Department of Psychology, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Jun;53(6):926-936. doi: 10.1002/eat.23273. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Rejection sensitivity and justice sensitivity are personality traits that are characterized by frequent perceptions and intense adverse responses to negative social cues. Whereas there is good evidence for associations between rejection sensitivity, justice sensitivity, and internalizing problems, no longitudinal studies have investigated their association with eating disorder (ED) pathology so far. Thus, the present study examined longitudinal relations between rejection sensitivity, justice sensitivity, and ED pathology.
Participants (N = 769) reported on their rejection sensitivity, justice sensitivity, and ED pathology at 9-19 (T1), 11-21 (T2), and 14-22 years of age (T3).
Latent cross-lagged models showed longitudinal associations between ED pathology and anxious rejection sensitivity, observer and victim justice sensitivity. T1 and T2 ED pathology predicted higher T2 and T3 anxious rejection sensitivity, respectively. In turn, T2 anxious rejection sensitivity predicted more T3 ED pathology. T1 observer justice sensitivity predicted more T2 ED pathology, which predicted higher T3 observer justice sensitivity. Furthermore, T1 ED pathology predicted higher T2 victim justice sensitivity.
Rejection sensitivity-particularly anxious rejection sensitivity-and justice sensitivity may be involved in the maintenance or worsening of ED pathology and should be considered by future research and in prevention and treatment of ED pathology. Also, mental health problems may increase rejection sensitivity and justice sensitivity traits in the long term.
拒绝敏感性和公正敏感性是人格特质,其特征是频繁感知和对负面社会线索产生强烈的负面反应。虽然有充分的证据表明拒绝敏感性、公正敏感性与内化问题之间存在关联,但迄今为止,尚无纵向研究调查它们与饮食障碍(ED)病理之间的关联。因此,本研究探讨了拒绝敏感性、公正敏感性与 ED 病理之间的纵向关系。
参与者(N=769)在 9-19 岁(T1)、11-21 岁(T2)和 14-22 岁(T3)时报告了他们的拒绝敏感性、公正敏感性和 ED 病理。
潜在的交叉滞后模型显示 ED 病理与焦虑性拒绝敏感性、观察者和受害者公正敏感性之间存在纵向关联。T1 和 T2 的 ED 病理分别预测了更高的 T2 和 T3 焦虑性拒绝敏感性。反过来,T2 的焦虑性拒绝敏感性预测了更多的 T3 ED 病理。T1 的观察者公正敏感性预测了更多的 T2 ED 病理,这预测了更高的 T3 观察者公正敏感性。此外,T1 的 ED 病理预测了更高的 T2 受害者公正敏感性。
拒绝敏感性——特别是焦虑性拒绝敏感性——和公正敏感性可能参与了 ED 病理的维持或恶化,应该在未来的研究中以及在 ED 病理的预防和治疗中考虑。此外,心理健康问题可能会导致长期的拒绝敏感性和公正敏感性增加。