• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性干预计划对退伍军人事务医疗中心长期和急性护理病房手卫生性能进行自动监测的效果。

The effect of a prospective intervention program with automated monitoring of hand hygiene performance in long-term and acute-care units at a Veterans Affairs medical center.

机构信息

Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;45(2):207-214. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.186. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1017/ice.2023.186
PMID:37649167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877535/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure the impact of an automated hand hygiene monitoring system (AHHMS) and an intervention program of complementary strategies on hand hygiene (HH) performance in both acute-care and long-term care (LTC) units.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, before-and-after intervention study.

SETTING

Single Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), with 2 acute-care units and 6 LTC units.

METHODS

An AHHMS that provides group HH performance rates was implemented on 8 units at a VAMC from March 2021 through April 2022. After a 4-week baseline period and 2.5-week washout period, the 52-week intervention period included multiple evidence-based components designed to improve HH compliance. Unit HH performance rates were expressed as the number of dispenses (events) divided by the number of patient room entries and exits (opportunities) × 100. Statistical analysis was performed with a Poisson general additive mixed model.

RESULTS

During the 4-week baseline period, the median HH performance rate was 18.6 (95% CI, 16.5-21.0) for all 8 units. During the intervention period, the median HH rate increased to 21.6 (95% CI, 19.1-24.4; < .0001), and during the last 4 weeks of the intervention period (exactly 1 year after baseline), the 8 units exhibited a median HH rate of 25.1 (95% CI, 22.2-28.4; < .0001). The median HH rate increased from 17.5 to 20.0 ( < .0001) in LTC units and from 22.9 to 27.2 ( < .0001) in acute-care units.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention was associated with increased HH performance rates for all units. The performance of acute-care units was consistently higher than LTC units, which have more visitors and more mobile veterans.

摘要

目的

测量自动手卫生监测系统(AHHMS)和补充策略干预计划对急性护理和长期护理(LTC)单位手卫生(HH)执行情况的影响。

设计

前瞻性、非随机、干预前后研究。

设置

单家退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC),有 2 个急性护理病房和 6 个 LTC 病房。

方法

2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 4 月,在一家 VAMC 的 8 个病房实施 AHHMS,该系统提供群体 HH 执行率。经过 4 周的基线期和 2.5 周的洗脱期,为期 52 周的干预期包括多个旨在提高 HH 依从性的循证组成部分。病房 HH 执行率以分配数(事件)除以病房出入次数(机会)×100 表示。使用泊松广义加性混合模型进行统计分析。

结果

在 4 周的基线期内,所有 8 个病房的 HH 执行率中位数为 18.6(95%CI,16.5-21.0)。在干预期间,HH 率中位数上升至 21.6(95%CI,19.1-24.4;<.0001),在干预期的最后 4 周(恰好是基线后 1 年),8 个病房的 HH 率中位数为 25.1(95%CI,22.2-28.4;<.0001)。LTC 病房的 HH 率中位数从 17.5 上升到 20.0(<.0001),急性护理病房的 HH 率中位数从 22.9 上升到 27.2(<.0001)。

