• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农贸市场和超市的果蔬价格比较:对食品援助计划参与者的果蔬激励计划的启示。

Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Prices between Farmers' Markets and Supermarkets: Implications for Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Food Assistance Program Participants.

机构信息

Nutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland, CA 94607, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Apr 28;14(9):1842. doi: 10.3390/nu14091842.

DOI:10.3390/nu14091842
PMID:35565810
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9104456/
Abstract

This cross-sectional study was part of a larger evaluation of a fruit and vegetable (FV) incentive program for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants in California. We examined the price differences in FV to explore whether these could help explain a previously observed lack of effect of the incentive program on FV consumption. Differences by type (organic/no-spray or conventional), among a convenience sample of farmers' markets ( = 11) and nearby supermarkets ( = 7), were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests adjusting for clustering by market. We calculated the cost of market baskets comprising recommended FV servings for a household using median prices to consider the implications of FV price differences for SNAP shoppers who use financial incentives for FV. We found that farmers' markets primarily offered organic FV while supermarkets primarily offered conventionally grown FV. Farmers' market prices tended to be lower than supermarkets for organic FV but higher for conventional FV. Compared to supermarkets, the market basket composed only of organic FV cost USD 16.34 less at farmers' markets, whereas a basket comprised of a mix of conventionally and organically grown FV cost USD 3.68 more. These differences warrant further exploration; FV price and type should be considered in studies aimed at understanding the impact of SNAP financial incentive programs.

