Cortela Denise da Costa Boamorte, Ferreira Silvana Margarida Benevidez, Virmond Marcos Cunha Lopes, Mieras Liesbeth, Steinmann Peter, Ignotti Eliane, Cavaliero Arielle
Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Cáceres, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Apr 3;36(3):e00068719. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00068719. eCollection 2020.
The aim was to analyze the acceptability of chemoprophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin (PEP) in contacts, index leprosy cases, and health professionals and related factors that can influence adherence. A qualitative content analysis study was performed after application of semi-structured interviews according to the protocol proposed in the LPEP program (2016) drafted at Alta Floresta, Mato Grosso State, Brazil, in July 2016. Study participants included individuals with leprosy, contacts, and health professionals. The QRS NVivo software version 10 was used. A total of 80 individuals were contacted, including 54 (67%) contacts, 11 (14%) index cases, and 15 (19%) health professionals. 94% of the contacts (51/54) took PEP. Three PEP categories were identified: understanding, acceptance, and expectation towards the intervention. Understanding proved to be related to care by the health team. Acceptance (or lack thereof) of the medication was related to fear, trust, and protection, the strategy's operability, self-esteem, and insecurity regarding the intervention. Expectation towards the intervention was related to wellbeing, prevention of the disease, sequelae, decrease in public expenditures, and expanded access. Participants acknowledged the relevance of the PEP strategy based on the possibility of interrupting the transmission chain, reduction in new cases, and improved quality of life. Insecurity in taking the medication and the possibility of the disease manifesting itself had a negative influence on acceptance of PEP, while prior information on the PEP strategy helped strengthen trust in the health professionals and the medication's acceptance.
目的是分析单剂量利福平化学预防(预防性化疗)在接触者、麻风病索引病例和卫生专业人员中的可接受性以及可能影响依从性的相关因素。根据2016年7月在巴西马托格罗索州阿尔塔弗洛雷斯塔起草的LPEP项目(2016年)中提出的方案,在进行半结构化访谈后开展了一项定性内容分析研究。研究参与者包括麻风病患者、接触者和卫生专业人员。使用了QRS NVivo软件版本10。共联系了80人,其中包括54名(67%)接触者、11名(14%)索引病例和15名(19%)卫生专业人员。94%的接触者(51/54)接受了预防性化疗。确定了预防性化疗的三个类别:对干预措施的理解、接受和期望。结果证明,理解与卫生团队的护理有关。对药物的接受(或不接受)与恐惧、信任和保护、该策略的可操作性、自尊以及对干预措施的不安全感有关。对干预措施的期望与幸福感、疾病预防、后遗症、公共支出减少以及扩大可及性有关。参与者认识到预防性化疗策略的相关性,因为其有可能中断传播链、减少新发病例并改善生活质量。服药时的不安全感以及疾病显现的可能性对预防性化疗的接受产生了负面影响,而关于预防性化疗策略的预先信息有助于增强对卫生专业人员的信任以及对药物的接受度。