Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;45(2):207-214. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.186. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
To measure the impact of an automated hand hygiene monitoring system (AHHMS) and an intervention program of complementary strategies on hand hygiene (HH) performance in both acute-care and long-term care (LTC) units.
Prospective, nonrandomized, before-and-after intervention study.
Single Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), with 2 acute-care units and 6 LTC units.
An AHHMS that provides group HH performance rates was implemented on 8 units at a VAMC from March 2021 through April 2022. After a 4-week baseline period and 2.5-week washout period, the 52-week intervention period included multiple evidence-based components designed to improve HH compliance. Unit HH performance rates were expressed as the number of dispenses (events) divided by the number of patient room entries and exits (opportunities) × 100. Statistical analysis was performed with a Poisson general additive mixed model.
During the 4-week baseline period, the median HH performance rate was 18.6 (95% CI, 16.5-21.0) for all 8 units. During the intervention period, the median HH rate increased to 21.6 (95% CI, 19.1-24.4; < .0001), and during the last 4 weeks of the intervention period (exactly 1 year after baseline), the 8 units exhibited a median HH rate of 25.1 (95% CI, 22.2-28.4; < .0001). The median HH rate increased from 17.5 to 20.0 ( < .0001) in LTC units and from 22.9 to 27.2 ( < .0001) in acute-care units.
The intervention was associated with increased HH performance rates for all units. The performance of acute-care units was consistently higher than LTC units, which have more visitors and more mobile veterans.
测量自动手卫生监测系统(AHHMS)和补充策略干预计划对急性护理和长期护理(LTC)单位手卫生(HH)执行情况的影响。
前瞻性、非随机、干预前后研究。
单家退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC),有 2 个急性护理病房和 6 个 LTC 病房。
2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 4 月,在一家 VAMC 的 8 个病房实施 AHHMS,该系统提供群体 HH 执行率。经过 4 周的基线期和 2.5 周的洗脱期,为期 52 周的干预期包括多个旨在提高 HH 依从性的循证组成部分。病房 HH 执行率以分配数(事件)除以病房出入次数(机会)×100 表示。使用泊松广义加性混合模型进行统计分析。
在 4 周的基线期内,所有 8 个病房的 HH 执行率中位数为 18.6(95%CI,16.5-21.0)。在干预期间,HH 率中位数上升至 21.6(95%CI,19.1-24.4;<.0001),在干预期的最后 4 周(恰好是基线后 1 年),8 个病房的 HH 率中位数为 25.1(95%CI,22.2-28.4;<.0001)。LTC 病房的 HH 率中位数从 17.5 上升到 20.0(<.0001),急性护理病房的 HH 率中位数从 22.9 上升到 27.2(<.0001)。
干预措施与所有病房的 HH 执行率提高相关。急性护理病房的表现始终高于 LTC 病房,后者访客更多,退伍军人更具流动性。