in increased community discussion, increased social media activity and an increase in the perceived importance of conditions aboard boats used for live sheep transport.

摘要

公众对畜牧业的认知以及消费者对农民的信任会影响消费者行为,并对养殖的社会许可产生影响。在对澳大利亚公众对红肉行业的态度和行为进行大规模随机电话调查的同时,一场媒体运动曝光了通过海路活羊出口中的动物虐待行为。本研究利用在这场媒体运动之前(n = 278名受访者)和之后(n = 224名受访者)从全国公众态度调查中收集的数据,来检验媒体运动对公众的影响。总体而言,受访者对红肉行业的态度是积极的。独立t检验显示,在《60分钟时事杂志》节目之前或之后完成调查的受访者,在对绵羊或肉牛福利的关注、对红肉养殖的态度、红肉行业的可接受性或他们对红肉行业农民的信任方面,没有显著差异。然而,在媒体运动之前,受访者认为绵羊乘船运输时比媒体运动之后完成调查的受访者感觉更舒适。在《60分钟时事杂志》节目之后,更多受访者将社交和互联网媒体作为信息来源。因此,尽管与《60分钟时事杂志》节目相关的媒体报道广泛,但这些结果表明,该节目对公众对农场动物福利和红肉行业的态度影响不大。该节目的重大影响体现在社区讨论增加、社交媒体活动增加以及人们对用于活羊运输的船只上的条件的重要性的认知增加。

相似文献

1
The Impact of a Negative Media Event on Public Attitudes Towards Animal Welfare in the Red Meat Industry.负面媒体事件对公众对红肉行业动物福利态度的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 3;10(4):619. doi: 10.3390/ani10040619.
2
Differences in public and producer attitudes toward animal welfare in the red meat industries.红肉行业中公众与生产者对动物福利态度的差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:875221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875221. eCollection 2022.
3
Telephone Survey Versus Panel Survey Samples Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes and Behavior Regarding Animal Welfare in the Red Meat Industry in Australia.电话调查与小组调查样本:评估澳大利亚红肉行业中有关动物福利的知识、态度和行为
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 8;12:581928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581928. eCollection 2021.
4
Improving Communication in the Red Meat Industry: Opinion Leaders May Be Used to Inform the Public About Farm Practices and Their Animal Welfare Implications.改善红肉行业的沟通:意见领袖可用于向公众宣传农场养殖方式及其对动物福利的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 2;13:876034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876034. eCollection 2022.
5
Australian Public Opinions Regarding the Live Export Trade before and after an Animal Welfare Media Exposé.动物福利媒体曝光前后澳大利亚公众对活体动物出口贸易的看法。
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 29;8(7):106. doi: 10.3390/ani8070106.
6
Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability.红肉及加工肉类的消费、购买行为与态度:对人类健康、动物福利及环境可持续性的影响
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2446-56. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000567. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
"I Feel Sorry for Them": Australian Meat Consumers' Perceptions about Sheep and Beef Cattle Transportation.“我为它们感到难过”:澳大利亚肉类消费者对绵羊和肉牛运输的看法。
Animals (Basel). 2018 Oct 3;8(10):171. doi: 10.3390/ani8100171.
8
Determinants of biosecurity behaviour of British cattle and sheep farmers-a behavioural economics analysis.英国牛羊养殖户生物安全行为的决定因素——行为经济学分析。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Mar 1;108(4):321-33. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.11.009. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
9
Varying Opinions about Animal Welfare in the Australian Live Export Industry: A Survey.澳大利亚活畜出口行业中关于动物福利的不同观点:一项调查
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;10(10):1864. doi: 10.3390/ani10101864.
10
Australian Livestock Export Industry Workers' Attitudes toward Animal Welfare.澳大利亚牲畜出口行业工人对动物福利的态度。
Animals (Basel). 2021 May 14;11(5):1411. doi: 10.3390/ani11051411.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the Effectiveness of Both Cognitive and Emotional Forms of Instructional Videos Related to the Beef Industry.衡量与牛肉行业相关的认知型和情感型教学视频的有效性。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Sep 3;15(17):2584. doi: 10.3390/ani15172584.
2
Friend or foe: assessing the value of animal models for facilitating clinical breakthroughs in complement research.敌友之间:评估动物模型在推动补体研究临床突破方面的价值。
J Clin Invest. 2025 Jun 16;135(12). doi: 10.1172/JCI188347.
3
Effect of artificial insemination, ruminal incubation, and esophageal tubing on cortisol concentration in blood of lactating dairy cows.人工授精、瘤胃内培养和食管插管对泌乳奶牛血液中皮质醇浓度的影响。
JDS Commun. 2024 Nov 5;6(2):241-244. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0676. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Benchmarking Giant Panda Welfare in Tourism: A Co-Design Approach for Animals, Tourists, Managers, and Researchers.旅游中大熊猫福利的基准评估:一种针对动物、游客、管理者和研究人员的共同设计方法。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 23;14(15):2137. doi: 10.3390/ani14152137.
5
Consumers' Attitudes towards Animal Suffering: A Systematic Review on Awareness, Willingness and Dietary Change.消费者对动物苦难的态度:意识、意愿和饮食改变的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316372.
6
Differences in public and producer attitudes toward animal welfare in the red meat industries.红肉行业中公众与生产者对动物福利态度的差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:875221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875221. eCollection 2022.
7
The Effect of Weaning and Slaughter Age on the Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Beef-A PDO Portuguese Meat.断奶和屠宰年龄对葡萄牙法定产区牛肉理化及感官特性的影响
Foods. 2022 Aug 19;11(16):2505. doi: 10.3390/foods11162505.
8
Improving Communication in the Red Meat Industry: Opinion Leaders May Be Used to Inform the Public About Farm Practices and Their Animal Welfare Implications.改善红肉行业的沟通:意见领袖可用于向公众宣传农场养殖方式及其对动物福利的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 2;13:876034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876034. eCollection 2022.
9
Community Attitudes Reflect Reporting Rates and Prevalence of Animal Mistreatment.社区态度反映动物虐待的报告率和发生率。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 28;8:666727. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.666727. eCollection 2021.
10
Who has a beef with reducing red and processed meat consumption? A media framing analysis.谁对减少食用红色肉类和加工肉类有意见?一项媒体框架分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Mar;25(3):578-590. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004092. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Australian Public Opinions Regarding the Live Export Trade before and after an Animal Welfare Media Exposé.动物福利媒体曝光前后澳大利亚公众对活体动物出口贸易的看法。
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 29;8(7):106. doi: 10.3390/ani8070106.
2
Farmer and Public Attitudes Toward Lamb Finishing Systems.农民和公众对羔羊育肥系统的态度。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2016;19(2):198-209. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1127766. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
The role of cognitive styles and sociodemographic characteristics in consumer perceptions and attitudes toward nonhuman animal welfare.认知风格和社会人口学特征在消费者对非人类动物福利的认知及态度中的作用。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2014;17(3):198-215. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2014.899911. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
4
The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets.正态性假设在大型公共卫生数据集中的重要性。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:151-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546. Epub 2001 Oct 25.