• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inter-surgeon variability in the identification of clock face landmarks when placing suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair.关节镜下Bankart修复术中放置缝线锚钉时术者间在识别钟面标志方面的差异。
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Dec;11(6):419-423. doi: 10.1177/1758573218797964. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
2
Inferior suture anchor placement during arthroscopic Bankart repair: influence of portal placement and curved drill guide.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术中下缝线锚钉的放置:入路位置和弯钻头导向器的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1182-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514523722. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
3
Beach Chair Versus Lateral Decubitus Position: Differences in Suture Anchor Position and Number During Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization.沙滩椅位与侧卧位:关节镜下前肩稳定术中缝合锚钉位置和数量的差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;49(8):2020-2026. doi: 10.1177/03635465211013709. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Inferior anchor cortical perforation with arthroscopic Bankart repair: a cadaveric study.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术致下锚皮质骨穿孔:尸体研究。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.013.
5
Morphological Characteristics of the Repaired Labrum According to Glenoid Location and Its Clinical Relevance After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: Postoperative Evaluation With Computed Tomography Arthrography.关节镜下Bankart修复术后根据肩胛盂位置观察修复盂唇的形态学特征及其临床相关性:计算机断层扫描关节造影术后评估
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1304-14. doi: 10.1177/0363546514528791. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
6
Differences in Failure Mode Between Simple and Mattress Suture Configuration in Arthroscopic Bankart Repairs: A Cadaveric Study.关节镜下Bankart修复术中单纯缝合与褥式缝合构型的失败模式差异:一项尸体研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Aug 17;8(8):2325967120942133. doi: 10.1177/2325967120942133. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Trans-subscapularis portal versus low-anterior portal for low anchor placement on the inferior glenoid fossa: a cadaveric shoulder study with computed tomographic analysis.用于在肩胛盂下极进行低位锚钉置入的经肩胛下肌入路与前低位入路:一项基于计算机断层扫描分析的尸体肩部研究
Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb;31(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
8
Does anchor insertion angle or placement of the suture anchor affect glenoid rim fracture occurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair?关节镜下 Bankart 修复后,锚钉的置入角度或位置是否会影响肩盂骨缘骨折的发生?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Apr;29(4):e124-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
9
Fluoroscopy-Guided Suture Anchor Placement Yields Excellent Accuracy for Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Repair: A Cadaveric Study.透视引导下缝线锚钉置入用于关节镜下髋臼盂唇修复的准确性极佳:一项尸体研究
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 19;3(5):e1505-e1511. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.012. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
Postoperative Recurrence of Instability Due to New Anterior Glenoid Rim Fractures After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.关节镜下Bankart修复术后因新的前盂缘骨折导致的不稳定术后复发
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;45(12):2840-2848. doi: 10.1177/0363546517714476. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Arthroscopic Treatment of Discoid Lateral Meniscus and Postoperative Restrictions in Children: Results of a Multicenter Meniscus Study Group Survey.儿童盘状外侧半月板的关节镜治疗差异及术后限制:多中心半月板研究小组调查结果
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 May 7;13(5):23259671251333107. doi: 10.1177/23259671251333107. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Inferior suture anchor placement during arthroscopic Bankart repair: influence of portal placement and curved drill guide.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术中下缝线锚钉的放置:入路位置和弯钻头导向器的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1182-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514523722. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
2
Restoring the labral height for treatment of Bankart lesions: a comparison of suture anchor constructs.修复盂唇高度治疗 Bankart 损伤:缝线锚钉结构的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2010 May;26(5):587-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.09.010. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
3
Four-quadrant approach to capsulolabral repair: an arthroscopic road map to the glenoid.四象限法治疗盂唇-关节囊复合体损伤:关节镜下的肩胛盂入路图谱
Arthroscopy. 2010 Apr;26(4):555-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.09.019.
4
A meta-analysis of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors.关节镜下缝线锚定与开放 Bankart 修复术治疗 Bankart 损伤的荟萃分析
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Dec;18(12):1742-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1093-5. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
5
The relation of the coracoid process to the glenoid: an anatomic study.喙突与关节盂的关系:一项解剖学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug;25(8):846-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.01.022.
6
Variations of the intra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon: a classification of embryologically explained variations.肱二头肌长头肌腱关节内部分的变异:基于胚胎学解释的变异分类
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;18(4):556-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.006.
7
Is arthroscopic surgery for stabilisation of chronic shoulder instability as effective as open surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 studies including 3044 arthroscopic operations.关节镜手术治疗慢性肩关节不稳定的稳定性与开放手术一样有效吗?一项对62项研究(包括3044例关节镜手术)的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Sep;89(9):1188-96. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18467.
8
Anatomic variations in the long head of biceps: contribution to shoulder dysfunction.肱二头肌长头的解剖变异:对肩部功能障碍的影响
Arthroscopy. 2007 Sep;23(9):1012-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.05.007.
9
The inter-rater reliability of shoulder arthroscopy.肩关节镜检查的评分者间信度。
Arthroscopy. 2007 Sep;23(9):971-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.005. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
10
Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair.关节镜下Bankart修复术后肩关节不稳定复发的危险因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1755-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00817.

