Chen Szu-Yu Tina, Jalal Sabeena, Ahmadi Maryam, Khurshid Kiran, Bhulani Nizar, Rehman Ateeq U, Ahmad Aftab, Ding Jeffrey, Aldred Terri-Leigh R, Khosa Faisal
Family Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN.
Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, CAN.
Cureus. 2020 May 30;12(5):e8368. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8368.
Background Women physicians continue to comprise the minority of leadership roles in Academic Family Medicine (AFM) faculty across North American medical schools. Our study quantified the current state of gender disparity by analyzing academic position, leadership ranking, and research productivity. Methods We generated a database for 6,746 AFM faculty members. Gender and academic profiles were obtained for 2,892 academic ranks and 1,706 leadership roles by searching faculty listings enlisted in Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA) and Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS). To measure research productivity, we obtained bibliometric data: h-index, citations, and tenure from 2,383 faculty members using Elsevier's SCOPUS archives. Data analysis and h-index were formulated using Stata version 14.2 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Results Our results indicated that women hold 46.11% (3,110/6,746) of faculty positions. The proportional composition decreased with increasing academic ranking (49.84% assistant, 46.78% associate, and 41.5% full professor). The same decreasing trend was demonstrated with leadership rank (57.14% minor leadership, 47.65% second-in-command, and 36.61 first-in-command). Compared to their gender counterparts, women in AFM demonstrated lower publication productivity as measured by citation number (p=0.04) and years of study (p=0.008). The final prediction equation model after multivariable analyses included gender, publications, citations, country of graduation, and years of active research (p<0.05). Conclusions The composition of academic family medicine faculty members included in this study demonstrated gender disparity. Inclusivity initiatives and policies to tackle the issue of female retention, promotion, and recruitment need to be further explored.
背景 在北美医学院校的学术家庭医学(AFM)教员中,女性医生在领导职位上仍占少数。我们的研究通过分析学术职位、领导排名和研究生产力来量化当前性别差异的状况。方法 我们为6746名AFM教员建立了一个数据库。通过搜索在奖学金和住院医师电子互动数据库(FREIDA)和加拿大住院医师匹配服务(CaRMS)中登记的教员名单,获取了2892个学术职级和1706个领导职位的性别和学术概况。为了衡量研究生产力,我们使用爱思唯尔的Scopus数据库获取了2383名教员的文献计量数据:h指数、引用次数和任期。使用Stata 14.2版本(StataCorp LP,德克萨斯州大学站)进行数据分析并计算h指数。结果 我们的结果表明,女性占据了46.11%(3110/6746)的教员职位。随着学术职级的提高,比例构成下降(助理教授为49.84%,副教授为46.78%,正教授为41.5%)。领导排名也呈现出相同的下降趋势(次要领导为57.