Bondü Rebecca, Holl Anna K, Trommler Denny, Schmitt Manfred J
Department of Psychology, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 10;13:858291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858291. eCollection 2022.
Anger, indignation, guilt, rumination, victim compensation, and perpetrator punishment are considered primary responses associated with justice sensitivity (JS). However, injustice and high JS may predispose to further responses. We had = 293 adults rate their JS, 17 potential responses toward 12 unjust scenarios from the victim's, observer's, beneficiary's, and perpetrator's perspectives, and several control variables. Unjust situations generally elicited many affective, cognitive, and behavioral responses. JS generally predisposed to strong affective responses toward injustice, including sadness, pity, disappointment, and helplessness. It impaired trivialization, victim-blaming, or justification, which may otherwise help cope with injustice. It predisposed to conflict solutions and victim compensation. Particularly victim and beneficiary JS had stronger effects in unjust situations from the corresponding perspective. These findings add to a better understanding of the main and interaction effects of unjust situations from different perspectives and the JS facets, differences between the JS facets, as well as the links between JS and behavior and well-being.
愤怒、愤慨、内疚、反复思考、对受害者的补偿以及对作恶者的惩罚被视为与正义敏感性（JS）相关的主要反应。然而，不公正和高正义敏感性可能会引发进一步的反应。我们让293名成年人对他们的正义敏感性、从受害者、观察者、受益者和作恶者的角度对12种不公正情景的17种潜在反应以及几个控制变量进行评分。不公正的情况通常会引发许多情感、认知和行为反应。正义敏感性通常会使人对不公正产生强烈的情感反应，包括悲伤、同情、失望和无助。它会抑制轻视、指责受害者或为其辩解的行为，而这些行为原本可能有助于应对不公正。它会倾向于冲突解决方案和对受害者的补偿。特别是受害者和受益者的正义敏感性在相应视角下的不公正情况中具有更强的影响。这些发现有助于更好地理解不同视角下不公正情况和正义敏感性各个方面的主要影响及相互作用、正义敏感性各个方面之间的差异，以及正义敏感性与行为和幸福感之间的联系。