结论

干预措施与所有病房的 HH 执行率提高相关。急性护理病房的表现始终高于 LTC 病房,后者访客更多,退伍军人更具流动性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/3ecffcbe060a/S0899823X23001861_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/64727131cc9e/S0899823X23001861_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/4c73322c8a5e/S0899823X23001861_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/d7ab4dc18ecc/S0899823X23001861_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/77bef6918344/S0899823X23001861_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/3ecffcbe060a/S0899823X23001861_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/64727131cc9e/S0899823X23001861_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/4c73322c8a5e/S0899823X23001861_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/d7ab4dc18ecc/S0899823X23001861_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/77bef6918344/S0899823X23001861_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877f/10877535/3ecffcbe060a/S0899823X23001861_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of a prospective intervention program with automated monitoring of hand hygiene performance in long-term and acute-care units at a Veterans Affairs medical center.前瞻性干预计划对退伍军人事务医疗中心长期和急性护理病房手卫生性能进行自动监测的效果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;45(2):207-214. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.186. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
2
The impact of automated hand hygiene monitoring with and without complementary improvement strategies on performance rates.自动化手部卫生监测及其补充改进策略对执行率的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;44(4):638-642. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.141. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
3
Effect of Frequency of Changing Point-of-Use Reminder Signs on Health Care Worker Hand Hygiene Adherence: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.在使用点提醒标志更换频率对医护人员手部卫生依从性的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913823. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13823.
4
Challenges encountered and lessons learned during a trial of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system.电子手卫生监测系统试验中遇到的挑战和吸取的教训。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Dec;47(12):1443-1448. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Impact of an automated hand hygiene monitoring system and additional promotional activities on hand hygiene performance rates and healthcare-associated infections.自动化手部卫生监测系统和额外的宣传活动对手部卫生执行率和医疗相关感染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;40(7):741-747. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.77. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
A multifaceted hand hygiene improvement program on the intensive care units of the National Referral Hospital of Indonesia in Jakarta.印度尼西亚雅加达国家转诊医院重症监护病房的多方面手卫生改进计划。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Jun 3;8:93. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0540-4. eCollection 2019.
7
Impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Multidimensional Hand Hygiene Approach in five intensive care units in three cities of China.国际医院感染控制联盟(INICC)多维度手卫生方法对中国三个城市五家重症监护病房的影响。
Public Health. 2015 Jul;129(7):979-88. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Improvement of hand hygiene compliance among health care workers in intensive care units.重症监护病房医护人员手部卫生依从性的改善
J Prev Med Hyg. 2019 Mar 29;60(1):E31-E35. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.918. eCollection 2019 Mar.
9
Impact of hand hygiene intervention: a comparative study in health care facilities in Dodoma region, Tanzania using WHO methodology.手卫生干预的影响:坦桑尼亚多多马地区医疗机构采用世卫组织方法进行的比较研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jun 8;9(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00743-4.
10
Association Between Hospital Outbreaks and Hand Hygiene: Insights from Electronic Monitoring.医院感染爆发与手卫生的关联:电子监测的洞察。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3656-e3660. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1405.

本文引用的文献

1
SHEA/IDSA/APIC Practice Recommendation: Strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene: 2022 Update.美国感染控制与流行病学专业人员协会/美国传染病学会/医疗机构内感染预防与控制实践标准委员会实践推荐:通过手卫生预防医源性感染的策略:2022 更新版。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):355-376. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.304. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
The impact of automated hand hygiene monitoring with and without complementary improvement strategies on performance rates.自动化手部卫生监测及其补充改进策略对执行率的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;44(4):638-642. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.141. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
3
Impact of COVID-19 on hospital hand hygiene performance: a multicentre observational study using group electronic monitoring.
新型冠状病毒肺炎对医院手卫生执行情况的影响:使用群组电子监测的多中心观察性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Dec 14;9(4):E1175-E1180. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210072. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.
4
Hand Hygiene Compliance Rate During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的手卫生依从率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):1006-1008. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1429.
5
Evaluating the effect of automated hand hygiene technology on compliance and C. difficile rates in a long-term acute care hospital.评价自动化手部卫生技术对长期急性护理医院的依从性和艰难梭菌感染率的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):727-732. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.018. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Impact of Visibility and Accessibility on Healthcare Workers' Hand-Hygiene Behavior: A Comparative Case Study of Two Nursing Units in an Academic Medical Center.可见性和可及性对医护人员手部卫生行为的影响:以学术医疗中心的两个护理单元为例的对比案例研究。
HERD. 2021 Apr;14(2):271-288. doi: 10.1177/1937586720962506. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hand hygiene performance in hospitals.COVID-19 大流行对医院手卫生性能的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency.电子手卫生监测:准确性、对霍桑效应的影响及效率
J Infect Prev. 2020 Jul;21(4):136-143. doi: 10.1177/1757177420907999. Epub 2020 May 28.
9
Impact of an automated hand hygiene monitoring system combined with a performance improvement intervention on hospital-acquired infections.自动化手部卫生监测系统联合绩效改进干预对医院获得性感染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;41(8):931-937. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.182. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
Introduction of Group Electronic Monitoring of Hand Hygiene on Inpatient Units: A Multicenter Cluster Randomized Quality Improvement Study.群组电子手部卫生监测在住院病房中的应用:一项多中心集群随机质量改进研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):e680-e685. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa412.