• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院成年人中有害诊断错误的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

VA Connecticut Health System West Haven Campus, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):1008-1018. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822
PMID:32269070
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic error is commonly defined as a missed, delayed or wrong diagnosis and has been described as among the most important patient safety hazards. Diagnostic errors also account for the largest category of medical malpractice high severity claims and total payouts. Despite a large literature on the incidence of inpatient adverse events, no systematic review has attempted to estimate the prevalence and nature of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane library from database inception through 9 July 2019. We included all studies of hospitalised adult patients that used physician review of case series of admissions and reported the frequency of diagnostic adverse events. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted study characteristics and assessed risk of bias. Harmful diagnostic error rates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies including 80 026 patients and 760 harmful diagnostic errors from consecutive or randomly selected cohorts were pooled. The pooled rate was 0.7% (95% CI 0.5% to 1.1%). Of the 136 diagnostic errors that were described in detail, a wide range of diseases were missed, the most common being malignancy (n=15, 11%) and pulmonary embolism (n=13, 9.6%). In the USA, these estimates correspond to approximately 249 900 harmful diagnostic errors yearly.

CONCLUSION

Based on physician review, at least 0.7% of adult admissions involve a harmful diagnostic error. A wide range of diseases are missed, including many common diseases. Fourteen diagnoses account for more than half of all diagnostic errors. The finding that a wide range of common diagnoses are missed implies that efforts to improve diagnosis must target the basic processes of diagnosis, including both cognitive and system-related factors.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018115186.

摘要

背景

诊断错误通常被定义为漏诊、延迟诊断或误诊,已被描述为最重要的患者安全隐患之一。诊断错误也是医疗事故中导致最高赔偿金额的最大类别。尽管有大量关于住院患者不良事件发生率的文献,但尚无系统评价试图估计住院患者中有害诊断错误的流行率和性质。

方法

我们使用 Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆,从数据库建立到 2019 年 7 月 9 日,进行了系统文献检索。我们纳入了所有使用医师审查住院患者病例系列并报告诊断不良事件频率的研究。两名评审员独立筛选纳入研究,提取研究特征并评估偏倚风险。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总有害诊断错误率。

结果

纳入了 22 项研究,共纳入 80026 例患者和 760 例有害诊断错误,这些研究来自连续或随机选择的队列。汇总率为 0.7%(95%CI 0.5%~1.1%)。在详细描述的 136 个诊断错误中,范围广泛的疾病被漏诊,最常见的是恶性肿瘤(n=15,11%)和肺栓塞(n=13,9.6%)。在美国,这些估计值相当于每年约有 249900 例有害诊断错误。

结论

基于医师审查,至少 0.7%的成年患者入院时发生有害诊断错误。漏诊的疾病范围广泛,包括许多常见疾病。14 种诊断占所有诊断错误的一半以上。发现广泛的常见诊断被漏诊意味着,提高诊断质量的努力必须针对诊断的基本过程,包括认知和系统相关因素。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018115186。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.住院成年人中有害诊断错误的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):1008-1018. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
4
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.非 ICU 住院患者预防谵妄的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 26;11(11):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub3.
5
Rate of Preventable Mortality in Hospitalized Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.住院患者可预防死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2099-2106. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05592-5. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿科住院患者不良事件的发生率和特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):133-149. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
7
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.非 ICU 住院患者预防谵妄的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub2.
8
Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.40 岁及以上成年人在初级保健中进行脆性骨折一级预防的筛查:筛查和治疗效果及可接受性以及风险预测工具准确性的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 21;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02181-w.
9
Adverse diagnostic events in hospitalised patients: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study.住院患者的不良诊断事件:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 May 19;34(6):377-388. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017183.
10
Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.住院有营养风险的成年人的营养支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 19;5(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying diagnostic errors in the emergency department using trigger-based strategies.使用基于触发机制的策略识别急诊科的诊断错误。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Aug 6;14(3):e003389. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003389.
2
The hidden dangers in routine medical complaints: uncovering patient harm.常规医疗投诉中的隐患:发现患者受到的伤害。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13105-w.
3
The role of cardiac ultrasound virtual simulation technology in the construction of clinical diagnostic reasoning of structural heart diseases.
心脏超声虚拟模拟技术在结构性心脏病临床诊断推理构建中的作用
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07225-4.
4
Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases.诊断过程中的错误和弱点模式:对两个国家数据库中的医疗事故索赔和不良事件的回顾性分析
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 23;14(1):e003198. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003198.
5
Just how many diagnostic errors and harms are out there, really? It depends on how you count.到底有多少诊断错误和危害呢?实际上,这取决于你如何去统计。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 May 19;34(6):355-360. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017967.
6
Recommendations for Clinicians, Technologists, and Healthcare Organizations on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Position Statement from the Society of General Internal Medicine.普通内科医学协会关于临床医生、技术专家和医疗保健组织在医学中使用生成式人工智能的建议:立场声明
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):694-702. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09102-0. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
7
To Err Is Human: A Quarter Century of Progress.《人非圣贤,孰能无过:25年的进步历程》
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):690-693. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09087-w. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
8
"I Had No Idea This Happened": Electronic Feedback on Clinical Reasoning for Hospitalists.“我对此一无所知”:针对住院医师临床推理的电子反馈
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3271-3277. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09058-1. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
9
Accuracy Evaluation of GPT-Assisted Differential Diagnosis in Emergency Department.急诊科GPT辅助鉴别诊断的准确性评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;14(16):1779. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161779.
10
Evaluation of a Natural Language Processing Approach to Identify Diagnostic Errors and Analysis of Safety Learning System Case Review Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.自然语言处理方法评估诊断错误及安全学习系统病例回顾数据分析:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 26;26:e50935. doi: 10.2196/50935.