• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对俄勒冈州农贸市场“双币食品券”项目的看法。

Participant Perceptions of the Double Up Food Bucks Program at Oregon Farmers' Markets.

机构信息

School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Nov;52(11):1043-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2020.02.016
PMID:32268970
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore perceptions of program impact among Double Up Food Bucks participants in Oregon.

METHODS

Data were collected from 1,223 Double Up Food Bucks participants at 42 Oregon farmers' markets. Chi-square tests of independence and logistic regressions were used to examine associations among key variables.

RESULTS

Most participants reported buying more fruits and vegetables (FVs) (91.0%), trying new FV types (82.2%), eating less processed food (69.8%), having more food available at home (81.1%), and perceiving improvements in health (87.9%). Perceptions of affordability were higher among younger adults (P < 0.001) and households with 3-5 people (P = 0.02), with children (P < 0.001), and without chronic disease (P = 0.003). Perceptions of increased FV purchases were higher in households with children (P = 0.009) and reported overall health improvements were higher among non-White participants (P = 0.04). Perceptions of increased FV purchases and affordability were associated with other positive program outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Participants may perceive barriers to purchasing FVs from farmers' markets, which are not fully addressed by the increased purchasing power from a FV incentive. Targeted redesign, outreach, and education may improve program experiences among groups with less positive perceptions. Further research to identify explanations for variation in program experience is needed.

摘要

目的

探讨俄勒冈州“双份食品券”参与者对项目影响的看法。

方法

在俄勒冈州的 42 个农贸市场,对 1223 名“双份食品券”参与者进行了数据收集。使用卡方检验和逻辑回归来检验关键变量之间的关联。

结果

大多数参与者报告购买了更多的水果和蔬菜(91.0%)、尝试了新的水果和蔬菜类型(82.2%)、少吃了加工食品(69.8%)、家里有更多的食物(81.1%),并认为健康状况有所改善(87.9%)。年轻成年人(P<0.001)和有 3-5 人的家庭(P=0.02)、有孩子的家庭(P<0.001)和没有慢性病的家庭(P=0.003)对价格可负担性的看法更高。有孩子的家庭(P=0.009)对增加水果和蔬菜购买量的看法更高,报告整体健康状况改善的非白人群体(P=0.04)更高。对增加水果和蔬菜购买量和价格可负担性的看法与其他积极的项目结果相关。

结论和意义

参与者可能认为从农贸市场购买水果和蔬菜存在障碍,而“双份食品券”增加的购买力并不能完全解决这些障碍。有针对性的重新设计、外展和教育可能会改善对项目感知度较低的群体的项目体验。需要进一步研究以确定项目体验差异的原因。

相似文献

1
Participant Perceptions of the Double Up Food Bucks Program at Oregon Farmers' Markets.消费者对俄勒冈州农贸市场“双币食品券”项目的看法。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Nov;52(11):1043-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
2
A Qualitative Evaluation of Double Up Food Bucks Farmers' Market Incentive Program Access.双币食品券农贸市场激励计划准入情况的定性评估。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Jul;52(7):705-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.11.010. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.果蔬激励计划对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者的影响:计划结构的范围综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 4;12(6):1676. doi: 10.3390/nu12061676.
4
Opportunities and Challenges of California's Fruit and Vegetable Electronic Benefit Transfer Pilot Project at Farmers' Markets: A Qualitative Study with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Shoppers and Farmers' Market Staff.加利福尼亚州农贸市场水果和蔬菜电子福利转账试点项目的机遇与挑战:对补充营养援助计划购物者和农贸市场工作人员的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 5;16(19):3388. doi: 10.3390/nu16193388.
5
The California Nutrition Incentive Program: Participants' Perceptions and Associations with Produce Purchases, Consumption, and Food Security.加利福尼亚营养激励计划:参与者对购买、消费农产品和食品安全的看法及关联。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 29;14(13):2699. doi: 10.3390/nu14132699.
6
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Shopping Behaviors and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of Farmers' Market Incentive Program Users in Illinois.伊利诺伊州农贸市场激励计划使用者的购物行为和果蔬消费的种族/民族差异。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jan 16;30(1):109-118. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.1.109. eCollection 2020 Winter.
7
Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Prices between Farmers' Markets and Supermarkets: Implications for Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Food Assistance Program Participants.农贸市场和超市的果蔬价格比较:对食品援助计划参与者的果蔬激励计划的启示。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 28;14(9):1842. doi: 10.3390/nu14091842.
8
Implementing a farmers' market incentive program: perspectives on the New York City Health Bucks Program.实施农贸市场激励计划:对纽约市健康券计划的看法。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Aug 29;10:E145. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120285.
9
Farmers' market shopping and dietary behaviours among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants.补充营养援助计划参与者的农贸市场购物与饮食行为
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2407-14. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001111. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
10
Farmers' Market Use Patterns Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients With High Access to Farmers' Markets.在有高机会接触农贸市场的补充营养援助计划受助者中农贸市场的使用模式
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 May;49(5):397-404.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher Fruit and Vegetable Intake Is Associated with Participation in the Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB) Program.较高的水果和蔬菜摄入量与参与双加食品券(DUFB)计划有关。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 29;13(8):2607. doi: 10.3390/nu13082607.