关节镜下Bankart修复术中放置缝线锚钉时术者间在识别钟面标志方面的差异。

Inter-surgeon variability in the identification of clock face landmarks when placing suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair.

作者信息

Petrera Massimo, Ogilvie-Harris Darrell J, Theodoropoulos John S, Chahal Jaskarndip, Wasserstein David, Veillette Christian, Linda Dorota, Dwyer Tim

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM) Program, Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Dec;11(6):419-423. doi: 10.1177/1758573218797964. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1177/1758573218797964
PMID:32269601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7094062/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of surgeons in utilizing the clock face method for anchor placement has never been investigated. Our hypothesis was that shoulder arthroscopy surgeons would be able to place suture anchors at predetermined positions with accuracy and reliability.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric shoulders were used. Five fellowship-trained shoulder arthroscopy surgeons were directed to place a suture anchor at 3:30, 4:30, and 5:30 clock in two shoulders each. The position of the anchors was determined with computed tomography. The accuracy of placement was calculated and data analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. The intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy was 57%. The accuracy of anchor placement at the 3:30 position was 40% (average position 2:24 o'clock), it was 50% at the 4:30 position (average position 3:42 o'clock) and 80% at the 5:30 position (average position 5:03 o'clock). No statistical difference in accuracy between the placement of the superior, middle, and inferior anchors (p = 0.145) was seen. The intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-surgeon reliability was 0.4 (fair) while the intraclass correlation coefficient for intra-surgeon reliability was 0.6 (moderate).

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study suggest a moderate degree of accuracy and fair to moderate inter- and intra-surgeon reliability when using the clock face system to guide anchor placement.

摘要

背景

外科医生运用钟面法放置锚钉的准确性从未被研究过。我们的假设是,肩关节镜外科医生能够准确且可靠地将缝线锚钉放置在预定位置。

方法

使用了10具尸体肩部标本。5名接受过专科培训的肩关节镜外科医生被要求在每具尸体的两个肩部上,分别在钟面的3:30、4:30和5:30位置放置一个缝线锚钉。通过计算机断层扫描确定锚钉的位置。计算放置的准确性,并采用单因素方差分析进行数据分析。计算组内相关系数。

结果

总体准确率为57%。在3:30位置放置锚钉的准确率为40%(平均位置为2:24),在4:30位置为50%(平均位置为3:42),在5:30位置为80%(平均位置为5:03)。上、中、下锚钉放置的准确性之间未见统计学差异(p = 0.145)。外科医生间可靠性的组内相关系数为0.4(一般),而外科医生内可靠性的组内相关系数为0.6(中等)。

讨论

本研究结果表明,在使用钟面系统指导锚钉放置时,准确性为中等程度,外科医生间及外科医生内的可靠性为一般到中等。