• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球精神障碍患者治疗预算的有效性——基于德国13项对照研究索赔数据的荟萃分析

Effectiveness of Global Treatment Budgets for Patients With Mental Disorders-Claims Data Based Meta-Analysis of 13 Controlled Studies From Germany.

作者信息

Baum Fabian, Schoffer Olaf, Neumann Anne, Seifert Martin, Kliemt Roman, March Stefanie, Swart Enno, Häckl Dennis, Pfennig Andrea, Schmitt Jochen

机构信息

Center of Evidence-Based Health Care, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

WIG2 Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 24;11:131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00131. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00131
PMID:32265748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7105704/
Abstract

Individuals with mental disorders need continuous and efficient collaboration between different sectors of care. In 2012, a new law in Germany enabled the implementation of novel budgets in psychiatry (flexible and integrated treatment = FIT). Hospitals implementing FIT programs have been evaluated in controlled cohort studies. We present first results based on a meta-analysis from 13 FIT hospitals. We undertook a series of claims-data-based controlled cohort studies. Data from over 70 statutory health insurance (SHI) funds in Germany were analyzed. All patients insured by any of the participating SHI funds and treated in one of the FIT hospitals for any of 16 predefined mental disorders were compared with matched control patients from routine care. The patient collective was subdivided into hospital-new and hospital-known patients. Analyses included utilization of inpatient care, day care, outpatient PIA (psychiatrische Institutsambulanz) care, outpatient care with established practitioners, and durations of sick leave. Individual treatment effects of the 13 FIT hospitals were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis was used to explore potential reasons for heterogeneity in model effectiveness. The meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction by over 5 days of inpatient care in hospital-new patients in FIT hospitals compared to control hospitals. This effect was stronger among FIT hospitals with a preexisting FIT-like environment. There was no overall significant effect regarding sick leave between the two groups. Further meta-regression for hospital-new patients revealed a significantly reduced duration of sick leave by almost 13 days for patients in FIT hospitals with a preexisting FIT-like contract compared to FIT hospitals without such a contract. This study suggests positive effects of FIT programs for patients with mental disorders pointing toward a shorter duration of inpatient treatment. Furthermore, contracts already existent prior to initialization of FIT programs appear to have facilitated the transition into the new treatment environment. For FIT hospitals without such contracts, supposedly there is a certain implementation phase for effects to be apparent. The results should still be interpreted with caution as this manuscript only covers the first year of the 5 year evaluation period in 13 of 18 FIT hospitals. This study was registered in the database "Health Services Research Germany" (trial number: VVfD_EVA64_15_003713).