摘要

本横断面研究是对加利福尼亚州补充营养援助计划 (SNAP) 参与者水果和蔬菜 (FV) 激励计划进行更广泛评估的一部分。我们研究了 FV 的价格差异,以探讨这些差异是否可以帮助解释激励计划对 FV 消费缺乏影响的原因。在农贸市场(n = 11)和附近超市(n = 7)的便利样本中,通过市场聚类调整的 Wilcoxon 秩和检验评估了不同类型(有机/无喷雾或常规)之间的差异。我们使用中位数价格计算了包含推荐 FV 份量的家庭用市场篮子的成本,以考虑 FV 价格差异对使用 FV 经济激励的 SNAP 购物者的影响。我们发现,农贸市场主要提供有机 FV,而超市主要提供传统种植的 FV。农贸市场的有机 FV 价格往往低于超市,但传统 FV 的价格高于超市。与超市相比,农贸市场的纯有机 FV 市场篮子成本低 16.34 美元,而由传统和有机种植的 FV 混合组成的篮子成本高 3.68 美元。这些差异值得进一步探讨;在旨在了解 SNAP 经济激励计划影响的研究中,应考虑 FV 的价格和类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0f8/9104456/bfcdec1c4869/nutrients-14-01842-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0f8/9104456/bfcdec1c4869/nutrients-14-01842-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0f8/9104456/bfcdec1c4869/nutrients-14-01842-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Prices between Farmers' Markets and Supermarkets: Implications for Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Food Assistance Program Participants.农贸市场和超市的果蔬价格比较:对食品援助计划参与者的果蔬激励计划的启示。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 28;14(9):1842. doi: 10.3390/nu14091842.
2
Opportunities and Challenges of California's Fruit and Vegetable Electronic Benefit Transfer Pilot Project at Farmers' Markets: A Qualitative Study with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Shoppers and Farmers' Market Staff.加利福尼亚州农贸市场水果和蔬菜电子福利转账试点项目的机遇与挑战:对补充营养援助计划购物者和农贸市场工作人员的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 5;16(19):3388. doi: 10.3390/nu16193388.
3
Understanding Impacts of SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program at Farmers' Markets: Findings from a 13 State RCT.理解 SNAP 水果和蔬菜激励计划在农贸市场的影响:来自 13 个州 RCT 的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127443.
4
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Shopping Behaviors and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of Farmers' Market Incentive Program Users in Illinois.伊利诺伊州农贸市场激励计划使用者的购物行为和果蔬消费的种族/民族差异。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jan 16;30(1):109-118. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.1.109. eCollection 2020 Winter.
5
The California Nutrition Incentive Program: Participants' Perceptions and Associations with Produce Purchases, Consumption, and Food Security.加利福尼亚营养激励计划:参与者对购买、消费农产品和食品安全的看法及关联。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 29;14(13):2699. doi: 10.3390/nu14132699.
6
Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.果蔬激励计划对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者的影响:计划结构的范围综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 4;12(6):1676. doi: 10.3390/nu12061676.
7
Between- and within-Group Differences in Fruit and Vegetable Purchases, Consumption, and BMI among Hispanic Farmers' Market Shoppers Who Use SNAP.使用 SNAP 的拉美裔农贸市场购物者在水果和蔬菜购买、消费和 BMI 方面的组间和组内差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 21;18(18):9923. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189923.
8
Patterns of fruit and vegetable availability and price competitiveness across four seasons are different in local food outlets and supermarkets.当地食品店和超市中,水果和蔬菜的供应模式以及四个季节的价格竞争力各不相同。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Oct;18(15):2846-54. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000981. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
Associations between farmers' market shopping behaviours and objectively measured and self-reported fruit and vegetable intake in a diverse sample of farmers' market shoppers: a cross-sectional study in New York City and rural North Carolina.在纽约市和北卡罗来纳州农村地区多样化的农贸市场购物者样本中,农贸市场购物行为与通过客观测量和自我报告的水果和蔬菜摄入量之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Mar;25(3):600-606. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004602. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Reducing Food Insecurity and Improving Fruit and Vegetable Intake Among Farmers' Market Incentive Program Participants.减少农贸市场激励计划参与者的粮食不安全状况并提高其水果和蔬菜摄入量。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-76.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities and Challenges of California's Fruit and Vegetable Electronic Benefit Transfer Pilot Project at Farmers' Markets: A Qualitative Study with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Shoppers and Farmers' Market Staff.加利福尼亚州农贸市场水果和蔬菜电子福利转账试点项目的机遇与挑战:对补充营养援助计划购物者和农贸市场工作人员的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 5;16(19):3388. doi: 10.3390/nu16193388.
2
The California Nutrition Incentive Program: Participants' Perceptions and Associations with Produce Purchases, Consumption, and Food Security.加利福尼亚营养激励计划:参与者对购买、消费农产品和食品安全的看法及关联。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 29;14(13):2699. doi: 10.3390/nu14132699.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentives on Household Fruit and Vegetable Expenditures.食物不安全营养激励对家庭水果和蔬菜支出的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 May;53(5):418-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.10.022. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
2
Double Up Food Bucks Participation is Associated with Increased Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Food Security Among Low-Income Adults.双倍食品券参与度与低收入成年人增加水果和蔬菜消费及粮食安全相关。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Mar;51(3):342-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
An Assessment of Perceived Barriers to Farmers' Market Access.
对农贸市场准入感知障碍的评估。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Jan;51(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.07.020. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Fruits and vegetables at home (FLAM): a randomized controlled trial of the impact of fruits and vegetables vouchers in children from low-income families in an urban district of France.家庭水果和蔬菜计划(FLAM):一项在法国城区低收入家庭儿童中实施水果和蔬菜代金券的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 28;18(1):1065. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5908-5.
5
Disparities in State-Specific Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption - United States, 2015.2015年美国各州成人水果和蔬菜消费量的差异
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Nov 17;66(45):1241-1247. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6645a1.
6
Diet Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Score, and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.基于健康饮食指数、替代健康饮食指数、停止高血压膳食方法评分和健康结果评估的饮食质量:一项更新的队列研究系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jan;118(1):74-100.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
7
Fruit and vegetable intake among participants in a District of Columbia farmers' market incentive programme.参与者在哥伦比亚特区农贸市场激励计划中的水果和蔬菜摄入量。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb;21(3):601-606. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003020. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: a comprehensive review.有机食品和有机农业对人类健康的影响:全面综述
Environ Health. 2017 Oct 27;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0315-4.
9
Factors associated with continued participation in a matched monetary incentive programme at local farmers' markets in low-income neighbourhoods in San Diego, California.加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥低收入社区当地农贸市场参与匹配货币激励计划的持续相关因素。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Oct;20(15):2786-2795. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001549. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
10
Understanding the Experiences of Low-Income Individuals Receiving Farmers' Market Incentives in the United States: A Qualitative Study.了解美国低收入人群接受农贸市场激励措施的经历:一项定性研究。
Health Promot Pract. 2017 Nov;18(6):869-878. doi: 10.1177/1524839917715438. Epub 2017 Jul 2.