School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Nov;52(11):1043-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
To explore perceptions of program impact among Double Up Food Bucks participants in Oregon.
Data were collected from 1,223 Double Up Food Bucks participants at 42 Oregon farmers' markets. Chi-square tests of independence and logistic regressions were used to examine associations among key variables.
Most participants reported buying more fruits and vegetables (FVs) (91.0%), trying new FV types (82.2%), eating less processed food (69.8%), having more food available at home (81.1%), and perceiving improvements in health (87.9%). Perceptions of affordability were higher among younger adults (P < 0.001) and households with 3-5 people (P = 0.02), with children (P < 0.001), and without chronic disease (P = 0.003). Perceptions of increased FV purchases were higher in households with children (P = 0.009) and reported overall health improvements were higher among non-White participants (P = 0.04). Perceptions of increased FV purchases and affordability were associated with other positive program outcomes.
Participants may perceive barriers to purchasing FVs from farmers' markets, which are not fully addressed by the increased purchasing power from a FV incentive. Targeted redesign, outreach, and education may improve program experiences among groups with less positive perceptions. Further research to identify explanations for variation in program experience is needed.
探讨俄勒冈州“双份食品券”参与者对项目影响的看法。
在俄勒冈州的 42 个农贸市场,对 1223 名“双份食品券”参与者进行了数据收集。使用卡方检验和逻辑回归来检验关键变量之间的关联。
大多数参与者报告购买了更多的水果和蔬菜(91.0%)、尝试了新的水果和蔬菜类型(82.2%)、少吃了加工食品(69.8%)、家里有更多的食物(81.1%),并认为健康状况有所改善(87.9%)。年轻成年人(P<0.001)和有 3-5 人的家庭(P=0.02)、有孩子的家庭(P<0.001)和没有慢性病的家庭(P=0.003)对价格可负担性的看法更高。有孩子的家庭(P=0.009)对增加水果和蔬菜购买量的看法更高,报告整体健康状况改善的非白人群体(P=0.04)更高。对增加水果和蔬菜购买量和价格可负担性的看法与其他积极的项目结果相关。
参与者可能认为从农贸市场购买水果和蔬菜存在障碍,而“双份食品券”增加的购买力并不能完全解决这些障碍。有针对性的重新设计、外展和教育可能会改善对项目感知度较低的群体的项目体验。需要进一步研究以确定项目体验差异的原因。