Alencar Priscila Biaggi Alves de, Palharini Talissa Almeida, Silva Lídia Maurício da, Oliveira Cristiane Moço Canhetti de, Berti Larissa Cristina
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP, Marília (SP), Brasil.
Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP, São José do Rio Preto (SP), Brasil.
Codas. 2020 Apr 3;32(2):e20190002. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20192019002. eCollection 2020.
To identify the indicators of speech fluency that differs subjects with stuttering, with phonological disorder, and with the two disorders in comorbidity.
Thirty subjects aged 4-11 years old were divided into 3 groups, each one with 10 subjects: groups with developmental stuttering (SG), phonological disorder (PDG), and with two diagnoses in comorbidity (SPDG) participated in this study. The procedures were speech fluency and phonology evaluation. The data were submitted to statistical analysis.
Subjects from SG and SPDG showed a greater occurrence of stuttering-like disfluencies and total of disfluencies in relation to the subjects with PDG. Regarding to the other disfluencies, the three groups were similar. Subjects with PDG showed fewer monosyllabic word repetitions, part of word repetition and prolongations in relation to subjects from SG and SPDG. Blocks occurred more frequently in the two groups with stuttering (SG and SPDG) than in the group with PDG. Interjection occurred more frequently in subjects from SG than in PDG.
The PDG was the most differentiated in quantitative and qualitative terms in the three groups analyzed. The similarities and differences between the groups will assist the differential diagnosis and, consequently, will enable improved therapy. The presence of blocks represents an important marker for the diagnosis of stuttering.
确定口吃、语音障碍以及两种障碍共病的受试者在言语流畅性方面的指标差异。
30名4至11岁的受试者被分为3组,每组10人:发育性口吃组(SG)、语音障碍组(PDG)以及两种诊断共病组(SPDG)参与了本研究。研究程序包括言语流畅性和语音评估。数据进行了统计分析。
与PDG组受试者相比,SG组和SPDG组受试者出现口吃样不流畅和总不流畅的情况更多。在其他不流畅方面,三组相似。与SG组和SPDG组受试者相比,PDG组受试者的单音节词重复、单词部分重复和延长情况较少。口吃的两组(SG组和SPDG组)中,阻塞出现的频率高于PDG组。感叹词在SG组受试者中出现的频率高于PDG组。
在分析的三组中,PDG组在数量和质量方面差异最大。各组之间的异同将有助于鉴别诊断,从而实现更好的治疗。阻塞的存在是口吃诊断的一个重要标志。