Suppr超能文献

培哚普利氨氯地平与氯沙坦对原发性高血压患者血压变异性的比较(COMPAS-BPV)

Comparison of Blood Pressure Variability Between Losartan and Amlodipine in Essential Hypertension (COMPAS-BPV).

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Medicine, Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2020 Aug 4;33(8):748-755. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa060.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antihypertensive therapy using renin-angiotensin system blockers and calcium channel blockers to target blood pressure variability (BPV) has not yet been established. We aimed to compare the ability of losartan and amlodipine to lower BPV and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in essential hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned either losartan 50 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Medications were uptitrated and hydrochlorothiazide was added according to protocol for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the office visit-to-visit SD of SBP. The secondary endpoints included average real variability (ARV), office SBP, and home SBP.

RESULTS

The losartan group (n = 71) and amlodipine group (n = 73) finished the scheduled visits between April 2013 and May 2017. The office visit-to-visit SD of SBP was comparable between the losartan and amlodipine groups (11.0 ± 4.2 vs. 10.5 ± 3.8, P = 0.468). The office visit-to-visit ARV of SBP was significantly elevated in the losartan group (10.6 ± 4.3 vs. 9.1 ± 3.4, P = 0.02). The absolute SBP decrement from baseline to 6 months was similar between groups, although the office mean SBP at 6 months was higher in the losartan group (132.3 ± 12.9 vs. 127.5 ± 9.0 mm Hg, P = 0.011). In home blood pressure analysis, evening day-to-day BPV indexes (SD and ARV) were significantly higher in the losartan group at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The lowering effect of the office visit-to-visit SD of SBP was similar between losartan and amlodipine. However, the losartan group showed a higher office visit-to-visit ARV of SBP and evening day-to-day home BPV indexes. Therefore, amlodipine may be better to lower BPV in essential hypertensive patients.

摘要

背景

针对血压变异性(BPV),使用肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂的降压治疗尚未确立。我们旨在比较氯沙坦和氨氯地平降低原发性高血压患者 BPV 和收缩压(SBP)的能力。

方法

患者被随机分配接受氯沙坦 50mg 或氨氯地平 5mg。根据方案,将药物滴定增量并添加氢氯噻嗪,持续 6 个月。主要终点是诊室就诊间 SBP 的标准差。次要终点包括平均真实变异性(ARV)、诊室 SBP 和家庭 SBP。

结果

氯沙坦组(n=71)和氨氯地平组(n=73)在 2013 年 4 月至 2017 年 5 月之间完成了计划就诊。诊室就诊间 SBP 的标准差在氯沙坦和氨氯地平组之间无差异(11.0±4.2 对 10.5±3.8,P=0.468)。氯沙坦组诊室就诊间 SBP 的 ARV 显著升高(10.6±4.3 对 9.1±3.4,P=0.02)。尽管氯沙坦组 6 个月时诊室平均 SBP 更高(132.3±12.9 对 127.5±9.0mmHg,P=0.011),但两组之间从基线到 6 个月时的 SBP 绝对下降量相似。在家庭血压分析中,6 个月时氯沙坦组的夜间日间 BPV 指标(SD 和 ARV)显著更高。

结论

氯沙坦和氨氯地平降低诊室就诊间 SBP 的标准差效果相似。然而,氯沙坦组 SBP 的诊室就诊间 ARV 以及夜间日间家庭 BPV 指标更高。因此,氨氯地平可能更适合降低原发性高血压患者的 BPV。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验