• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群组电子手部卫生监测在住院病房中的应用:一项多中心集群随机质量改进研究。

Introduction of Group Electronic Monitoring of Hand Hygiene on Inpatient Units: A Multicenter Cluster Randomized Quality Improvement Study.

机构信息

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):e680-e685. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa412.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa412
PMID:32270865
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current approach to measuring hand hygiene (HH) relies on human auditors who capture <1% of HH opportunities and rapidly become recognized by staff, resulting in inflation in performance. Group electronic monitoring is a validated method of measuring HH adherence, but data demonstrating the clinical impact of this technology are lacking.

METHODS

A stepped-wedge cluster randomized quality improvement study was performed on 26 inpatient medical and surgical units across 5 acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada. The intervention involved daily HH reporting as measured by group electronic monitoring to guide unit-led improvement strategies. The primary outcome was monthly HH adherence (percentage) between baseline and intervention. Secondary outcomes included transmission of antibiotic-resistant organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other healthcare-associated infections.

RESULTS

After adjusting for the correlation within inpatient units and hospitals, there was a significant overall improvement in HH adherence associated with the intervention (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.73 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.47-1.99]; P < .0001). Monthly HH adherence relative to the intervention increased from 29% (1 395 450/4 544 144) to 37% (598 035/1 536 643) within 1 month, followed by consecutive incremental increases up to 53% (804 108/1 515 537) by 10 months (P < .0001). There was a trend toward reduced healthcare-associated transmission of MRSA (IRR, 0.74 [95% CI, .53-1.04]; P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a system for group electronic monitoring led to rapid, significant improvements in HH performance within a 2-year period. This method offers significant advantages over direct observation for measurement and improvement of HH.

摘要

背景

目前衡量手卫生(HH)的方法依赖于人工审核员,他们只能捕捉到<1%的 HH 机会,并且很快被员工识别出来,导致绩效膨胀。群体电子监测是一种经过验证的测量 HH 依从性的方法,但缺乏证明该技术临床效果的数据。

方法

在加拿大安大略省的 5 家急性护理医院的 26 个住院内科和外科病房进行了一项逐步楔形集群随机质量改进研究。该干预措施包括通过群体电子监测进行日常 HH 报告,以指导以单位为基础的改进策略。主要结果是基线和干预之间每月 HH 依从率(百分比)。次要结果包括耐抗生素的生物体(如耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA))和其他医疗保健相关感染的传播。

结果

在调整了住院病房内和医院内的相关性后,与干预相关的 HH 依从率有显著提高(发生率比[IRR],1.73 [95%置信区间{CI},1.47-1.99];P<0.0001)。与干预相关的每月 HH 依从率从干预前的 29%(1 395 450/4 544 144)增加到干预后的 37%(598 035/1 536 643),1 个月内持续增加,直到 10 个月后增加到 53%(804 108/1 515 537)(P<0.0001)。MRSA 的医疗保健相关传播有减少的趋势(IRR,0.74 [95% CI,.53-1.04];P=0.08)。

结论

引入群体电子监测系统在两年内迅速显著提高了 HH 性能。与直接观察相比,这种方法在测量和改善 HH 方面具有显著优势。

相似文献

1
Introduction of Group Electronic Monitoring of Hand Hygiene on Inpatient Units: A Multicenter Cluster Randomized Quality Improvement Study.群组电子手部卫生监测在住院病房中的应用:一项多中心集群随机质量改进研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):e680-e685. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa412.
2
Association Between Hospital Outbreaks and Hand Hygiene: Insights from Electronic Monitoring.医院感染爆发与手卫生的关联:电子监测的洞察。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3656-e3660. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1405.
3
Effect of Wearing a Novel Electronic Wearable Device on Hand Hygiene Compliance Among Health Care Workers: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.佩戴新型电子可穿戴设备对医护人员手卫生依从性的影响:一项阶梯楔形整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035331. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35331.
4
[A multimodal strategy to improve adherence to hand hygiene in a university hospital].[一种提高大学医院手部卫生依从性的多模式策略]
Rev Calid Asist. 2017 Jan-Feb;32(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
Effect of a multifaceted intervention on adherence to hand hygiene among healthcare workers: a cluster-randomized trial.多方面干预对医护人员手卫生依从性的影响:一项整群随机试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;31(11):1170-6. doi: 10.1086/656592.
6
Effect of Frequency of Changing Point-of-Use Reminder Signs on Health Care Worker Hand Hygiene Adherence: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.在使用点提醒标志更换频率对医护人员手部卫生依从性的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913823. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13823.
7
Validation and implementation of group electronic hand hygiene monitoring across twenty-four critical care units.跨 24 个重症监护病房验证和实施团体电子手卫生监测。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Jul;43(7):834-839. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.250. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
8
Pitfalls and Unexpected Benefits of an Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring System.电子手卫生监测系统的陷阱和意外获益。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Sep;47(9):1102-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
9
Impact of a hospital-wide hand hygiene initiative on healthcare-associated infections: results of an interrupted time series.医院范围的手卫生倡议对医源性感染的影响:一项中断时间序列研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21(12):1019-26. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000800. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
10
Impact of COVID-19 on hospital hand hygiene performance: a multicentre observational study using group electronic monitoring.新型冠状病毒肺炎对医院手卫生执行情况的影响:使用群组电子监测的多中心观察性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Dec 14;9(4):E1175-E1180. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210072. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
2
Hand hygiene opportunities in neonatal intensive care: a multicenter observational study to calibrate group electronic monitoring systems.新生儿重症监护中的手卫生时机:一项用于校准群组电子监测系统的多中心观察性研究
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 27;46(5):1-3. doi: 10.1017/ice.2025.36.
3
Rinse, gel, and foam - is there any evidence for a difference in their effectiveness in preventing infections?
冲洗、凝胶和泡沫——它们在预防感染方面的效果有区别吗?有相关证据吗?
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 May 10;13(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01405-5.
4
Hand hygiene knowledge, attitude, barriers and improvement measures among healthcare workers in the Republic of Korea: a cross-sectional survey exploring interprofessional differences.韩国医护人员的手卫生知识、态度、障碍及改进措施:一项探索不同专业间差异的横断面调查。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Sep 7;12(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01296-y.
5
The effect of a prospective intervention program with automated monitoring of hand hygiene performance in long-term and acute-care units at a Veterans Affairs medical center.前瞻性干预计划对退伍军人事务医疗中心长期和急性护理病房手卫生性能进行自动监测的效果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;45(2):207-214. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.186. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
6
Effects of the Implementation of Intelligent Technology for Hand Hygiene in Hospitals: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.智能手卫生技术在医院实施效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 29;25:e37249. doi: 10.2196/37249.
7
Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit.比较两种通过无线技术提供实时反馈以提高重症监护病房手部卫生依从性的电子手部卫生系统。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 25;2(1):e127. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.270. eCollection 2022.
8
Electronic hand hygiene monitoring systems: Not worth the costs.电子手卫生监测系统:得不偿失。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 25;2(1):e126. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.264. eCollection 2022.
9
The role of the environment in transmission of vancomycin-resistant : A proof-of-concept study.环境在耐万古霉素传播中的作用:一项概念验证研究。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 4;2(1):e178. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.318. eCollection 2022.
10
Impact of conducting hand hygiene audit in COVID-19 care locations of India-A large scale national multicentric study - HHAC study.印度 COVID-19 护理场所实施手卫生审核的影响——一项大规模的全国多中心研究 - HHAC 研究。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2023 May-Jun;43:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Oct 1.