摘要

患有精神障碍的个体需要不同护理部门之间持续且高效的协作。2012年,德国一项新法律使得在精神病学领域实施新预算(灵活综合治疗 = FIT)成为可能。实施FIT项目的医院已在对照队列研究中得到评估。我们基于对13家FIT医院的荟萃分析给出了初步结果。我们开展了一系列基于理赔数据的对照队列研究。分析了来自德国70多家法定健康保险(SHI)基金的数据。将任何参与SHI基金承保且在13家FIT医院之一接受治疗的、患有16种预定义精神障碍中任何一种的所有患者,与来自常规护理的匹配对照患者进行比较。患者群体被细分为新入院患者和复诊患者。分析内容包括住院护理、日间护理、门诊PIA(精神病院门诊)护理、与执业医师的门诊护理的使用情况以及病假时长。对13家FIT医院的个体治疗效果进行随机效应荟萃分析汇总。采用荟萃回归分析来探究模型有效性异质性的潜在原因。荟萃分析显示,与对照医院相比,FIT医院的新入院患者住院护理天数显著减少超过5天。在已存在类似FIT环境的FIT医院中,这种效果更强。两组之间病假方面没有总体显著影响。对新入院患者的进一步荟萃回归显示,与没有此类合同的FIT医院相比,有预先存在类似FIT合同的FIT医院的患者病假时长显著减少近13天。这项研究表明FIT项目对精神障碍患者有积极影响,住院治疗时长更短。此外,在FIT项目启动之前就已存在的合同似乎促进了向新治疗环境的过渡。对于没有此类合同的FIT医院,可能需要一定的实施阶段效果才会显现。由于本手稿仅涵盖18家FIT医院中13家在5年评估期的第一年情况,结果仍应谨慎解读。本研究已在“德国卫生服务研究”数据库中注册(试验编号:VVfD_EVA64_15_003713)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/6fbc86ee1825/fpsyt-11-00131-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/2ead3ababfbd/fpsyt-11-00131-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/59249cfed5f5/fpsyt-11-00131-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/5c8089b222ff/fpsyt-11-00131-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/045561a8d5e9/fpsyt-11-00131-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/cc1a2ef16eae/fpsyt-11-00131-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/6fbc86ee1825/fpsyt-11-00131-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/2ead3ababfbd/fpsyt-11-00131-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/59249cfed5f5/fpsyt-11-00131-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/5c8089b222ff/fpsyt-11-00131-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/045561a8d5e9/fpsyt-11-00131-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/cc1a2ef16eae/fpsyt-11-00131-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bce/7105704/6fbc86ee1825/fpsyt-11-00131-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Global Treatment Budgets for Patients With Mental Disorders-Claims Data Based Meta-Analysis of 13 Controlled Studies From Germany.全球精神障碍患者治疗预算的有效性——基于德国13项对照研究索赔数据的荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 24;11:131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00131. eCollection 2020.
2
The influence of cross-sectoral treatment models on patients with mental disorders in Germany: study protocol of a nationwide long-term evaluation study (EVA64).跨部门治疗模式对德国精神障碍患者的影响:一项全国范围长期评估研究(EVA64)的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 18;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1721-z.
3
Changes in patient care through flexible and integrated treatment programs in German psychiatric hospitals: meta-analyses based on a series of controlled claims-based cohort studies.德国精神病医院通过灵活综合治疗方案实现的患者护理变化:基于一系列基于索赔数据的对照队列研究的荟萃分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05500-0.
4
Lengths of inpatient stay and sick leave of patients with mental diseases: disorder-specific effects of flexible and integrated treatment programs in Germany.精神疾病患者的住院和病假时间:德国灵活综合治疗方案的特定障碍效应。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 7;12(1):370. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02131-5.
5
Evaluation of a flexible and integrative psychiatric care model in a department of child and adolescent psychiatry in Tübingen, Germany: study protocol (EVA_TIBAS).德国图宾根儿童和青少年精神病学系灵活综合精神病护理模式评估:研究方案(EVA_TIBAS)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):1262. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07226-1.
6
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
7
[Reduction of Days in Inpatient Care in Psychiatric Hospitals with Flexible and Integrated Treatment for Patient-Centered Care with a Global Budget - Results with Three-Year Follow-up from the Evaluation Study EVA64].[通过灵活整合以患者为中心的护理并采用全球预算来减少精神病医院住院天数——评估研究EVA64三年随访结果]
Psychiatr Prax. 2021 Apr;48(3):127-134. doi: 10.1055/a-1274-3731. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
[An Experience Report on the Evaluation of New Forms of Care for People with Mental Illness: Pros and Cons of the Use of SHI Claims Data].[关于精神疾病患者新型护理形式评估的经验报告:使用健康保险理赔数据的利弊]
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Jul;86(S 03):S212-S223. doi: 10.1055/a-2297-5347. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
Agreement between self-reports and statutory health insurance claims data on healthcare utilization in patients with mental disorders.精神障碍患者医疗利用的自我报告与法定医疗保险索赔数据之间的一致性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):1243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10175-6.
10
[Flexible and integrative treatment in psychiatry: implementation of specific care components at model and standard care clinics in Germany (PsychCare study)].[精神病学中的灵活综合治疗:德国示范和标准护理诊所特定护理组件的实施(心理护理研究)]
Nervenarzt. 2022 May;93(5):476-482. doi: 10.1007/s00115-021-01238-2. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in patient care through flexible and integrated treatment programs in German psychiatric hospitals: meta-analyses based on a series of controlled claims-based cohort studies.德国精神病医院通过灵活综合治疗方案实现的患者护理变化:基于一系列基于索赔数据的对照队列研究的荟萃分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05500-0.
2
Agreement between self-reports and statutory health insurance claims data on healthcare utilization in patients with mental disorders.精神障碍患者医疗利用的自我报告与法定医疗保险索赔数据之间的一致性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):1243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10175-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
