Yue Toshimitzu, Khosa Faisal
Medical Education and Simulation, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, CAN.
Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, CAN.
Cureus. 2020 Mar 8;12(3):e7205. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7205.
Introduction Academic medicine is notorious for being "male-dominated." We hypothesized that there were significant and quantifiable levels of gender disparity in academic orthopedic surgery, and this article attempts to quantify the extent of the existing disparity. Also, we examined the research productivity of academic faculty in orthopedic surgery and its correlation with academic ranks and leadership positions. Methods Our study design was cross-sectional in nature. We searched the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) to compile a list of medical schools that offer orthopedic surgery training for residency. A total of 713 academic orthopedic surgeons met our inclusion criteria. Of the 713 orthopedic surgeons, 518 had an H-index score available on Elsevier's Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands). The gender, academic rank, leadership position, and H-index were compared. Data analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS; IBM, Armonk, NY). The binomial negative regression was used to compare the average H-index between men and women at each rank. Results Our study results reveal that academic orthopedic surgery in Canada is male-dominated, with men holding 87% of the academic positions. Female academic orthopedic surgeons held lower academic ranks, such as assistant professor or lecturer. Women orthopedic surgeons had lower H-index scores compared to their counterparts in ranks above the assistant professor. Our findings imply that research productivity and the ratio of average H-index scores comparing men to women (HM/HF) grow larger with each academic rank. At a 90% confidence level, women were less likely to hold leadership positions than men at an odds ratio (OR) of 0.52 [90% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-0.925, p: 0.03]. There were no significant differences in H-index between men and women for departmental leadership positions. Conclusion Women were underrepresented in number, rank, and academic productivity (H-index). We offer possible factors that may have contributed to this finding as well as potential solutions.
引言 学术医学因“男性主导”而声名狼藉。我们假设在学术性骨外科领域存在显著且可量化的性别差异,本文旨在量化现有差异的程度。此外,我们研究了骨外科领域学术教员的研究产出及其与学术职级和领导职位的相关性。
方法 我们的研究设计本质上是横断面研究。我们搜索了加拿大住院医师匹配服务(CaRMS),以编制提供骨外科住院医师培训的医学院校名单。共有713名学术性骨外科医生符合我们的纳入标准。在这713名骨外科医生中,518人在爱思唯尔的Scopus(爱思唯尔,荷兰阿姆斯特丹)上有H指数得分。对性别、学术职级、领导职位和H指数进行了比较。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS;IBM,纽约州阿蒙克)进行数据分析。采用二项式负回归来比较各职级男性和女性的平均H指数。
结果 我们的研究结果显示,加拿大的学术性骨外科领域以男性为主导,男性占据了87%的学术职位。女性学术性骨外科医生担任较低的学术职级,如助理教授或讲师。与助理教授以上职级的同行相比,女性骨外科医生的H指数得分较低。我们的研究结果表明,随着学术职级的提升,研究产出以及男性与女性平均H指数得分之比(HM/HF)越来越大。在90%的置信水平下,女性担任领导职位的可能性低于男性,优势比(OR)为0.52 [90%置信区间(CI):0.29 - 0.925,p:0.03]。担任部门领导职位的男性和女性在H指数上没有显著差异。
结论 女性在人数、职级和学术产出(H指数)方面代表性不足。我们提出了可能导致这一结果的因素以及潜在的解决方案。