[Methodological Challenges when Using Claims Data of more than 70 Statutory Health Insurances - A Progress Report from the EVA64 Study].[使用70多种法定健康保险理赔数据时的方法学挑战——EVA64研究的进展报告]
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Mar;82(S 01):S4-S12. doi: 10.1055/a-1036-6364. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology.确保良好流行病学实践(GEP)的指南和建议:德国流行病学学会制定的指南。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):301-317. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00500-x. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
3
Evaluation of Flexible and Integrative Psychiatric Treatment Models in Germany-A Mixed-Method Patient and Staff-Oriented Exploratory Study.
Health-related quality of life among patients with treated alcohol use disorders, schizophreniform disorders or affective disorders and the influence of flexible and integrative psychiatric care models in Germany (PsychCare).
德国接受治疗的酒精使用障碍、精神分裂症样障碍或情感障碍患者的健康相关生活质量以及灵活综合精神科护理模式(心理护理)的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 31;14:1068087. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1068087. eCollection 2023.
4
Association between continuity of care and treatment outcomes in psychiatric patients in Germany: a prospective cohort study.德国精神科患者的连续护理与治疗结果的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 19;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04545-x.
5
Lengths of inpatient stay and sick leave of patients with mental diseases: disorder-specific effects of flexible and integrated treatment programs in Germany.精神疾病患者的住院和病假时间:德国灵活综合治疗方案的特定障碍效应。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 7;12(1):370. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02131-5.
6
Needs and Experiences in Psychiatric Treatment (NEPT)- Piloting a Collaboratively Generated, Initial Research Tool to Evaluate Cross-Sectoral Mental Health Services.精神科治疗的需求与体验(NEPT)——试用一种通过合作生成的初始研究工具来评估跨部门心理健康服务
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 27;13:781726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.781726. eCollection 2022.
7
Flexible and Integrative Psychiatric Care Based on a Global Treatment Budget: Comparing the Implementation in Germany and Poland.基于全球治疗预算的灵活综合精神科护理:德国与波兰实施情况的比较
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 7;12:760276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760276. eCollection 2021.
8
Promoting Integrated Care through a Global Treatment Budget: A Qualitative Study in German Mental Health Care using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory.通过全球治疗预算促进综合护理:一项运用罗杰斯创新扩散理论对德国精神卫生保健进行的定性研究
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Nov 30;21(4):27. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5940. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
9
[Flexible and integrative treatment in psychiatry: implementation of specific care components at model and standard care clinics in Germany (PsychCare study)].[精神病学中的灵活综合治疗:德国示范和标准护理诊所特定护理组件的实施(心理护理研究)]
Nervenarzt. 2022 May;93(5):476-482. doi: 10.1007/s00115-021-01238-2. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
10
Evaluation of a flexible and integrative psychiatric care model in a department of child and adolescent psychiatry in Tübingen, Germany: study protocol (EVA_TIBAS).德国图宾根儿童和青少年精神病学系灵活综合精神病护理模式评估:研究方案(EVA_TIBAS)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):1262. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07226-1.
德国灵活综合精神治疗模式评估——一项以患者和工作人员为导向的混合方法探索性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 22;9:785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00785. eCollection 2018.
4
Funding approaches for mental health services: Is there still a role for clustering?心理健康服务的资金筹集方式:集群化是否仍能发挥作用?
BJPsych Adv. 2018 Nov;24(6):412-421. doi: 10.1192/bja.2018.34. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
5
Evaluation of new flexible and integrative psychiatric treatment models in Germany- assessment and preliminary validation of specific program components.德国新型灵活综合精神治疗模式评估——特定项目内容的评估和初步验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1861-1.
6
The influence of cross-sectoral treatment models on patients with mental disorders in Germany: study protocol of a nationwide long-term evaluation study (EVA64).跨部门治疗模式对德国精神障碍患者的影响:一项全国范围长期评估研究(EVA64)的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 18;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1721-z.
7
Financing the Primary Care Behavioral Health Model.为初级保健行为健康模式提供资金。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018 Jun;25(2):197-209. doi: 10.1007/s10880-017-9529-4.
8
Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Integrated Care in a Regional Psychiatry Budget - A Pre-Post Comparison by Secondary Data Analysis.区域精神病学预算中综合护理质量指标的评估——通过二次数据分析进行的前后比较
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Dec 31;16(4):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2479.
9
[Identification of Control Hospitals for the Implementation of the Nationwide and Standardized Evaluation of Model Projects According to § 64b SGB V: Analysis of Data from Structured Quality Reports].[根据《社会法典》第五编第64b条确定用于实施全国性标准化示范项目评估的对照医院:结构化质量报告数据分析]
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Jan;81(1):63-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-116436. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
10
A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen).德国二次数据分析报告标准共识,第2版(STROSA - 二次数据分析标准化报告流程)
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Sep;78(S 01):e145-e160. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108647. Epub 2016 Jun 28.